Finding Common Ground in Team-Based Qualitative Research Using the Convergent Interviewing Method

Research councils, agencies, and researchers recognize the benefits of team-based health research. However, researchers involved in large-scale team-based research projects face multiple challenges as they seek to identify epistemological and ontological common ground. Typically, these challenges occur between quantitative and qualitative researchers but can occur between qualitative researchers, particularly when the project involves multiple disciplinary perspectives. The authors use the convergent interviewing technique in their multidisciplinary research project to overcome these challenges. This technique assists them in developing common epistemological and ontological ground while enabling swift and detailed data collection and analysis. Although convergent interviewing is a relatively new method described primarily in marketing research, it compares and contrasts well with grounded theory and other techniques. The authors argue that this process provides a rigorous method to structure and refine research projects and requires researchers to identify and be accountable for developing a common epistemological and ontological position.

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[2]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[3]  S. Kvale The Social Construction of Validity , 1995 .

[4]  C. Perry,et al.  Convergent interviewing to build a theory in under‐researched areas: principles and an example investigation of Internet usage in inter‐firm relationships , 2003 .

[5]  B. Berg Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[6]  V. Gilchrist Key informant interviews. , 1992 .

[7]  K. Malterud Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines , 2001, The Lancet.

[8]  T. Marteau,et al.  The Place of Inter-Rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: An Empirical Study , 1997 .

[9]  Evert Gummesson,et al.  Qualitative research in marketing , 2005 .

[10]  Cindy Gallois,et al.  Attributes and skills of an effective musculoskeletal consumer. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.

[11]  N. Mauthner,et al.  Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis , 2003 .

[12]  G. Fine,et al.  NETWORK AND MEANING: AN INTERACTIONIST APPROACH TO STRUCTURE , 1983 .

[13]  C. Seale,et al.  Quality in Qualitative Research , 1999 .

[14]  J. C. Flanagan Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[15]  The Diversity of Convergent Interviewing: Applications for Early Researchers and Postgraduate Students. , 2004 .

[16]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[17]  James A. Holstein,et al.  Qualitative Interviewing and Grounded Theory Analysis , 2003 .

[18]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .