Prediction of the Graft Size of 4-Stranded Semitendinosus Tendon and 4-Stranded Gracilis Tendon for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Little information is available regarding parameters that would enable a surgeon to predict the size and length of 4-stranded semitendinosus (ST) and 4-stranded gracilis tendon (GT) grafts. Purpose: To evaluate whether certain preoperative anthropometric data enable prediction of the size of 4-stranded ST and GT autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study (prevalence); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: This study involved 235 Chinese Han patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction with 4-stranded autogenous ST and GT grafts. Preoperatively, the authors recorded height, weight, body mass index (BMI), gender, age, and sports activity. During surgery, the usable length of the ST and GT and the diameter of the 4-stranded grafts made of ST and GT were measured. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine relationships between anthropometric measurements and the length and diameter of intraoperatively measured ST and GT grafts. Results: Strongest correlations for ST and GT length and GT graft diameter were height and weight. The strongest correlations for ST graft diameter were gender and weight. Body mass index had only moderate correlations with ST and GT graft size. Self-reported activity level was not correlated. Women had significantly smaller GT and ST graft diameters and shorter tendon lengths than did men. Semitendinosus graft size was significantly larger and longer than was the GT graft (7.4 ± 0.7 mm vs 5.9 ± 0.6 mm and 279.9 ± 20.8 mm vs 251.5 ± 20.8 mm, respectively). Simple regression analysis demonstrated that height, weight, and BMI can be used to predict ST and GT autograft length and diameter. Conclusion: Several preoperative anthropometric measurements showed correlation with the length of the ST and GT and diameter of 4-stranded ST and GT grafts. The current data may provide surgeons with important preoperative information about size of ST and GT grafts and would be useful for patient counseling and alternative graft source planning.

[1]  Yinglong Xu,et al.  A meta-analysis of hamstring autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. , 2011, The Knee.

[2]  Luiz Eduardo Moreira Teixeira,et al.  Intra-operative four-stranded hamstring tendon graft diameter evaluation , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[3]  T. Strand,et al.  Autologous patellar tendon and quadrupled hamstring grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized multicenter review of different fixation methods , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[4]  L. Salmon,et al.  Why autologous hamstring tendon reconstruction should now be considered the gold standard for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes , 2009, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[5]  Mark D. Miller,et al.  Hamstring Graft Size Prediction , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[6]  W. Grechenig,et al.  Differences in length and cross-section of semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and their effect on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaver study. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  B. Burkhart,et al.  Prediction of hamstring tendon autograft diameter and length for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2008, American journal of orthopedics.

[8]  J. Hart,et al.  Predictors for Hamstring Graft Diameter in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  Jinzhong Zhao,et al.  Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: four versus eight strands of hamstring tendon graft. , 2007, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[10]  Leo A. Pinczewski,et al.  A 10-Year Comparison of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions with Hamstring Tendon and Patellar Tendon Autograft , 2007 .

[11]  Hu Xu Clinical evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus gracilis and semitendinosus autograft. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[12]  N. Adachi,et al.  Predictive value of preoperative 3-dimensional computer tomography measurement of semitendinosus tendon harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[13]  N. Nakamura,et al.  Changes in cross-sectional area of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament grafts as a function of time following transplantation. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[14]  I. M. Al-Kussary,et al.  Clinical evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus gracilis and semitendinosus autograft. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[15]  R. Buzzi,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. A prospective, randomized clinical trial. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  R. Buzzi,et al.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Compared with Double Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Grafts , 2004 .

[17]  K. Shino,et al.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Multistranded Autogenous Semitendinosus Tendon , 1996, The American journal of sports medicine.

[18]  R. Warren,et al.  Anatomic considerations in harvesting the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and a technique of harvest , 1993, The American journal of sports medicine.

[19]  K. Sun,et al.  A prospective randomized comparison of irradiated and non-irradiated hamstring tendon allograft for ACL reconstruction , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[20]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Can pre-operative measures predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter? , 2010, The Knee.

[21]  Xavier Tomas,et al.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction using the horizontal femoral position: a prospective, randomized study , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.