Learning Our Lesson: Review of Quality Teaching in Higher Education Draft Report

Leaders and academics can improve the quality of higher education teaching, and thereby the quality of their graduates, by reflecting on institution-wide practices. This book explores the interplay between actors within institutions, organisational structure, commitment of senior leadership, involvement of faculty and students, and evaluation instruments. Based on an OECD review of 46 quality teaching initiatives in 20 countries, the report highlights the significant impact of the institutions’ environment, trends in the quality of academia, teaching methods and learning conditions. The sample represents 29 higher education institutions, from technological and vocational institutions to business and economic schools, from small undergraduate institutions to multidisciplinary postgraduate universities. The book illustrates the following factors with examples from around the world: the aims of institutions when fostering quality teaching, their options and the guiding philosophy behind a quality approach; concrete ways to apply quality teaching initiatives, challenges to implementing them, and key actors in their dissemination; evaluation systems and the impacts of institutional support on teaching, research and quality culture; and how institution-wide approaches can be combined to enhance quality teaching in a sustainable way. The book also analyses the effects of quality teaching on institutional leaders, faculty members, quality units and students. The contents are as follows: Foreword and acknowledgements; Executive summary; Institutions and quality teaching initiatives under focus; The origins of engagement in quality teaching; Implementing quality teaching support; Monitoring and measuring quality teaching; Conclusions and implications for institutions; Bibliography; Annex A: Methodology.

[1]  M. J. Bormans The Role of Performance Indicators in Improving the Dialogue Between Government and Universities. , 1987 .

[2]  Lee Harvey,et al.  Quality Culture: understandings, boundaries and linkages , 2008 .

[3]  A. Douglas,et al.  Evaluating Teaching Quality , 2006 .

[4]  E. Hazelkorn The Impact of League Tables and Ranking Systems on Higher Education Decision Making , 2007 .

[5]  D. Bradley,et al.  Review of Australian Higher Education: final report , 2008 .

[6]  Christian N. Madu,et al.  Dimensions of quality teaching in higher institutions , 1993 .

[7]  Linda Darling-Hammond,et al.  Futures of Teaching in American Education , 2000 .

[8]  G. Gibbs The Relationship Between Quality in Research and Quality in Teaching. , 1995 .

[9]  Harold Silver,et al.  Innovating in Higher Education: Teaching, Learning, and Institutional Cultures , 2000 .

[10]  R. Shewfelt What is quality , 1999 .

[11]  L. Christman Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1977 .

[12]  John Biggs,et al.  The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning , 2001 .

[13]  A. Skelton Understanding Teaching Excellence in Higher Education: Towards a Critical Approach , 2005 .

[14]  Karen S. Loup,et al.  Assessing Enhancement of Learning, Personal Learning Environment, and Student Efficacy: Alternatives to Traditional Faculty Evaluation in Higher Education , 1997 .

[15]  Helen Gartley,et al.  The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education , 2002 .

[16]  P. Santiago,et al.  Tertiary education for the knowledge society , 2008 .

[17]  L. Shulman,et al.  The Scholarship of Teaching: New Elaborations, New Developments. , 1999 .

[18]  D. Bradley Review of Australian higher education: final report [Bradley review] , 2008 .

[19]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1975 .

[20]  Ian Hau,et al.  Teaching Quality Improvement by Quality Improvement in Teaching , 1996 .

[21]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Scholarship of Teaching: A model , 2000 .

[22]  Maureen Tam,et al.  Measuring Quality and Performance in Higher Education , 2001 .