Taxonomic Analysis of Perceived Risk: Modeling Individual and Group Perceptions Within Homogeneous Hazard Domains

Previous studies of risk perception have typically focused on the mean judgments of a group of people regarding the riskiness (or safety) of a diverse set of hazardous activities, substances, and technologies. This paper reports the results of two studies that take a different path. Study 1 investigated whether models within a single technological domain were similar to previous models based on group means and diverse hazards. Study 2 created a group taxonomy of perceived risk for only one technological domain, railroads, and examined whether the structure of that taxonomy corresponded with taxonomies derived from prior studies of diverse hazards. Results from Study 1 indicated that the importance of various risk characteristics in determining perceived risk differed across individuals and across hazards, but not so much as to invalidate the results of earlier studies based on group means and diverse hazards. In Study 2, the detailed analysis of railroad hazards produced a structure that had both important similarities to, and dissimilarities from, the structure obtained in prior research with diverse hazard domains. The data also indicated that railroad hazards are really quite diverse, with some approaching nuclear reactors in their perceived seriousness. These results suggest that information about the diversitymore » of perceptions within a single domain of hazards could provide valuable input to risk-management decisions.« less

[1]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[2]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  The psychometric study of risk perception , 1986 .

[3]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Characterizing Perceived Risk , 1985 .

[4]  J. Richard Eiser,et al.  Characterising the Perceived Risks and Benefits of Some Health Issues , 1984 .

[5]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Modeling the Societal Impact of Fatal Accidents , 1984 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Representations of perceptions of risks , 1984 .

[7]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Psychological and sociological approaches to study risk perception , 1984 .

[8]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  How Close Is Close Enough: Public Perceptions of the Risks of Industrial Facilities , 1983 .

[9]  S. Macgill.  Exploring the Similarities of Different Risks , 1983 .

[10]  Jan A. J. Stolwijk,et al.  Risk and Benefit Perceptions, Acceptability Judgments, and Self-Reported Actions toward Nuclear Power , 1982 .

[11]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Cognitive Components of Risk Ratings , 1981 .

[12]  Charles Vlek,et al.  Judging risks and benefits in the small and in the large , 1981 .

[13]  P. Slovic,et al.  FACTS AND FEARS: UNDERSTANDING PERCEIVED RISK.: P/3 , 1980 .

[14]  C. H. Green,et al.  Precepts of Safety Assessment , 1980 .

[15]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Rating the Risks , 1979 .

[16]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Handling hazards: can hazard management be improved. [Potential and strategies for improvement] , 1978 .

[17]  David W. Cravens,et al.  Fractional Factorial Experimental Designs in Marketing Research , 1973 .

[18]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment. , 1971 .

[19]  Robert J. Wherry,et al.  Comparison of Two Approaches—Jan and Prof—for Capturing Rater Strategies , 1966 .