Short-term Interim Results of Clinical Outcomes and Complications After Implantation of Boston Keratoprosthesis in Japanese Patients.

Keratoprosthesis is used for corneal transplantation in high-risk patients who require penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). Boston keratoprosthesis (BKpro) is a representative type of keratoprosthesis used worldwide. In Japan, the first BKpro was implanted in an eye after multiple corneal graft failures in 2008, but its use remains limited. A recent patient survey revealed that among the Japanese patients who had previously undergone multiple PKPs, the retention rate of BKpro was significantly higher than that of PKP at 5 years postoperatively (100% vs. 26%; P < 0.01). Patients with implanted BKpro also had better best corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or higher than those with PKP at 5 years postoperatively (80.0% vs. 17.6%; P = 0.03). Regarding the postoperative complications, retroprosthetic membrane formation was observed in 88.9%, infectious keratitis in 33.3%, and glaucoma progression in 11.1% of cases. Another retrospective analysis showed that fungal keratitis occurred in 0.09 patients per year and severely affected visual acuity. Furthermore, because it is difficult to accurately examine intraocular pressure after BKpro implantation, the intraocular pressure of patients with implanted BKpro was prospectively estimated using a transpalpebral tonometer (Diaton). In conclusion, BKpro implantation is effective and safe for Japanese patients, given the reported improvements in visual acuity and low rates of complications.

[1]  A. Bardan,et al.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Medium- and Long-Term Outcomes of the Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis. , 2019, Cornea.

[2]  K. Mansouri,et al.  Telemetric Intraocular Pressure Monitoring after Boston Keratoprosthesis surgery with the Eyemate-IO Sensor: Dynamics in the first year. , 2019, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  I. Schwab,et al.  Posterior Segment Complications and Impact on Long-Term Visual Outcomes in Eyes With a Type 1 Boston Keratoprosthesis. , 2019, Cornea.

[4]  R. Niederer,et al.  Repeat corneal transplantation in Auckland, New Zealand: Indications, visual outcomes and risk factors for repeat keratoplasty failure , 2019, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[5]  Ashik Mohamed,et al.  Type 1 Boston Keratoprosthesis for Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency in Epidermolysis Bullosa , 2019, Ocular immunology and inflammation.

[6]  P. Rishi,et al.  Boston Type 2 keratoprosthesis- mid term outcomes from a tertiary eye care centre in India. , 2019, The ocular surface.

[7]  Jay C. Wang,et al.  Outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 reimplantation: multicentre study results. , 2018, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[8]  J. Parel,et al.  Long-term outcomes of the aphakic snap-on Boston type I keratoprosthesis at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute , 2018, Clinical ophthalmology.

[9]  F. Yu,et al.  Long-Term Visual Outcomes, Complications, and Retention of the Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis , 2018, Cornea.

[10]  T. Iwasaki,et al.  Fungal Keratitis After Boston Keratoprosthesis. , 2017, JAMA ophthalmology.

[11]  J. Chodosh,et al.  Long-term Visual Outcomes and Complications of Boston Keratoprosthesis Type II Implantation. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[12]  K. Miyata,et al.  Twelve-year follow-up of penetrating keratoplasty , 2017, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[13]  F. Yu,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes of the Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis in the Management of Corneal Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency , 2016, Cornea.

[14]  Young H. Kwon,et al.  The Utility of Diaton Tonometer Measurements in Patients With Ocular Hypertension, Glaucoma, and Glaucoma Tube Shunts: A Preliminary Study for its Potential Use in Keratoprosthesis Patients , 2016, Journal of glaucoma.

[15]  M. Klufas,et al.  ULTRA-WIDEFIELD IMAGING OF POSTERIOR SEGMENT PATHOLOGY IN THE SETTING OF THE BOSTON KERATOPROSTHESIS , 2016, Retina.

[16]  M. Belin,et al.  Visual Acuity Outcomes of the Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1: Multicenter Study Results. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  S. Hannush,et al.  Outcomes of Repeat Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Implantation. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  M. Gilmore,et al.  Fungal Infections After Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Implantation: Literature Review and In Vitro Antifungal Activity of Hypochlorous Acid , 2015, Cornea.

[19]  F. Yu,et al.  International Outcomes of the Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis in Stevens–Johnson Syndrome , 2015, Cornea.

[20]  Mark I Rosenblatt,et al.  Boston Keratoprosthesis: Outcomes and Complications: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[21]  M. S. Cortina,et al.  Vision-Related Quality-of-Life Assessment Using NEI VFQ-25 in Patients After Boston Keratoprosthesis Implantation , 2015, Cornea.

[22]  S. Cassard,et al.  Donor Corneal Transplantation vs Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis in Patients with Previous Graft Failures: A Retrospective Single Center Study (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). , 2015, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[23]  Beatriz Munoz,et al.  Long-term outcomes of boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation: a retrospective multicenter cohort. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[24]  C. Cursiefen,et al.  [Current treatment options with artificial corneas: Boston Kpro, Osteo-odontokeratoprosthesis, Miro Cornea® and KeraKlear®]. , 2014, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[25]  M. Harissi-Dagher,et al.  Outcomes following Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation in aniridia patients at the University of Montreal. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  T. Porco,et al.  Scleral intraocular pressure measurement in cadaver eyes pre- and postkeratoprosthesis implantation. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  C. Cursiefen,et al.  Aktuelle Versorgungsmöglichkeiten mit Keratoprothesen , 2014, Der Ophthalmologe.

[28]  Michael W. Belin,et al.  Retention of the Boston keratoprosthesis type 1: multicenter study results. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[29]  S. Schwartz,et al.  POSTOPERATIVE POSTERIOR SEGMENT COMPLICATIONS IN EYES TREATED WITH THE BOSTON TYPE I KERATOPROSTHESIS , 2013, Retina.

[30]  F. Yu,et al.  International results with the Boston type I keratoprosthesis. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[31]  M. Harissi-Dagher,et al.  Review of endophthalmitis following Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 , 2012, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[32]  M. Harissi-Dagher,et al.  Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: the CHUM experience. , 2011, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[33]  Xuanchu Duan,et al.  Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry , 2010, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[34]  I. Schwab,et al.  Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: The University of California Davis Experience , 2009, Cornea.

[35]  Y. Shimomura,et al.  Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis in Japan. , 2008, Cornea.

[36]  M. Durand,et al.  Fungal Colonization and Infection in Boston Keratoprosthesis , 2007, Cornea.

[37]  M. Belin,et al.  Results from the multicenter Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[38]  I J Constable,et al.  Corneal replacement using a synthetic hydrogel cornea, AlphaCor™: device, preliminary outcomes and complications , 2003, Eye.

[39]  M. Doane,et al.  PROSTHOKERATOPLASTY , 1972, American journal of ophthalmology.