Integrating Acquired Capabilities: When Structural Integration is (Un)Necessary

Acquirers who buy small technology-based firms for their technological capabilities often discover that postmerger integration can destroy the very innovative capabilities that made the acquired organization attractive in the first place. Viewing structural integration as a mechanism to achieve coordination between acquirer and target organizations helps explain why structural integration may be necessary in technology acquisitions despite the costs of disruption this imposes, as well as the conditions under which it becomes less (or un-) necessary. We show that interdependence motivates structural integration but that preexisting common ground offers acquirers an alternate path to achieving coordination, which may be less disruptive than structural integration.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Landscape Design: Designing for Local Action in Complex Worlds , 1999 .

[2]  Sanjaya Lall,et al.  The Multinational Corporation , 1980 .

[3]  Beth A. Bechky.  Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[4]  A. Pemberton.  Does it Pay? , 1922, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[5]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance , 1987 .

[6]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements , 2002 .

[7]  A. Arora,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES: THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY* , 1990 .

[8]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[9]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms , 2000 .

[10]  G. Hoetker.  The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues , 2007 .

[11]  A. Heifetz.  Rational Ritual: Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge. , 2004 .

[12]  Colin F. Camerer,et al.  Coordination in Organizations: A Game-Theoretic Perspective , 1996 .

[13]  R. Gulati,et al.  The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[14]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[15]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: post‐acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers , 2004 .

[16]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[17]  Margarethe F. Wiersema,et al.  Modelling limited dependent variables: methods and guidelines for researchers in strategic management , 2003 .

[18]  Amy L. Pablo.  Determinants of acquisition integration level: A decision-making perspective. , 1994 .

[19]  D. Teece.  Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation☆ , 1996 .

[20]  Nicholas Argyres,et al.  Technology strategy, governance structure and interdivisional coordination , 1995 .

[21]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[22]  John W. Clarr.  Cooperative Strategies in International Business , 1990 .

[23]  C. Ai,et al.  Interaction terms in logit and probit models , 2003 .

[24]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Disentangling the Theories of Firm Boundaries: A Path Model and Empirical Test , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[25]  H. Demsetz.  The Theory of the Firm Revisited , 1988 .

[26]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Acquisition Integration and Productivity Losses in the Technical Core: Disruption of Inventors in Acquired Companies , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[27]  P. Rosenzweig.  Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal , 1991 .

[28]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Organizing for Innovation , 1986 .

[29]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Resetting the Clock: The Dynamics of Organizational Change and Failure. , 1990 .

[30]  Holger Ernst,et al.  The Influence of Corporate Acquisitions on the Behaviour of Key Inventors , 2000 .

[31]  R. Gulati,et al.  Adaptation in Vertical Relationships: Beyond Incentive Conflict , 2005 .

[32]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Cooperative Versus Competitive Structures in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms , 1992 .

[33]  B. Tabrizi,et al.  Capturing the real value in high-tech acquisitions. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[34]  J. Harrison,et al.  Manufacturing-based relatedness, synergy, and coordination , 1999 .

[35]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .

[36]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[37]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Coordination, Organizational Boundaries and Fads in Business Practices , 1996 .

[38]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[39]  Phanish Puranam,et al.  Choosing Equity Stakes in Technology-Sourcing Relationships: An Integrative Framework , 2004 .

[40]  Lars Schweizer.  ORGANIZATIONAL INTEGRATION OF ACQUIRED BIOTECHNOLOGY COMPANIES INTO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES: THE NEED FOR A HYBRID APPROACH , 2005 .

[41]  Constantinos C. Markides,et al.  Corporate Diversification And Organizational Structure: A Resource-Based View , 1996 .

[42]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Bridging Contested Terrain: Linking Incentive-Based and Learning Perspectives on Organizational Evolution , 2003 .

[43]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[44]  Lars Stole,et al.  Distortion and Risk in Optimal Incentive Contracts , 2002 .

[45]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  The Size Distribution of Innovating Firms in the UK: 1945-1983 , 1987 .

[46]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[47]  Nancy A. Staudenmayer,et al.  Coordination Neglect: How Lay Theories of Organizing Complicate Coordination in Organizations , 2000 .

[48]  T. J. Gerpott.  Successful integration of R&D functions after acquisitions: An exploratory empirical study , 1995 .

[49]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  A Bird in the Hand or Two in the Bush?: Integration Trade-offs in Technology-grafting Acquisitions , 2003 .

[50]  G. Hoetker.  Do Modular Products Lead to Modular Organizations , 2006 .

[51]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[52]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[53]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[54]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Organizing for Innovation: Managing the Coordination-Autonomy Dilemma in Technology Acquisitions , 2006 .

[55]  H. Ibarra.  NETWORK CENTRALITY, POWER, AND INNOVATION INVOLVEMENT: DETERMINANTS OF TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ROLES , 1993 .

[56]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[57]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Resource Sharing Among Sbus: Strategic Antecedents and Administrative Implications , 1986 .

[58]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[59]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[60]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations , 2004 .

[61]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[62]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Technological Accumulation, Diversification and Organisation in UK Companies, 1945-1983 , 1989 .

[63]  James F. Fairbank,et al.  Internalizing external technology: A model of governance mode choice and an empirical assessment , 1999 .

[64]  Steven Postrel,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Islands of Shared Knowledge: Specialization and Mutual Understanding in Problem-Solving Teams , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[65]  Zur Shapira,et al.  Organizational decision making: Preference processing , 1996 .

[66]  Melissa E. Graebner.  MOMENTUM AND SERENDIPITY: HOW ACQUIRED LEADERS CREATE VALUE IN THE INTEGRATION OF TECHNOLOGY FIRMS. , 2003 .

[67]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[68]  Yves L. Doz,et al.  Technology Partnerships between Larger and Smaller Firms: Some Critical Issues , 1987 .

[69]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Task Contingent Model of Work-Unit Structure. , 1974 .

[70]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Does it pay to acquire technological firms , 1994 .

[71]  C. Bartlett,et al.  The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network , 1990 .

[72]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Theories of Economic Organization: The Case for Realism and Balance , 1996 .

[73]  R. Coile.  Competing by design. , 2002, Physician executive.

[74]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[75]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks : Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2007 .

[76]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  The Acquisition of Technology and Small Firms by Large Firms , 1990 .

[77]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  The Impact of Knowledge Codification, Experience Trajectories and Integration Strategies on the Performance of Corporate Acquisitions , 1998 .

[78]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[79]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  The Influence of Organizational Acquisition Experience on Acquisition Performance: A Behavioral Learning Perspective , 1999 .

[80]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[81]  A. Seth.  Sources of value creation in acquisitions: An empirical investigation , 1990 .

[82]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Knowledge Codification, Process Routinization and the Creation of Organizational Capabilities: Post-Acquisition Management in the US Banking Industry , 1998 .

[83]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Managing the Post-acquisition Integration Process: How the Human Iintegration and Task Integration Processes Interact to Foster Value Creation , 2000 .

[84]  Milton Harris,et al.  Organization Design , 2000, Manag. Sci..

[85]  C. Perrow.  Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay , 1975 .

[86]  P. Puranam,et al.  What They Know vs. What They Do: How Acquirers Leverage Technology Acquisitions , 2007 .

[87]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Explaining Organizational Diseconomies of Scale in R&D: Agency Problems and the Allocation of Engineering Talent, Ideas, and Effort by Firm Size , 1994 .

[88]  Annette L. Ranft,et al.  Acquiring New Technologies and Capabilities: A Grounded Model of Acquisition Implementation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[89]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[90]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[91]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  Relationships Between Type of Acquisition, The Autonomy Given to the Acquired Firm, and Acquisition Success: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[92]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in 5's: A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design , 1980, Management Science.

[93]  D. Krackhardt.  Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[94]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Competing by design: the power of organizational architecture , 1998 .

[95]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .