A comparative study at 3 T of sequence dependence of T2 quantitation in the knee.

OBJECTIVE T2 mapping has been used widely in detecting cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis. Several scanning sequences have been developed in the determination of T2 relaxation times of tissues. However, the derivation of these times may vary from sequence to sequence. This study seeks to evaluate the sequence-dependent differences in T2 quantitation of cartilage, muscle, fat and bone marrow in the knee joint at 3 T. METHODS Three commercial phantoms and 10 healthy volunteers were studied using 3 T MR. T2 relaxation times of the phantoms, cartilage, muscle, subcutaneous fat and marrow were derived using spin echo (SE), multiecho SE (MESE), fast SE (FSE) with varying echo train length (ETL), spiral and spoiler gradient (SPGR) sequences. The differences between these times were then evaluated using Student's t test. In addition, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) efficiency and coefficient of variation of T2 from each sequence were calculated. RESULTS The average T2 relaxation time was 36.38+/-5.76 ms in cartilage and 34.08+/-6.55 ms in muscle, ranging from 27 to 45 ms in both tissues. The times for subcutaneous fat and marrow were longer and more varying, ranging from 41 to 143 ms and from 42 to 160 ms, respectively. In FSE acquisition, relaxation time significantly increases as ETL increases (P<.05). In cartilage, the SE acquisition yields the lowest T2 values (27.52+/-3.10 ms), which is significantly lower than those obtained from other sequences (P<.002). T2 values obtained from spiral acquisition (38.27+/-6.45 ms) were higher than those obtained from MESE (34.35+/-5.62 ms) and SPGR acquisition (31.64+/-4.53 ms). These differences, however, were not significant (P>.05). CONCLUSION T2 quantification can be a valuable tool for the diagnosis of degenerative disease. Several different sequences exist to quantify the relaxation times of tissues. Sequences range in scan time, SNR efficiency, reproducibility and two- or three-dimensional mapping. However, when choosing a sequence for quantitation, it is important to realize that several factors affect the measured T2 relaxation time.

[1]  N. Rofsky,et al.  MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. , 2004, Radiology.

[2]  J Huston,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla: initial clinical experience. , 2001, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[3]  T J Mosher,et al.  Human articular cartilage: influence of aging and early symptomatic degeneration on the spatial variation of T2--preliminary findings at 3 T. , 2000, Radiology.

[4]  H. Potter,et al.  T2 quantitation of articular cartilage at 1.5 T , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  C. S. Poon,et al.  Practical T2 quantitation for clinical applications , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  J. Gore,et al.  Errors in the measurements of T2 using multiple‐echo MRI techniques. II. Effects of static field inhomogeneity , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  T. Schnitzer,et al.  Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs arthroscopy. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  T2 Quantitation of Human Articular Cartilage in a Clinical Setting at 1.5 T: Implementation and Testing of Four Multiecho Pulse Sequence Designs for Validity , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[9]  Graham Wright,et al.  Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  S. Majumdar,et al.  T2 relaxation time of cartilage at MR imaging: comparison with severity of knee osteoarthritis. , 2004, Radiology.

[11]  S. Free,et al.  T2 Relaxometry of the Hippocampus at 3T , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[12]  S Majumdar,et al.  MRI-derived T2 relaxation times and cartilage morphometry of the tibio-femoral joint in subjects with and without osteoarthritis during a 1-year follow-up. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[13]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  T2 relaxation time measurements in osteoarthritis. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences. , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[15]  T. Foster,et al.  A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. , 1984, Medical physics.

[16]  J C Gore,et al.  Errors in the measurements of T2 using multiple‐echo MRI techniques. I. Effects of radiofrequency pulse imperfections , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.