Retrieval of Medical Cases for Diagnostic Decisions: VISCERAL Retrieval Benchmark

Health providers currently construct their differential diagnosis for a given medical case most often based on textbook knowledge and clinical experience. Data mining of the large amount of medical records generated daily in hospitals is only very rarely done, limiting the reusability of these cases. As part of the VISCERAL project, the Retrieval benchmark was organized to evaluate available approaches for medical case-based retrieval . Participant algorithms were required to find and rank relevant medical cases from a large multimodal dataset (including semantic RadLex terms extracted from text and visual 3D data) for common query topics. The relevance assessment of the cases was done by medical experts who selected cases that are useful for a differential diagnosis for the given query case. The approaches that integrated information from both the RadLex terms and the 3D volumes (mixed techniques) obtained the best results based on five standard evaluation metrics. The benchmark set up, dataset description and result analysis are presented.

[1]  Alba Garcia Seco de Herrera,et al.  Use case oriented medical visual information retrieval & system evaluation , 2015 .

[2]  Allan Hanbury,et al.  VISCERAL: Towards Large Data in Medical Imaging - Challenges and Directions , 2012, MCBR-CDS.

[3]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  A hierarchical knowledge-based approach for retrieving similar medical images described with semantic annotations , 2014, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[4]  Sungbin Choi Multimodal Medical Case-Based Retrieval on the Radiology Image and Report: SNUMedinfo at VISCERAL Retrieval Benchmark , 2015, MRDM@ECIR.

[5]  Henning Müller,et al.  Crowdsourcing for Medical Image Classification , 2014 .

[6]  Henning Müller,et al.  Ground truth generation in medical imaging: a crowdsourcing-based iterative approach , 2012, CrowdMM '12.

[7]  Allan Hanbury,et al.  Overview of the VISCERAL Retrieval Benchmark 2015 , 2015, MRDM@ECIR.

[8]  Carol Peters,et al.  Multilingual Information Retrieval , 2012, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[9]  Georg Langs,et al.  Unsupervised Identification of Clinically Relevant Clusters in Routine Imaging Data , 2016, MICCAI.

[10]  Tobias Gass,et al.  Cloud-Based Evaluation of Anatomical Structure Segmentation and Landmark Detection Algorithms: VISCERAL Anatomy Benchmarks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  C. Langlotz RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[12]  Henning Müller,et al.  USYD/HES-SO in the VISCERAL Retrieval Benchmark , 2015, MRDM@ECIR.

[13]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  Medical Case-Based Retrieval of Patient Records Using the RadLex Hierarchical Lexicon , 2015, MRDM@ECIR.

[14]  Gwénolé Quellec,et al.  Medical Case Retrieval From a Committee of Decision Trees , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[15]  Pol Cirujeda,et al.  RadLex Terms and Local Texture Features for Multimodal Medical Case Retrieval , 2015, MRDM@ECIR.