Analytic Morphomics, Core Muscle Size, and Surgical Outcomes

Objective:Assess the relationship between lean core muscle size, measured on preoperative cross-sectional images, and surgical outcomes. Background:Novel measures of preoperative risk are needed. Analytic morphomic analysis of cross-sectional diagnostic images may elucidate vast amounts of patient-specific data, which are never assessed by clinicians. Methods:The study population included all patients within the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative database with a computerized tomography(CT) scan before major, elective general or vascular surgery (N = 1453). The lean core muscle size was calculated using analytic morphomic techniques. The primary outcome measure was survival, whereas secondary outcomes included surgical complications and costs. Covariate adjusted outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariate cox regression, multivariate logistic regression, and generalized estimating equation methods. Results:The mean follow-up was 2.3 years and 214 patients died during the observation period. The covariate-adjusted hazard ratio for lean core muscle area was 1.45 (P = 0.028), indicating that mortality increased by 45% per 1000 mm2 decrease in lean core muscle area. When stratified into tertiles of core muscle size, the 1-year survival was 87% versus 95% for the smallest versus largest tertile, whereas the 3-year survival was 75% versus 91%, respectively (P < 0.003 for both comparisons). The estimated average risk of complications significantly differed and was 20.9%, 15.0%, and 12.3% in the lower, middle, and upper tertiles of lean core muscle area, respectively. Covariate-adjusted cost increased significantly by an estimated $10,110 per 1000 mm2 decrease in core muscle size (P = 0.003). Conclusions:Core muscle size is an independent and potentially important preoperative risk factor. The techniques used to assess preoperative CT scans, namely analytic morphomics, may represent a novel approach to better understanding patient risk.

[1]  D. Campbell,et al.  Accelerating the pace of surgical quality improvement: the power of hospital collaboration. , 2010, Archives of surgery.

[2]  W. Henderson,et al.  The Patient Safety in Surgery Study , 2007 .

[3]  D. Campbell,et al.  Who pays for poor surgical quality? Building a business case for quality improvement. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[4]  T. Pruett Surgical Site Infection Prevention: The Importance of Operative Duration and Blood Transfusion—Results of the First American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Best Practices Initiative , 2009 .

[5]  A. C. Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman,et al.  Predicting mortality of psychogeriatric patients: a simple prognostic frailty risk score , 2009, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[6]  L. Fleisher,et al.  Clinical practice. Lowering cardiac risk in noncardiac surgery. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Karl Hammermeister,et al.  Successful Implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the Private Sector: The Patient Safety in Surgery Study , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[8]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Assessment of physical fitness for esophageal surgery, and targeting interventions to optimize outcomes. , 2010, Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

[9]  T. Marcell Sarcopenia: causes, consequences, and preventions. , 2003, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[10]  P. Cawthon,et al.  Sarcopenia: etiology, clinical consequences, intervention, and assessment , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[11]  L. Fleisher,et al.  LOWERING CARDIAC RISK IN NONCARDIAC SURGERY , 2001 .

[12]  S. Bandinelli,et al.  Frailty syndrome and skeletal muscle: results from the Invecchiare in Chianti study. , 2006, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[13]  D. Campbell,et al.  The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative: a legacy of Shukri Khuri. , 2009, American journal of surgery.

[14]  D. Campbell,et al.  The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative: Will a Statewide Quality Improvement Initiative Pay for Itself? , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[15]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size. , 2004, JAMA.

[16]  E. Antman,et al.  ACC/AHA Guideline Update for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery—Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluati , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  L. Kuller,et al.  Excessive Loss of Skeletal Muscle Mass in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[18]  M. Englesbe,et al.  Frailty, core muscle size, and mortality in patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. , 2011, Journal of vascular surgery.

[19]  E. Antman,et al.  ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery---executive summary a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluat , 2002, Circulation.

[20]  F. Grover,et al.  Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[21]  Douglas E Schaubel,et al.  Sarcopenia and mortality after liver transplantation. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[22]  V. Mor,et al.  Frailty and Hospitalization of Long‐Term Stay Nursing Home Residents , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[23]  S. Khuri,et al.  The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery. , 2005, Surgery.

[24]  Jean-Pierre Michel,et al.  Frailty Syndrome: A Transitional State in a Dynamic Process , 2009, Gerontology.

[25]  T. Welling,et al.  Who Pays for Biliary Complications Following Liver Transplant? A Business Case for Quality Improvement , 2006, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[26]  S. Colletta,et al.  Structured exercise improves physical functioning in women with stages I and II breast cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  L. Adams,et al.  Supervised moderate intensity exercise improves distance walked at hospital discharge following coronary artery bypass graft surgery--a randomised controlled trial. , 2008, Heart, lung & circulation.

[28]  K Y Liang,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. , 1986, Biometrics.

[29]  L. Fried,et al.  Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[30]  K. Courneya,et al.  Effects of presurgical exercise training on systemic inflammatory markers among patients with malignant lung lesions. , 2009, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.