Tracking the time course of lexical access in orthographic production: An event-related potential study of word frequency effects in written picture naming

Previous studies of spoken picture naming using event-related potentials (ERPs) have shown that speakers initiate lexical access within 200ms after stimulus onset. In the present study, we investigated the time course of lexical access in written, rather than spoken, word production. Chinese participants wrote target object names which varied in word frequency, and written naming times and ERPs were measured. Writing latencies exhibited a classical frequency effect (faster responses for high- than for low-frequency names). More importantly, ERP results revealed that electrophysiological activity elicited by high- and low frequency target names started to diverge as early as 168ms post picture onset. We conclude that lexical access during written word production is initiated within 200ms after picture onset. This estimate is compatible with previous studies on spoken production which likewise showed a rapid onset of lexical access (i.e., within 200ms after stimuli onset). We suggest that written and spoken word production share the lexicalization stage.

[1]  F.-Xavier Alario,et al.  Frequency effects in noun phrase production: Implications for models of lexical access , 2002 .

[2]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[3]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. , 2002, British journal of psychology.

[4]  Albert Costa,et al.  Conscious intention to speak proactively facilitates lexical access during overt object naming. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[5]  A. Paivio,et al.  Cognitive components of picture naming. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  D. Guthrie,et al.  Significance testing of difference potentials. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[7]  R. Peereman,et al.  Masked form priming in writing words from pictures: evidence for direct retrieval of orthographic codes. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[8]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures: Effects of Age of Acquisition, Frequency, and Name Agreement , 1997 .

[9]  A. Caramazza.  How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[10]  Andrea Valente,et al.  Time course of word production in fast and slow speakers: A high density ERP topographic study , 2012, NeuroImage.

[11]  A Caramazza,et al.  The specific-word frequency effect: implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Cyril Perret,et al.  Why are written picture naming latencies (not) longer than spoken naming? , 2013 .

[13]  Jenn-Yeu Chen,et al.  The proximate unit in Chinese handwritten character production , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[14]  Albert Costa,et al.  Riding the Lexical Speedway: A Critical Review on the Time Course of Lexical Selection in Speech Production , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[15]  Richard J. S. Wise,et al.  The Contribution of the Parietal Lobes to Speaking and Writing , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  A tale of two frequencies: Determining the speed of lexical access for Mandarin Chinese and English compounds , 2008 .

[17]  Albert Costa,et al.  When does word frequency influence written production? , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[18]  W. Levelt,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form , 1994 .

[19]  G. Altmann,et al.  Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives - Workshop Overview , 1989, AI Mag..

[20]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000 .

[21]  Dominique Cardebat,et al.  Electrophysiological comparison of grammatical processing and semantic processing of single spoken nouns. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[23]  Albert Costa,et al.  The time course of word retrieval revealed by event-related brain potentials during overt speech , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  W. Levelt,et al.  Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words , 2001, Cognition.

[25]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access , 1991 .

[26]  Cyril Perret,et al.  Comparison of Electrophysiological Correlates of Writing and Speaking: A Topographic ERP Analysis , 2011, Brain Topography.

[27]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The Autonomy of Lexical Orthography , 1997 .

[28]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[29]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[30]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[31]  P. Wojtkowski.  Temporal Dynamics , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[32]  Antje S Meyer,et al.  Specific-word frequency is not all that counts in speech production: comments on Caramazza, Costa, et al. (2001) and new experimental data. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  J. Kroll,et al.  Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations , 1994 .

[34]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The locus of the frequency effect in picture naming: When recognizing is not enough , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  A. Cutler.  Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? , 1981, Cognition.

[36]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[37]  M. Fayol,et al.  Age of Acquisition and Word Frequency in Written Picture Naming , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[38]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Timed picture naming in seven languages , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  A Wingfield,et al.  Response Latencies in Naming Objects , 1965, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[41]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Constraint, Word Frequency, and the Relationship between Lexical Processing Levels in Spoken Word Production , 1998 .

[42]  R. Peereman,et al.  For a psycholinguistic model of handwriting production: testing the syllable-bigram controversy. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Where Do Semantic Errors Come From? , 1990, Cortex.

[44]  Judith F. Kroll,et al.  Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions , 1984 .

[45]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory ☆ , 1991 .

[46]  Peter Indefrey,et al.  The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components: A Critical Update , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[47]  Ping Li,et al.  Timed Picture Naming Norms for Mandarin Chinese , 2011, PloS one.

[48]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  Frequency effects in the written and spoken production of homophonic picture names , 2002 .

[49]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[51]  Franck Vidal,et al.  Response planning in word typing: evidence for inhibition. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[52]  Albert Costa,et al.  Tracking lexical access in speech production: electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[53]  M. Laganaro,et al.  Exploring the multiple-level hypothesis of AoA effects in spoken and written object naming using a topographic ERP analysis , 2014, Brain and Language.

[54]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[55]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[56]  M. Fayol,et al.  Writing words from pictures: What representations are activated, and when? , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[57]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  An MEG Study of Picture Naming , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  M. Damian,et al.  Phonology Contributes to Writing , 2011, Psychological science.

[59]  Juan Segui,et al.  Predictors of picture naming speed , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[60]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The production of pronominal clitics: Implications for theories of lexical access , 2006 .

[61]  Albert Costa,et al.  The temporal dynamics of first versus second language production , 2013, Brain and Language.

[62]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[63]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  The retrieval of phonological forms in production: tests of predictions from a connectionist model , 1988 .

[64]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Picture naming and word frequency: Comments on Alario, Costa and Caramazza, Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(3), 299-319 , 2002 .

[65]  J. Carroll,et al.  Word Frequency and Age of Acquisition as Determiners of Picture-Naming Latency , 1973 .

[66]  C. Buss,et al.  Children's Brain Development Benefits from Longer Gestation , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[67]  W. Levelt,et al.  Semantic Category Interference in Overt Picture Naming: Sharpening Current Density Localization by PCA , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[68]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[69]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.