Minimum zone evaluation of roundness using hybrid global search approach

Engineering parts usually deviate from their intended shapes during their manufacturing due to the inaccuracies of machine tools, deformation of various elements of machine tool, cutting tools and workpiece. Resulting geometric errors affect the functionality and assembly of the parts significantly. This demands a reliable strategy to accurately assess the errors during the final part quality inspection. Among all the geometric features, circular feature is very common on the majority of the engineering parts. Hence, the measurement and evaluation of circularity with a high degree of accuracy are of utmost importance. In the present work, a hybrid approach is proposed to accurately evaluate the circularity error. This approach comprises a least squares method (LSM) and a novel probabilistic global search Lausanne (PGSL) technique. The LSM is used to reduce the search space initially. Within the reduced search space, the PGSL performs efficient, fine and global search. In the process of establishing minimum zone circles to the measured data of the circular features, the proposed approach dynamically updates the probability distribution function of the circularity parameters continuously. The update procedure ensures that the probability of moving towards the potential optimal solutions is increased. The algorithm has been tested using several benchmark datasets for its generalization capability and robustness. The proposed strategy is found to be efficient in yielding accurate results. Therefore, the algorithm can be implemented in computer-aided circularity measuring instruments in order to minimize acceptance of bad parts and rejection of good parts.

[1]  D G Chetwynd,et al.  Applications of Linear Programming to Engineering Metrology , 1985 .

[2]  Franco P. Preparata,et al.  Culling a Set of Points for Roundness or Cylindricity Evaluations , 2003, Int. J. Comput. Geom. Appl..

[3]  H. Ding,et al.  A unified approach for circularity and spatial straightness evaluation using semi-definite programming , 2007 .

[4]  Utpal Roy,et al.  Development and application of Voronoi diagrams in the assessment of roundness error in an industrial environment , 1994 .

[5]  Shi Zhaoyao,et al.  Application of convex hull in the assessment of roundness error , 2008 .

[6]  Kalipada Maity,et al.  An optimisation of micro-EDM operation for fabrication of micro-hole , 2012 .

[7]  Hsi-Yung Feng,et al.  A roundness evaluation algorithm with reduced fitting uncertainty of CMM measurement data , 2006 .

[8]  Sam Anand,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF CIRCULARITY ERROR USING A SELECTIVE DATA PARTITION APPROACH , 1999 .

[9]  Arunanshu S. Kuar,et al.  Characterization of hole circularity in pulsed Nd:YAG laser micro-drilling of TiN–Al2O3 composites , 2010 .

[10]  Jiing-Yih Lai,et al.  Minimum zone evaluation of circles and cylinders , 1996 .

[11]  Mu-Chen Chen,et al.  Roundness inspection strategies for machine visions using non-linear programs and genetic algorithms , 2000 .

[12]  Changlong Du,et al.  Applying particle swarm optimization algorithm to roundness error evaluation based on minimum zone circle , 2014 .

[13]  Sam Anand,et al.  A genetic algorithm based approach for robust evaluation of form tolerances , 2000 .

[14]  Olivier Devillers,et al.  Computing Roundness is Easy if the Set is Almost Round , 2002, Int. J. Comput. Geom. Appl..

[15]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  A direct stochastic algorithm for global search , 2003, Appl. Math. Comput..

[16]  Derek G. Chetwynd,et al.  A new strategy for inspecting roundness features , 1994 .

[17]  M. S. Shunmugam,et al.  Evaluation of form data using computational geometric techniques—Part I: Circularity error , 2007 .

[18]  Xiulan Wen,et al.  An effective genetic algorithm for circularity error unified evaluation , 2006 .

[19]  M. S. Shunmugam,et al.  Evaluation of circularity from coordinate and form data using computational geometric techniques , 2000 .

[20]  Y. Xiong,et al.  Computer aided measurement of profile error of complex surfaces and curves: Theory and algorithm , 1990 .

[21]  D. Miller Micromachining with abrasive waterjets , 2004 .

[22]  Zhaoyao Shi,et al.  The relationship between the minimum zone circle and the maximum inscribed circle and the minimum circumscribed circle , 2009 .

[23]  Arunanshu S. Kuar,et al.  A parametric study of pulsed Nd:YAG laser micro-drilling of gamma-titanium aluminide , 2010 .

[24]  Shi Zhaoyao,et al.  Evaluation of roundness error from coordinate data using curvature technique , 2010 .

[25]  M. S. Shunmugam,et al.  On assessment of geometric errors , 1986 .

[26]  B. Raphael,et al.  A probabilistic search algorithm for finding optimally directed solutions , 2000 .

[27]  M. S. Shunmugam,et al.  New approach for evaluating form errors of engineering surfaces , 1987 .

[28]  T.S.R. Murthy,et al.  A comparison of different algorithms for circularity evaluation , 1986 .

[29]  Mahmudur Rahman,et al.  A review on the conventional and micro-electrodischarge machining of tungsten carbide , 2011 .

[30]  Rudolf Drieschner Chebyshev approximation to data by geometric elements , 2005, Numerical Algorithms.

[31]  S. Nash,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Programming , 1987 .

[32]  P. B. Dhanish,et al.  A simple algorithm for evaluation of minimum zone circularity error from coordinate data , 2002 .

[33]  Kai Egashira,et al.  Electrical discharge machining of submicron holes using ultrasmall-diameter electrodes , 2010 .

[34]  H.-T. Liu,et al.  Waterjet technology for machining fine features pertaining to micromachining , 2010 .

[35]  M. J. Kaiser,et al.  Centers, out-of-roundness measures, and mathematical programming , 1994 .

[36]  Yongbin Zeng,et al.  Electrochemical micromachining of microstructures of micro hole and dimple array , 2009 .