Idiosyncratic versus social consensus approaches to personality: Self-view, perceived, and peer-view similarity.

In the current studies, the authors examined how peers influence friendship choices through individuals' perceptions of similarity between their own and others' Big Five traits. Self-reported and peer-reported data were gathered from 3 independent samples using longitudinal round-robin designs. Peers' ratings of how similar 2 persons appeared in extraversion and agreeableness predicted friendship formation likelihood between these 2 persons in all samples. This association was mediated by perceived similarity. Furthermore, another mediation effect was found for similarity in interaction style: Persons who were viewed by peers as having similar extraversion and agreeableness levels became more similar in interaction styles. Thus, the current studies indicate that extraversion and agreeableness influence the emergence of social relationships through intrapersonal perceptions of similarity and interpersonal social interactions. We encourage researchers to look at specific similarity effects that influence interpersonal and intrapersonal processes to understand how relationships are formed.

[1]  Jessica Daecher Advances In Experimental Social Psychology Advances In Experimental Social Psychology , 2016 .

[2]  Jordan B Peterson,et al.  Unifying the aspects of the Big Five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation. , 2013, Journal of personality.

[3]  R. Laird,et al.  Testing Informant Discrepancies as Predictors of Early Adolescent Psychopathology: Why Difference Scores Cannot Tell You What You Want to Know and How Polynomial Regression May , 2013, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[4]  Felix D. Schönbrodt,et al.  PERSOC: A Unified Framework for Understanding the Dynamic Interplay of Personality and Social Relationships , 2011 .

[5]  Deniz S Ones,et al.  An other perspective on personality: meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The Social Relations Model: How to Understand Dyadic Processes , 2010 .

[7]  Jaap J. A. Denissen,et al.  Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: a social network approach. , 2010, Journal of personality.

[8]  S. Vazire PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Who Knows What About a Person ? The Self – Other Knowledge Asymmetry ( SOKA ) Model , 2010 .

[9]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[10]  W. Ickes,et al.  Big Five predictors of behavior and perceptions in initial dyadic interactions: personality similarity helps extraverts and introverts, but hurts "disagreeables". , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Artemio Ramirez,et al.  The Effect of Interactivity on Initial Interactions: The Influence of Information Seeking Role on Computer-Mediated Interaction , 2009 .

[12]  Jaap J. A. Denissen,et al.  In the eye of the beholder: perceived, actual, and peer-rated similarity in personality, communication, and friendship intensity during the acquaintanceship process. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  R. Horton,et al.  Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity , 2008 .

[14]  Lars Penke,et al.  (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/per.682 Neuroticism Predicts Reactions to Cues of Social Inclusion , 2022 .

[15]  Lars Penke,et al.  Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the Five-Factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework , 2008 .

[16]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[17]  Rinie Geenen,et al.  Single‐item big five ratings in a social network design , 2008 .

[18]  A. Ong,et al.  Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: Current status and future directions. , 2007 .

[19]  M. Ashton,et al.  Empirical, Theoretical, and Practical Advantages of the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[20]  Marian M. Morry,et al.  The attraction-similarity hypothesis among cross-sex friends: Relationship satisfaction, perceived similarities, and self-serving perceptions , 2007 .

[21]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Dyadic Data Analysis , 2006 .

[22]  Marian M. Morry,et al.  Relationship satisfaction as a predictor of similarity ratings: A test of the attraction-similarity hypothesis , 2005 .

[23]  J. Snyder,et al.  An Introduction to the Special Issue on Advances in Process and Dynamic System Analysis of Social Interaction and the Development of Antisocial Behavior , 2004, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[24]  J. Arnett Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Road from the Late Teens through the Twenties , 2004 .

[25]  Michael Sunnafrank,et al.  At First Sight: Persistent Relational Effects of Get-Acquainted Conversations , 2004 .

[26]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[27]  Mark Huisman,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Longitudinal Network Data With Changing Composition , 2003 .

[28]  Celia A. Brownell,et al.  Childhood Peer Relationships: Social Acceptance, Friendships, and Peer Networks. , 2003 .

[29]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Social Comparison: Why, With Whom, and With What Effect? , 2002 .

[30]  Booncharoen Sirinaovakul,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue , 2002, Comput. Intell..

[31]  T. Snijders The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics , 2001 .

[32]  D. Watson,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Self-other Agreement in Personality and Affectivity: the Role of Acquaintanceship, Trait Visibility, and Assumed Similarity , 2022 .

[33]  Franz J. Neyer,et al.  The Role of Projection and Empathic Accuracy in Dyadic Perception between Older Twins , 1999 .

[34]  Kirby Gilliland,et al.  The personality theories of H.J. Eysenck and J.A. Gray: a comparative review , 1999 .

[35]  David C. Funder,et al.  Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. , 1999 .

[36]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[37]  J. Asendorpf,et al.  Personality effects on social relationships. , 1998 .

[38]  R. Schalock Conceptualization and measurement , 1996 .

[39]  L. Steinberg,et al.  Homophily of internalized distress in adolescent peer groups. , 1995 .

[40]  D. Funder On the accuracy of personality judgment: a realistic approach. , 1995, Psychological review.

[41]  J. Kupersmidt,et al.  Similarity as the Basis for Children's Friendships: The Roles of Sociometric Status, Aggressive and Withdrawn Behavior, Academic Achievement and Demographic Characteristics , 1995 .

[42]  Laurence Steinberg,et al.  Homophily of internalized distress in adolescent peer groups , 1995 .

[43]  W. Hofstee,et al.  Who should own the definition of personality? , 1994 .

[44]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Consensus in interpersonal perception: acquaintance and the big five. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  S G West,et al.  Consensus, self-other agreement, and accuracy in personality judgment: an introduction. , 1993, Journal of personality.

[46]  R. Hoyle Interpersonal Attraction in the Absence of Explicit Attitudinal Information , 1993 .

[47]  Steven R. Asher,et al.  Friendship and Friendship Quality in Middle Childhood: Links with Peer Group Acceptance and Feelings of Loneliness and Social Dissatisfaction. , 1993 .

[48]  J. Phinney Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: review of research. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[49]  W. Swann Identity negotiation: where two roads meet. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  A. Thorne The press of personality: A study of conversations between introverts and extraverts. , 1987 .

[51]  T. Achenbach,et al.  Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[52]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The Social Relations Model , 1984 .

[53]  R Hogan,et al.  A socioanalytic theory of personality. , 1983, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[54]  Mark Snyder,et al.  On Translating Beliefs Into Action: Theories of Ability and Their Application in an Instructional Setting , 1980 .

[55]  D. Kandel Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[56]  S. Duck,et al.  Personality similarity and the development of friendship: A longitudinal study , 1978 .

[57]  C. Berger,et al.  SOME EXPLORATIONS IN INITIAL INTERACTION AND BEYOND: TOWARD A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION , 1975 .

[58]  Gerald L. Clore,et al.  7 – A Reinforcement-Affect Model of Attraction , 1974 .

[59]  W. Griffitt,et al.  Environmental effects on interpersonal affective behavior: ambient effective temperature and attraction. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[60]  D. Byrne,et al.  ATTRACTION AS A LINEAR FUNCTION OF PROPORTION OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENTS. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  C. Izard Personality similarity, positive affect, and interpersonal attraction. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[62]  Theodore M. Newcomb,et al.  The prediction of interpersonal attraction , 1956 .

[63]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .