Analysis of synchronization performance in redundant networks for substation automation

In modern real-time Ethernet networks for substation automation, several protocols are adopted to guarantee the strict synchronization and availability requirements imposed by applications. The management of these networks is more and more complex, since several (cross-influencing) configuration parameters affect the performance of the overall system. In this paper the attention has been focused on synchronization systems applied to redundant network infrastructures for substation automation: in these systems the reconfiguration of the network after a fault may affect the synchronization performance of the nodes. As a test case the SNTP (Simple Network Time Protocol) synchronization has been simulated (with different fault conditions) using two network topologies typically adopted in Substation Automation Systems: RSTP (Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol) and PRP (Parallel Redundancy Protocol). The performance of the two cases has been compared by means of suitable metrics: PRP, as opposed to RSTP, guarantees seamless synchronization performance in case of a single fault.

[1]  Gunnar Prytz,et al.  Redundant and synchronized EtherCAT network , 2010, International Symposium on Industrial Embedded System (SIES).

[2]  Daniele Marioli,et al.  A Distributed Instrument for Performance Analysis of Real-Time Ethernet Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[3]  Duncan A. Campbell,et al.  Use of Precision Time Protocol to Synchronize Sampled-Value Process Buses , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[4]  G. Gaderer,et al.  Evaluation of clock synchronization accuracy of coexistent Real-Time Ethernet protocols , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Precision Clock Synchronization for Measurement, Control and Communication.

[5]  Andrea Bondavalli,et al.  Experimental Characterization of Uncertainty Sources in a Software-Only Synchronization System , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[6]  Gunnar Prytz.  Network recovery time measurements of RSTP in an ethernet ring topology , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (EFTA 2007).

[7]  Thilo Sauter,et al.  Achieving a Realistic Notion of Time in Discrete Event Simulation , 2011, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[8]  A. Flammini,et al.  Testing coexistence of different RTE protocols in the same network , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems.

[9]  Alessandra Flammini,et al.  Evaluation of Time Gateways for Synchronization of Substation Automation Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[10]  T.S. Sidhu,et al.  Modelling and Simulation for Performance Evaluation of IEC61850-Based Substation Communication Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[11]  Thomas C. Schmidt,et al.  An extension of the OMNeT++ INET framework for simulating real-time ethernet with high accuracy , 2011, SimuTools.

[12]  Alessandra Flammini,et al.  Mixing Real Time Ethernet traffic on the IEC 61850 Process bus , 2012, 2012 9th IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems.

[13]  G. Gaderer,et al.  Limits of synchronization accuracy using hardware support in IEEE 1588 , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Precision Clock Synchronization for Measurement, Control and Communication.

[14]  Alessandra Flammini,et al.  An IEC 61850-Compliant distributed PMU for electrical substations , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS) Proceedings.

[15]  Alessandra Flammini,et al.  On the Use of IEEE 1588 in Existing IEC 61850-Based SASs: Current Behavior and Future Challenges , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.