Decentralized Control of Autonomous Mobile Robots Formations using Velocity Potentials

Abstract Mobile robot formations differ in accordance to the mission, environment and robot abilities. In the case of decentralized control, the ability to achieve the shapes of these formations has to be built in the controllers of each autonomous robot. In this paper two types of basic formations are investigated: self-organizing and geometric. Leader follower approach is applied for controllers design to drive the robots toward the goal. Simulations show that that self-organizing formations tend toward platoon formation. Geometric formations approach is also simulated for the case of V-formations passing through a passage. The results confirm the ability of velocity potential approach for motion control of both self-organizing and geometric formations

[1]  Nathan Michael,et al.  Vision-Based, Distributed Control Laws for Motion Coordination of Nonholonomic Robots , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[2]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Controlling formations of multiple mobile robots , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[3]  Peng Song,et al.  Coordination of Robot Teams: A Decentralized Approach , 2006 .

[4]  D.M. Bevly,et al.  Harmonic potential field path planning for high speed vehicles , 2008, 2008 American Control Conference.

[5]  Alan Liu,et al.  Multiagent-Based Multi-team Formation Control for Mobile Robots , 2005, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[6]  Lingqi Zeng,et al.  Collision avoidance for nonholonomic mobile robots among unpredictable dynamic obstacles including humans , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering.

[7]  Mohammad Eghtesad,et al.  Study of the internal dynamics of an autonomous mobile robot , 2006, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[8]  Petter Ögren,et al.  A convergent dynamic window approach to obstacle avoidance , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[9]  Gianluca Antonelli,et al.  Experiments of Formation Control With Multirobot Systems Using the Null-Space-Based Behavioral Control , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[10]  R. W. Brockett,et al.  Asymptotic stability and feedback stabilization , 1982 .

[11]  Giuseppe Oriolo,et al.  Local incremental planning for a car-like robot navigating among obstacles , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Ricardo Carelli,et al.  Stable contour-following control of wheeled mobile robots , 2009, Robotica.

[13]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Controlling Shapes of Ensembles of Robots of Finite Size with Nonholonomic Constraints , 2008, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[14]  Farbod Fahimi,et al.  Real-time obstacle avoidance for multiple mobile robots , 2009, Robotica.

[15]  Jizhong Xiao,et al.  Robot Formation Control in Leader-Follower Motion Using Direct Lyapunov Method , 2005 .

[16]  Dusan M. Stipanovic,et al.  Formation Control and Collision Avoidance for Multi-agent Non-holonomic Systems: Theory and Experiments , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[17]  Jerzy Sasiadek,et al.  Control of nonholonomic autonomous vehicles and their formations , 2010, 2010 15th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics.

[18]  Drago Matko,et al.  Wheeled Mobile Robots Control in a Linear Platoon , 2009, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[19]  Nathan Michael,et al.  Vision-Based Localization for Leader–Follower Formation Control , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.