Assessing the differences in characteristics of patients lost to follow-up at 2 years: results from the Quality Outcomes Database study on outcomes of surgery for grade I spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE Loss to follow-up has been shown to bias outcomes assessment among studies utilizing clinical registries. Here, the authors analyzed patients enrolled in a national surgical registry and compared the baseline characteristics of patients captured with those lost to follow-up at 2 years. METHODS The authors queried the Quality Outcomes Database for patients with grade I lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing a surgical intervention between July 2014 and June 2016. Only those patients enrolled in a multisite study investigating the impact of fusion on clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with grade I spondylolisthesis were evaluated. RESULTS Of the 608 patients enrolled in the study undergoing 1- or 2-level decompression (23.0%, n = 140) or 1-level fusion (77.0%, n = 468), 14.5% (n = 88) were lost to follow-up at 2 years. Patients who were lost to follow-up were more likely to be younger (59.6 ± 13.5 vs 62.6 ± 11.7 years, p = 0.031), be employed (unemployment rate: 53.3% [n = 277] for successful follow-up vs 40.9% [n = 36] for those lost to follow-up, p = 0.017), have anxiety (26.1% [n = 23] vs 16.3% [n = 85], p = 0.026), have higher back pain scores (7.4 ± 2.9 vs 6.6 ± 2.8, p = 0.010), have higher leg pain scores (7.4 ± 2.5 vs 6.4 ± 2.9, p = 0.003), have higher Oswestry Disability Index scores (50.8 ± 18.7 vs 46 ± 16.8, p = 0.018), and have lower EQ-5D scores (0.481 ± 0.2 vs 0.547 ± 0.2, p = 0.012) at baseline. CONCLUSIONS To execute future, high-quality studies, it is important to identify patients undergoing surgery for spondylolisthesis who might be lost to follow-up. In a large, prospective registry, the authors found that those lost to follow-up were more likely to be younger, be employed, have anxiety disorder, and have worse PRO scores.

[1]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database. , 2019, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[2]  M. Grotle,et al.  Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis , 2019, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[3]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  Obese Patients Benefit, but do not Fare as Well as Nonobese Patients, Following Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Surgery: An Analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database. , 2018, Neurosurgery.

[4]  D. Sackett Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM , 2018 .

[5]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database. , 2017, Neurosurgical focus.

[6]  L. Funk,et al.  One-year Surgical Outcomes and Costs for Medicaid Versus Non-Medicaid Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Single-Center Study , 2016, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[7]  M. McGirt,et al.  Using clinical registries to improve the quality of neurosurgical care. , 2015, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[8]  S. Burwell,et al.  Setting value-based payment goals--HHS efforts to improve U.S. health care. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  T. Klaiman,et al.  Leveraging effective clinical registries to advance medical care quality and transparency. , 2014, Population health management.

[10]  R. Ohrbach,et al.  Study protocol, sample characteristics, and loss to follow-up: the OPPERA prospective cohort study. , 2013, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[11]  Hhs Centers for Medicare Medicare Services Medicare program; hospital inpatient value-based purchasing program. Final rule. , 2011, Federal register.

[12]  J. Dettori,et al.  Loss to follow-up , 2011, Evidence-based spine-care journal.

[13]  T. Solberg,et al.  Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine? , 2011, Acta orthopaedica.

[14]  W. Shih,et al.  Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine , 2002 .

[15]  R. Luckmann Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM, 2nd Edition: By David L. Sackett, Sharon E. Straus, W. Scott Richardson, William Rosenberg, and R. Brian Haynes, Churchill Livingstone, 2000 , 2001 .

[16]  M. Dewey,et al.  Assessing research outcomes by postal questionnaire with telephone follow-up. TOTAL Study Group. Trial of Occupational Therapy and Leisure. , 2000, International journal of epidemiology.

[17]  P. Pynsent,et al.  The Oswestry Disability Index. , 2000, Spine.

[18]  S. Hollis,et al.  What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials , 1999, BMJ.

[19]  S. Satya‐Murti Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM , 1997 .

[20]  A C Sims,et al.  Importance of a high tracing-rate in long-term medical follow-up studies. , 1973, Lancet.

[21]  A. Chan Erratum. Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database. , 2019, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[22]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database. , 2018, Neurosurgical focus.

[23]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database. , 2018, Neurosurgical focus.

[24]  A. Asher,et al.  The Role of Clinical Registries in Health Care , 2018 .

[25]  F. Harrell,et al.  The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): general overview and pilot-year project description. , 2013, Neurosurgical focus.

[26]  M. McGirt,et al.  The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database and NeuroPoint Alliance: rationale, development, and implementation. , 2013, Neurosurgical focus.

[27]  Mats Lundström,et al.  Use of 13 disease registries in 5 countries demonstrates the potential to use outcome data to improve health care's value. , 2012, Health affairs.

[28]  Michael Lee Trends in the law: the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. , 2011, Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics.

[29]  L. Gluud Bias in Clinical Intervention Research Methodological studies of systematic errors in randomised trials and observational studies , 2005 .

[30]  G. Langley,et al.  The visual analogue scale: Its use in pain measurement , 2004, Rheumatology International.

[31]  J. Hunt,et al.  Retaining and tracking cohort study members. , 1998, Epidemiologic reviews.

[32]  D. Murray,et al.  Loss to follow-up matters. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[33]  A. Williams EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[34]  A. Kasuya EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. , 1990, Health policy.