Assessing the potential disturbance effects on the use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UASs) for European vultures research: a review and conservation recommendations

Summary Vultures are among the most threatened bird guilds on the planet and have a unique functional role within ecosystems. They are therefore subject to increasing research interest, calling for standardised study approaches and monitoring methods. The use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UASs) is rapidly gaining popularity in ecological research due to technological advances, affordability, and accessibility. This study reviews the existing peer-reviewed publications and grey literature on the responses of European vultures and other comparable species to UASs, and summarises the types of UAS use, their potential disturbance effects on vultures, and the resulting inter- and intra-specific interactions. Our goal was to assess the potential effects of UASs and to provide practical recommendations to optimise their safe use in vulture conservation and research. We acknowledge the potential of UASs to increase research efficiency and reduce research effort, time, and financial cost. Owing to the absence of sufficient data on long-term disturbance effects, we advocate the precautionary principle and offer a set of species-tailored practical recommendations to limit the potential negative effects of UASs and maximise their value in conservation management. We urge that the physiological and long-term impacts on vulture reproduction are considered and call for standardised monitoring protocols and controls on UAS use. Our conclusions and recommendations are particularly aimed at researchers working on vulture conservation and restoration projects worldwide.

[1]  A. Margalida,et al.  Griffon vultures, livestock and farmers: Unraveling a complex socio-economic ecological conflict from a conservation perspective , 2022, Biological Conservation.

[2]  Huyen Nguyen,et al.  Radio-tracking wildlife with drones: a viewshed analysis quantifying survey coverage across diverse landscapes , 2022, Wildlife Research.

[3]  A. Margalida,et al.  Effects of free-flight activities on wildlife: a poorly understood issue in conservation , 2021, Environmental Conservation.

[4]  J. Lahoz‐Monfort,et al.  A Comprehensive Overview of Technologies for Species and Habitat Monitoring and Conservation , 2021, Bioscience.

[5]  S. Denman,et al.  Evaluating new technology for biodiversity monitoring: Are drone surveys biased? , 2021, Ecology and evolution.

[6]  Douglas J. Krause,et al.  Drones Minimize Antarctic Predator Responses Relative to Ground Survey Methods: An Appeal for Context in Policy Advice , 2021, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[7]  Michael K. Johnson,et al.  Applications of an unmanned aerial vehicle and thermal‐imaging camera to study ducks nesting over water , 2020 .

[8]  Matthew J.A. Wood,et al.  Applications of digital imaging and analysis in seabird monitoring and research , 2020 .

[9]  J. Donázar,et al.  Integrating vulture social behavior into conservation practice , 2020, The Condor.

[10]  Andrea Santangeli,et al.  Integrating drone-borne thermal imaging with artificial intelligence to locate bird nests on agricultural land , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[11]  B. Arroyo,et al.  Population expansion and breeding success of Bearded Vultures Gypaetus barbatus in the French Pyrenees: results from long‐term population monitoring , 2020 .

[12]  J. Long,et al.  A systematic review of methods for studying the impacts of outdoor recreation on terrestrial wildlife , 2020, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[13]  M. Symonds,et al.  Escape responses of terrestrial and aquatic birds to drones: Towards a code of practice to minimize disturbance , 2020 .

[14]  D. De Rosa,et al.  Assessing the effects of different management scenarios on the conservation of small island vulture populations , 2020, Bird Conservation International.

[15]  A. Margalida,et al.  Prioritizing among removal scenarios for the reintroduction of endangered species: insights from bearded vulture simulation modeling , 2019, Animal Conservation.

[16]  P. López‐López,et al.  Parental investment asymmetries of a globally endangered scavenger: unravelling the role of gender, weather conditions and stage of the nesting cycle , 2019, Bird Study.

[17]  Sergio A. Lambertucci,et al.  Drones as a Threat to Wildlife: YouTube Complements Science in Providing Evidence about Their Effect , 2019, Environmental Conservation.

[18]  Sergio A. Lambertucci,et al.  Monitoring vultures in the 21 st century: The need for standardized protocols , 2019, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[19]  A. Margalida,et al.  Vulture conservation: the case for urgent action , 2019, Bird Conservation International.

[20]  Margarita Mulero-Pázmány,et al.  Drones for Conservation in Protected Areas: Present and Future , 2019, Drones.

[21]  J. Lahoz‐Monfort,et al.  Conservation technology: The next generation , 2018 .

[22]  A. Margalida,et al.  Drivers of daily movement patterns affecting an endangered vulture flight activity , 2018, BMC Ecology.

[23]  Sergio A. Lambertucci,et al.  A three-decade review of telemetry studies on vultures and condors , 2018, Movement ecology.

[24]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Flights of drones over sub-Antarctic seabirds show species- and status-specific behavioural and physiological responses , 2018, Polar Biology.

[25]  R. Rockwell,et al.  Evaluating behavioral responses of nesting lesser snow geese to unmanned aircraft surveys , 2017, Ecology and evolution.

[26]  C. Bilgin,et al.  Nest site selection patterns of a local Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus population in Turkey , 2017 .

[27]  C. Murn,et al.  The Changing Sizes of Critically Endangered White-Backed Vulture Breeding Colonies Around Kimberley, South Africa , 2017, South African Journal of Wildlife Research.

[28]  A. Amar,et al.  Productivity of the declining Bearded Vulture Gypaetus barbatus population in southern Africa§ , 2017 .

[29]  Margarita Mulero-Pázmány,et al.  Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: A systematic review , 2017, PloS one.

[30]  U. Motro,et al.  Breeding Success and its Correlation with Nest-Site Characteristics: A Study of a Griffon Vulture Colony in Gamla, Israel , 2017, Journal of Raptor Research.

[31]  Stephanie B. Borrelle,et al.  Will drones reduce investigator disturbance to surface-nesting seabirds? , 2017 .

[32]  Steffen Oppel,et al.  Landscape factors affecting territory occupancy and breeding success of Egyptian Vultures on the Balkan Peninsula , 2017, Journal of Ornithology.

[33]  A. Margalida,et al.  Spatial and temporal movements in Pyrenean bearded vultures (Gypaetus barbatus): Integrating movement ecology into conservation practice , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[34]  A. Bond,et al.  Rapid population estimate of a surface-nesting seabird on a remote island using a low-cost unmanned aerial vehicle , 2016 .

[35]  M. Carrete,et al.  Ecosystem Services Provided by Avian Scavengers , 2016 .

[36]  H. Peter,et al.  Measuring the influence of unmanned aerial vehicles on Adélie penguins , 2016, Polar Biology.

[37]  James H. Junda,et al.  Nest defense behaviour of four raptor species (osprey, bald eagle, ferruginous hawk, and red-tailed hawk) to a novel aerial intruder – a small rotary-winged drone , 2016 .

[38]  Paige E. F. Adams,et al.  Drones for conservation. , 2016 .

[39]  Paul G. McDonald,et al.  Evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle shape, flight path and camera type for waterfowl surveys: disturbance effects and species recognition , 2016, PeerJ.

[40]  Jarrod C Hodgson,et al.  Precision wildlife monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicles , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[41]  A. Margalida,et al.  How do colonial Eurasian Griffon Vultures prevent extra-pair mating? , 2016, PeerJ.

[42]  J. Bańbura,et al.  Effects of human-related disturbance on breeding success of urban and non-urban blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) , 2016, Urban Ecosystems.

[43]  P. P. Olea,et al.  Livestock-driven land use change to model species distributions: Egyptian vulture as a case study , 2015 .

[44]  James H. Junda,et al.  Proper flight technique for using a small rotary- winged drone aircraft to safely, quickly, and accurately survey raptor nests , 2015 .

[45]  Paul A. Iaizzo,et al.  Bears Show a Physiological but Limited Behavioral Response to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2015, Current Biology.

[46]  Robert Fitch,et al.  Online Localization of Radio-Tagged Wildlife with an Autonomous Aerial Robot System , 2015, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[47]  J. Wolf,et al.  Low‐budget ready‐to‐fly unmanned aerial vehicles: an effective tool for evaluating the nesting status of canopy‐breeding bird species , 2015 .

[48]  D. Bird,et al.  Population Census of a Large Common Tern Colony with a Small Unmanned Aircraft , 2015, PloS one.

[49]  David Grémillet,et al.  Approaching birds with drones: first experiments and ethical guidelines , 2015, Biology Letters.

[50]  J. González‐Oreja,et al.  Effective conservation measures to mitigate the impact of human disturbances on the endangered Egyptian vulture , 2014 .

[51]  M. Carrete,et al.  Humans and Scavengers: The Evolution of Interactions and Ecosystem Services , 2014 .

[52]  Margarita Mulero-Pázmány,et al.  A low cost way for assessing bird risk hazards in power lines: Fixed-wing small unmanned aircraft systems , 2014 .

[53]  E. Yamac,et al.  Population size and breeding success of the Cinereous Vulture, Aegypius monachus, in a newly found breeding area in western Anatolia (Aves: Falconiformes) , 2013 .

[54]  A. Margalida,et al.  Influence of Environmental Factors on the Breeding Success of Cinereous Vultures Aegypius monachus , 2013 .

[55]  Karen Anderson,et al.  Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology , 2013 .

[56]  Airam Rodríguez,et al.  The Eye in the Sky: Combined Use of Unmanned Aerial Systems and GPS Data Loggers for Ecological Research and Conservation of Small Birds , 2012, PloS one.

[57]  Martin Israel.  A UAV-BASED ROE DEER FAWN DETECTION SYSTEM , 2012 .

[58]  A. Hobday.  Too close for comfort: contentious issues in human-wildlife encounters , 2012 .

[59]  D. Bird,et al.  Evaluation of an off-the-shelf Unmanned Aircraft System for Surveying Flocks of Geese , 2012 .

[60]  Josiane Zerubia,et al.  An automatic counter for aerial images of aggregations of large birds , 2011 .

[61]  Beatriz Arroyo,et al.  Reconciling the conservation of endangered species with economically important anthropogenic activities: interactions between cork exploitation and the cinereous vulture in Spain , 2011 .

[62]  D. Oro,et al.  A systematic review of the effects of recreational activities on nesting birds of prey , 2010 .

[63]  S. Xirouchakis.  Breeding biology and reproductive performance of Griffon Vultures Gyps fulvus on the island of Crete (Greece) , 2010 .

[64]  Pedro P. Olea,et al.  The role of traditional farming practices in ecosystem conservation: The case of transhumance and vultures , 2009 .

[65]  J. Zabala,et al.  Effect of human activities on Egyptian vulture breeding success , 2008 .

[66]  W. F. Boer,et al.  Population dynamics and spatial distribution of Griffon Vultures (Gyps fulvus) in Portugal , 2008, Bird Conservation International.

[67]  Konstantinos Poirazidis,et al.  Range use of a Eurasian black vulture (Aegypius monachus) population in the Dadia‐Lefkimi‐Soufli National Park and the adjacent areas, Thrace, NE Greece , 2008 .

[68]  P. P. Olea,et al.  Egyptian Vultures (Neophron percnopterus) Attack Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) to Defend their Fledgling , 2007 .

[69]  Antoni Margalida,et al.  Factors influencing the breeding density of Bearded Vultures, Egyptian Vultures and Eurasian Griffon Vultures in Catalonia (NE Spain): management implications , 2007, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation.

[70]  M. Carrete,et al.  Habitat, human pressure, and social behavior: Partialling out factors affecting large-scale territory extinction in an endangered vulture , 2007 .

[71]  J. Gill.  Approaches to measuring the effects of human disturbance on birds , 2007 .

[72]  M. Mylonas,et al.  Breeding behaviour and parental care in the Griffon Vulture Gyps fulvus on the island of Crete (Greece) , 2007 .

[73]  B. Arroyo,et al.  Effect of human activities on bearded vulture behaviour and breeding success in the French Pyrenees , 2006 .

[74]  B. Arroyo,et al.  Effect of human activities on the behaviour of breeding Spanish imperial eagles (Aquila adalberti): management implications for the conservation of a threatened species , 2006 .

[75]  R. Morán-López,et al.  Nest‐site selection of endangered cinereous vulture (Aegypius monachus) populations affected by anthropogenic disturbance: present and future conservation implications , 2006 .

[76]  A. Margalida,et al.  Territorial defence and agonistic behaviour of breeding bearded vultures Gypaetus barbatus toward conspecifics and heterospecifics , 2005 .

[77]  G. Stamou,et al.  Modelling nesting habitat as a conservation tool for the Eurasian black vulture (Aegypius monachus) in Dadia Nature Reserve, northeastern Greece , 2004 .

[78]  M. Sarà,et al.  Factors influencing the distribution, abundance and nest‐site selection of an endangered Egyptian vulture (Neophron percnopterus) population in Sicily , 2003 .

[79]  A. Margalida,et al.  Breeding biology and success of the Bearded Vulture Gypaetus barbatus in the eastern Pyrenees , 2003 .

[80]  P. Ingold,et al.  Modelling the impact of different forms of wildlife harassment, exemplified by a quantitative comparison of the effects of hikers and paragliders on feeding and space use of chamois Rupicapra rupicapra , 2003, Wildlife Biology.

[81]  J. Donázar,et al.  Effects of forestry and other land-use practices on the conservation of cinereous vultures , 2002 .

[82]  J. Shephard.  Raptors of the World , 2002 .

[83]  V. Penteriani,et al.  A long-term analysis of the declining population of the Egyptian vulture in the Italian peninsula: distribution, habitat preference, productivity and conservation implications , 2001 .

[84]  A. Margalida,et al.  Nest use, interspecific relationships and competition for nests in the Bearded Vulture Gypaetus barbatus in the Pyrenees: influence on breeding success , 1999 .

[85]  C. Perrins,et al.  Birds of the Western Palearctic , 1978, Nature.

[86]  Isla Duporge,et al.  Analysing the use of remote sensing a geospatial technology to combat wildlife crime in East and Southern Africa , 2016 .

[87]  Sharon Dulava.  Fine-scale change detection using unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) to inform reproductive biology in nesting Waterbirds , 2016 .

[88]  ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ БЕСПИЛОТНИКОВ,et al.  Usage of UAV for Surveying Steller’s Sea Eagle Nests , 2014 .

[89]  Johan Bergenas,et al.  The other side of drones : saving wildlife in Africa and managing global crime , 2013 .

[90]  S. Gomáriz,et al.  Fine-scale bird monitoring from light unmanned aircraft systems , 2012 .

[91]  J. Donázar,et al.  Long‐term relationship between diet breadth and breeding success in a declining population of Egyptian Vultures Neophron percnopterus , 2012 .

[92]  M. Price.  The impact of human disturbance on birds: a selective review , 2008 .

[93]  Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät.  Behavioral and Physiological Effects in Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) Caused by Human Disturbance , 2007 .

[94]  J. Bertran,et al.  NEST -BUILDING BEHAVIOUR OF THE BEARDED VULTURE , 2006 .

[95]  A. Margalida,et al.  Territorial behavior of Bearded Vultures in response to Griffon Vultures , 2002 .

[96]  Joan Bertran,et al.  NEST -BUILDING BEHAVIOUR OF THE BEARDED VULTURE GYPAETUS BARBATU S , 2000 .

[97]  R. Schnidrig-Petrig.  The icarus problem : Scientific facts and tested solutions , 1998 .

[98]  J. Fargallo.  Forest management effects on nesting habitat selected by Eurasian Black Vultures (Aegypius monachus) in central Spain , 1998 .

[99]  Fernando Hiraldo,et al.  Factors Influencing Nest Site Selection, Breeding Density and Breeding Success in the Bearded Vulture (Gypaetus barbatus) , 1993 .

[100]  Clayton M. White,et al.  ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE USE OF ROTOR-WINGED AIRCRAFT IN RAPTOR SURVEYS , 1973 .