Incorporation Of Rejection Criterion - A Novel Technique For Evaluating Semantic Segmentation Systems

Semantic segmentation ‘SS’ evaluation metrics are great tools to assess systems’ performance in terms of pixels’ accuracy and the alignment of segments. SS systems represent the core element of many human-system interaction applications. Thus, improving the comprehensiveness of SS evaluation metrics can accurately reflect the performance of human-system inter-action. Standard metrics ignore pixels’ confidence scores which can carry useful information. Pixels’ scores represent the level of confidence of the system for assigning class labels to image pixels. However, it has not been utilised by any evaluating metric for semantic segmentation systems. We propose to incorporate pixels’ confidence scores with existing metrics to gain better insights into systems’ behaviours. Results show the usefulness of the introduced approach to utilise the pixels’ scores in the evaluation process. Besides, using pixels’ scores thresholding can help to enhance the system performance on a specific task or objects of a particular size.

[1]  Gabriela Csurka,et al.  What is a good evaluation measure for semantic segmentation? , 2013, BMVC.

[2]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[3]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Carsten Rother,et al.  Panoptic Segmentation , 2018, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[5]  Pushmeet Kohli,et al.  Robust Higher Order Potentials for Enforcing Label Consistency , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[6]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks , 2010, AISTATS.

[7]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  The Pascal Visual Object Classes (VOC) Challenge , 2010, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[8]  Qian Huang,et al.  Quantitative methods of evaluating image segmentation , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[9]  Ryusuke Miyamoto,et al.  Vision-Based Road-Following Using Results of Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Navigation , 2019, 2019 IEEE 9th International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE-Berlin).

[10]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Learning to detect natural image boundaries using local brightness, color, and texture cues , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  Towards total scene understanding: Classification, annotation and segmentation in an automatic framework , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Roberto Cipolla,et al.  Semantic object classes in video: A high-definition ground truth database , 2009, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[13]  Alexander Dekhtyar,et al.  Information Retrieval , 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[14]  Roberto Cipolla,et al.  Segmentation and Recognition Using Structure from Motion Point Clouds , 2008, ECCV.

[15]  Xavier Cufí,et al.  Yet Another Survey on Image Segmentation: Region and Boundary Information Integration , 2002, ECCV.

[16]  I.E. Abdou,et al.  Quantitative design and evaluation of enhancement/thresholding edge detectors , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[18]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.