Vitalistic causality in young children's naive biology

One of the key issues in conceptual development research concerns what kinds of causal devices young children use to understand the biological world. We review evidence that children predict and interpret biological phenomena, especially human bodily processes, on the basis of 'vitalistic causality'. That is, they assume that vital power or life force taken from food and water makes humans active, prevents them from being taken ill, and enables them to grow. These relationships are also extended readily to other animals and even to plants. Recent experimental results show that a majority of preschoolers tend to choose vitalistic explanations as most plausible. Vitalism, together with other forms of intermediate causality, constitute unique causal devices for naive biology as a core domain of thought.

[1]  H. Wellman,et al.  Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious , 1991, Cognition.

[2]  Frank C. Keil,et al.  An abstract to concrete shift in the development of biological thought: the insides story , 1995, Cognition.

[3]  H. Wellman,et al.  Knowledge acquisition in foundational domains. , 1998 .

[4]  H. Wellman,et al.  Explaining human movements and actions: Children's understanding of the limits of psychological explanation , 1997, Cognition.

[5]  V. Slaughter,et al.  Learning about life and death in early childhood , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  S. Gelman,et al.  The Essential Child : Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought , 2003 .

[7]  John E. Opfer,et al.  Identifying living and sentient kinds from dynamic information: the case of goal-directed versus aimless autonomous movement in conceptual change , 2002, Cognition.

[8]  D. Kelemen.  British and American children's preferences for teleo-functional explanations of the natural world , 2003, Cognition.

[9]  Giyoo Hatano,et al.  Constrained person analogy in young children's biological inference☆ , 1991 .

[10]  Nicholas L. Cassimatis,et al.  On facts and conceptual systems: young children's integration of their understandings of germs and contagion. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[11]  Patrick Shafto,et al.  Why essences are essential in the psychology of concepts , 2001, Cognition.

[12]  Giyoo Hatano,et al.  Young Children's Spontaneous Personification as Analogy. , 1987 .

[13]  F. Keil,et al.  Mechanism and explanation in the development of biological thought: The case of disease , 1999 .

[14]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Cognition, Perception, and Language , 1997 .

[15]  S. Gelman,et al.  Children's and adults' models for predicting teleological action: the development of a biology-based model. , 2001, Child development.

[16]  G. Diesendruck.  Essentialism in Brazilian children's extensions of animal names. , 2001, Developmental psychology.

[17]  G. Hatano,et al.  Young children's understanding of the mind-body distinction. , 1993, Child development.

[18]  D. Medin,et al.  FOLKBIOLOGY DOESN'T COME FROM FOLKPSYCHOLOGY: EVIDENCE FROM YUKATEK MAYA IN CROSS-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[19]  K. Springer,et al.  Early beliefs about the cause of illness: Evidence against immanent justice , 1992 .

[20]  G. Hatano,et al.  Young children's recognition of commonalities between animals and plants. , 1996, Child development.

[21]  Susan Carey,et al.  On the origin of causal understanding. , 1995 .

[22]  Lawrence A. Hirschfeld,et al.  How biological is essentialism , 1999 .

[23]  E. M. Evans,et al.  Cognitive and Contextual Factors in the Emergence of Diverse Belief Systems: Creation versus Evolution , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  誼余夫 波多野,et al.  Young children's naive thinking about the biological world , 2002 .

[25]  C. Kalish,et al.  Young children's predictions of illness: failure to recognize probabilistic causation. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[26]  H. Wellman.  The Child's Theory of Mind , 1990 .

[27]  D. Kelemen.  Function, goals and intention: children’s teleological reasoning about objects , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  D. Rakison,et al.  Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  Frank C. Keil,et al.  The origins of an autonomous biology. , 1992 .

[30]  C. Kalish.  Children's Understanding of Biology and Health: What young children's understanding of contamination and contagion tells us about their concepts of illness , 1999 .

[31]  S. Carey,et al.  Understanding other minds: linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  D. Medin,et al.  The native mind: biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. , 2004, Psychological review.

[33]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Explaining Disease: Correlations, Causes, and Mechanisms , 1998, Minds and Machines.

[34]  Terry Kit-fong Au,et al.  Mechanical causality in children's 'folkbiology' , 1999 .

[35]  K. Bartsch,et al.  The development of biological explanation: are children vitalists? , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[36]  C. Frith,et al.  Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  M. Siegal,et al.  Children's understanding of biology and health , 1999 .

[38]  György Gergely,et al.  One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  E. Margaret Evans,et al.  Why do birds of a feather flock together? Developmental change in the use of multiple explanations: Intention, teleology and essentialism , 2002 .

[40]  Children's body knowledge: Understanding 'life' as a biological goal , 2002 .

[41]  Robert A. Wilson,et al.  Book Reviews: The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences , 2000, CL.

[42]  F. Keil.  That’s Life: Coming to Understand Biology , 2003, Human Development.

[43]  Robert A. Wilson,et al.  Explanation and Cognition , 2000 .

[44]  D. Medin,et al.  Inductive reasoning in folkbiological thought. , 1999 .

[45]  S. Gelman,et al.  Children's causal explanations of animate and inanimate motion , 1996 .

[46]  E. Spelke,et al.  Infants' knowledge of object motion and human action. , 1995 .

[47]  F. Keil.  Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development , 1989 .

[48]  S. Gelman,et al.  Vitalism in naive biological thinking. , 2000, Developmental psychology.

[49]  D. Medin,et al.  Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction , 2003 .

[50]  Children's Understanding of Biology and Health: Children's understanding of mind–body relationships , 1999 .