The emergence of political discourse in online networks : the case of the occupy movement

How does political discourse spread in digital networks? Can we empirically test if certain conceptual frames of social movements have a correlate on their online discussion networks? Through an analysis of Twitter data from the occupy movement, this paper describes the formation of political discourse over time. Building on an a priori set of concepts, derived from theoretical discussions about the movement and its roots, we analyse the data to observe when those concepts start to appear within the networks, who are those Twitter users responsible for them, and what are the patterns through which those concepts spread. Our findings show that, although there are some signs of opportunistic behaviour among activists, most of them are central nodes from the onset of the network, and shape the discussions across time. These central activists do not only start the conversations around given frames, but also sustain over time and become key members of the network. From here, we aim to provide a thorough account of the 'travel' of political discourse, and the correlate of online conversational networks with theoretical accounts of the movement.

[1]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  The Digital Evolution of Occupy Wall Street , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  B. Berg.  Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[3]  D. Graber.  THE MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY: Beyond Myths and Stereotypes , 2003 .

[4]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  The Social Life of Wireless Urban Spaces: Internet Use, Social Networks, and the Public Realm , 2010, Public Space Reader.

[5]  Karen Callaghan, Frauke Schnell,et al.  Assessing the Democratic Debate: How the News Media Frame Elite Policy Discourse , 2001 .

[6]  M. Castells.  ”Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age”. , 2019 .

[7]  J. Zaller,et al.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1992 .

[8]  J. Woody Stanley,et al.  The Effects of Internet Use on Political Participation , 2003, DG.O.

[9]  Lynn H. Fujiwara.  Immigrant Rights Are Human Rights: The Reframing of Immigrant Entitlement and Welfare , 2005 .

[10]  Shanto Iyengar,et al.  Television News and Citizens' Explanations of National Affairs , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[11]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[12]  Sidney Tarrow,et al.  Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics , 1994 .

[13]  Kaye D. Sweetser,et al.  Kids These Days: Examining Differences in Political Uses and Gratifications, Internet Political Participation, Political Information Efficacy, and Cynicism on the Basis of Age , 2011 .

[14]  Jorge Fabrega,et al.  Social Contagion and Cascade Behaviors on Twitter , 2013, Inf..

[15]  E. Snowberg,et al.  Unrepresentative Information The Case of Newspaper Reporting on Campaign Finance , 2005 .

[16]  Neal Caren,et al.  Occupy Online: How Cute Old Men and Malcolm X Recruited 400,000 US Users to OWS on Facebook , 2012 .

[17]  S. Iyengar.  Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. , 1991 .

[18]  J. Juris.  Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation , 2012 .

[19]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The Evolution of Political Knowledge: Theory and Inquiry in American Politics , 2004 .

[20]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[21]  B. Berg,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (8th ed. , 2012 .

[22]  John Gerring,et al.  What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences , 1999, Polity.

[23]  Yannis Theocharis,et al.  Cuts, Tweets, Solidarity and Mobilisation: How the Internet Shaped the Student Occupations , 2012 .