GPS Measurement Error Gives Rise to Spurious 180° Turning Angles and Strong Directional Biases in Animal Movement Data

Background Movement data are frequently collected using Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers, but recorded GPS locations are subject to errors. While past studies have suggested methods to improve location accuracy, mechanistic movement models utilize distributions of turning angles and directional biases and these data present a new challenge in recognizing and reducing the effect of measurement error. Methods I collected locations from a stationary GPS collar, analyzed a probabilistic model and used Monte Carlo simulations to understand how measurement error affects measured turning angles and directional biases. Results Results from each of the three methods were in complete agreement: measurement error gives rise to a systematic bias where a stationary animal is most likely to be measured as turning 180° or moving towards a fixed point in space. These spurious effects occur in GPS data when the measured distance between locations is <20 meters. Conclusions Measurement error must be considered as a possible cause of 180° turning angles in GPS data. Consequences of failing to account for measurement error are predicting overly tortuous movement, numerous returns to previously visited locations, inaccurately predicting species range, core areas, and the frequency of crossing linear features. By understanding the effect of GPS measurement error, ecologists are able to disregard false signals to more accurately design conservation plans for endangered wildlife.

[1]  H. Fritz,et al.  Scale–dependent hierarchical adjustments of movement patterns in a long–range foraging seabird , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Hannah W. McKenzie,et al.  Inferring linear feature use in the presence of GPS measurement error , 2009, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[3]  C. Patlak.  Random walk with persistence and external bias , 1953 .

[4]  J. Bishop.  Global radionavigation and location systems for tracking marine mammals , 1995 .

[5]  J. A. Schaefer,et al.  Caribou movement as a correlated random walk , 2000, Oecologia.

[6]  G. Odell,et al.  Swarms of Predators Exhibit "Preytaxis" if Individual Predators Use Area-Restricted Search , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[7]  Stan Boutin,et al.  Avoidance of Industrial Development by Woodland Caribou , 2001 .

[8]  Yosef Cohen,et al.  Effects of moose movement and habitat use on GPS collar performance , 1996 .

[9]  G. M.,et al.  Partial Differential Equations I , 2023, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[10]  David P Wolfer,et al.  Miniature neurologgers for flying pigeons: multichannel EEG and action and field potentials in combination with GPS recording. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Peter Turchin,et al.  Translating Foraging Movements in Heterogeneous Environments into the Spatial Distribution of Foragers , 1991 .

[12]  S. Åkesson,et al.  The implications of location accuracy for the interpretation of satellite-tracking data , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  R. Veit,et al.  Partial Differential Equations in Ecology: Spatial Interactions and Population Dynamics , 1994 .

[14]  A. Solow.  A note on the statistical properties of animal locations , 1990, Journal of mathematical biology.

[15]  Y. Ropert‐Coudert,et al.  The three-dimensional flight of red-footed boobies: adaptations to foraging in a tropical environment? , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Carl H. Key,et al.  Satellite telemetry: performance of animal-tracking systems , 1991 .

[17]  Luigi Boitani,et al.  High human density in the irreplaceable sites for African vertebrates conservation , 2006 .

[18]  Ian D. Jonsen,et al.  ROBUST STATE-SPACE MODELING OF ANIMAL MOVEMENT DATA , 2005 .

[19]  Alastair Franke,et al.  Analysis of movements and behavior of caribou (Rangifer tarandus) using hidden Markov models , 2004 .

[20]  Georges Janeau,et al.  ASSESSING REAL DAILY DISTANCE TRAVELED BY UNGULATES USING DIFFERENTIAL GPS LOCATIONS , 2004 .

[21]  Sandra K. Austin.  Saving nature’s legacy. Protecting and restoring biodiversity , 1996, Economic Botany.

[22]  Georges Janeau,et al.  GPS approach to study fine-scale site use by wild red deer during active and inactive behaviors , 2003 .

[23]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Movement parameters of ungulates and scale‐specific responses to the environment , 2002 .

[24]  Raymond B. Iglay,et al.  A Comparison of Two Methods for Studying Box Turtle Movements , 2006 .

[25]  Donna Delparte,et al.  Effects of radio‐collar position and orientation on GPS radio‐collar performance, and the implications of PDOP in data screening , 2005 .

[26]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  Activity pattern of foraging in the wandering albatross: a marine predator with two modes of prey searching , 1997 .

[27]  Corey J A Bradshaw,et al.  Measurement error causes scale-dependent threshold erosion of biological signals in animal movement data. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[28]  C. C. Barton,et al.  Where in the world are my field plots? Using GPS effectively in environmental field studies , 2004 .

[29]  Juan M. Morales,et al.  EXTRACTING MORE OUT OF RELOCATION DATA: BUILDING MOVEMENT MODELS AS MIXTURES OF RANDOM WALKS , 2004 .

[30]  D. Grémillet,et al.  GPS tracking a marine predator: the effects of precision, resolution and sampling rate on foraging tracks of African Penguins , 2004 .

[31]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  A landscape simulation model of winter foraging by large ungulates , 1993 .

[32]  Lee A. Vierling,et al.  Effects of habitat on GPS collar performance: using data screening to reduce location error , 2007 .

[33]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Removing GPS collar bias in habitat selection studies , 2004 .

[34]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[35]  Charles R. Anderson,et al.  Estimating cougar predation rates from GPS location clusters , 2003 .

[36]  Darcy R. Visscher,et al.  GPS MEASUREMENT ERROR INFLUENCES ON MOVEMENT MODEL PARAMETERIZATION , 2005 .

[37]  Carlos Carroll,et al.  A Multicriteria Assessment of the Irreplaceability and Vulnerability of Sites in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem , 2002 .

[38]  N. Arai,et al.  Fine-Scale Tracking of Marine Turtles Using GPS-Argos PTTs , 2005, Zoological science.

[39]  Arthur R. Rodgers,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF A GPS ANIMAL LOCATION SYSTEM UNDER BOREAL FOREST CANOPY , 1995 .

[40]  이영재,et al.  Differential GPS와 응용 , 1994 .

[41]  P. Turchin.  Quantitative Analysis Of Movement , 1998 .

[42]  Stan Boutin,et al.  Quantifying barrier effects of roads and seismic lines on movements of female woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta , 2002 .

[43]  David Ganskopp,et al.  GPS Error in Studies Addressing Animal Movements and Activities , 2007 .

[44]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Accuracy of GPS telemetry collar locations with differential correction , 1997 .

[45]  Darcy R. Visscher,et al.  GPS measurement error and resource selection functions in a fragmented landscape , 2006 .