Modeling the electric image produced by objects with complex impedance in weakly electric fish

Weakly electric fish generate an electric field around their body by electric organ discharge (EOD). By measuring the modulation of the electric field produced by an object in the field these fish are able to accurately locate an object. Theoretical and experimental studies have focused on the amplitude modulations of EODs produced by resistive objects. However, little is known about the phase modulations produced by objects with complex impedance. The fish must be able to detect changes in object impedance to discriminate between food and nonfood objects. To investigate the features of electric images produced by objects with complex impedance, we developed a model that can be used to map the electric field around the fish body. The present model allows us to calculate the spatial distribution of the amplitude and phase shift in an electric image. This is the first study to investigate the changes in amplitude and phase shift of electric images induced by objects with complex impedance in wave-type fish. Using the model, we show that the amplitude of the electric image exhibits a sigmoidal change as the capacitance and resistance of an object are increased. Similarly, the phase shift exhibits a significant change within the object capacitance range of 0.1–100 nF. We also show that the spatial distribution of the amplitude and phase shifts of the electric image resembles a “Mexican hat” in shape for varying object distances and sizes. The spatial distribution of the phase shift and the amplitude was dependent on the object distance and size. Changes in the skin capacitance were associated with a tradeoff relationship between the magnitude of the amplitude and phase shift of the electric image. The specific range of skin capacitance (1–100 nF) allows the receptor afferents to extract object features that are relevant to electrolocation. These results provide a useful basis for the study of the neural mechanisms by which weakly electric fish recognize object features such as distance, size, and impedance.

[1]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Differential responses of two types of electroreceptive afferents to signal distortions may permit capacitance measurement in a weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii , 1992, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[2]  B. Rasnow,et al.  The effects of simple objects on the electric field of Apteronotus , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  Yoshiki Kashimori,et al.  A role of synchronicity of neural activity based on dynamic plasticity of synapses in encoding spatiotemporal features of electrosensory stimuli. , 2006, Mathematical biosciences.

[4]  F. St. John Lacy,et al.  The Electric Organ , 1891 .

[5]  J. E. Lewis,et al.  Neuronal Population Codes and the Perception of Object Distance in Weakly Electric Fish , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  M. A. MacIver,et al.  Prey capture in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus albifrons: sensory acquisition strategies and electrosensory consequences. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  M Konishi,et al.  Listening with two ears. , 1993, Scientific American.

[8]  Yoshiki Kashimori,et al.  Population coding of electrosensory stimulus in receptor network , 2006, Neurocomputing.

[9]  B Rasnow,et al.  Electric organ discharges and electric images during electrolocation. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  Joseph G. Hoffman,et al.  Physical Techniques in Biological Research , 1963 .

[11]  G. von der Emde,et al.  Capacitance detection in the wave-type electric fish Eigenmannia during active electrolocation , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Neural Nets in Electric Fish , 1991 .

[13]  B. Ronacher,et al.  Perception of electric properties of objects in electrolocating weakly electric fish: two-dimensional similarity scaling reveals a City-Block metric , 1994, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[14]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Electrolocation of objects in the electric fishEigenmannia (Rhamphichthyidae, Gymnotoidei) , 1973, Journal of comparative physiology.

[15]  D. B. Dusenbery.  Sensory Ecology: How Organisms Acquire and Respond to Information , 1992 .

[16]  Mark E. Nelson,et al.  Modeling signal and background components of electrosensory scenes , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[17]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Theoretical and experimental approaches to spatial aspects of electrolocation , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[18]  K. Grant,et al.  The electric image in Gnathonemus petersii , 2002, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[19]  L. Wilkens,et al.  Paddlefish strike at artificial dipoles simulating the weak electric fields of planktonic prey. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[20]  M. Bacher,et al.  A new method for the simulation of electric fields, generated by electric fish, and their distorsions by objects , 1983, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  Adriana Migliaro,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of Pre-Receptor Image Conditioning in Weakly Electric Fish , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  B. Rasnow,et al.  The electric organ discharges of the gymnotiform fishes: I. Apteronotus leptorhynchus , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[23]  Winfried Wojtenek,et al.  Primary afferent electrosensory neurons represent paddlefish natural prey , 2001, Neurocomputing.

[24]  C. Bell,et al.  The electric image in weakly electric fish: physical images of resistive objects in Gnathonemus petersii. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  Eric I. Knudsen,et al.  Spatial aspects of the electric fields generated by weakly electric fish , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.

[26]  Angel A. Caputi,et al.  The electric image in weakly electric fish: I. A data-based model of waveform generation inGymnotus carapo , 1995, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[27]  Herman P. Schwan,et al.  CHAPTER 6 – DETERMINATION OF BIOLOGICAL IMPEDANCES1 , 1963 .

[28]  K. E. Machin,et al.  The Mechanism of Object Location in Gymnarchus Niloticus and Similar Fish , 1958 .

[29]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Distance and shape: perception of the 3-dimensional world by weakly electric fish , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[30]  N. Hoshimiya,et al.  TheApteronotus EOD field: Waveform and EOD field simulation , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[31]  Christopher Assad,et al.  Electric field maps and boundary element simulations of electrolocation in weakly electric fish , 1997 .

[32]  André Longtin,et al.  Modeling the electric field of weakly electric fish , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[33]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  The handbook of brain theory and neural networks , 1995, A Bradford book.

[34]  Mark E. Nelson,et al.  Modeling Electrosensory and Mechanosensory Images during the Predatory Behavior of Weakly Electric Fish , 2002, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[35]  Yehuda Albeck.  Sound localization and binaural processing , 1998 .

[36]  Yoshiki Kashimori,et al.  Spatiotemporal burst coding for extracting features of spatiotemporally varying stimuli , 2007, Biological Cybernetics.

[37]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Discrimination of objects through electrolocation in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[38]  A. Caputi,et al.  The electric image in weakly electric fish: perception of objects of complex impedance. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[39]  B. Rasnow,et al.  The electric organ discharges of the gymnotiform fishes: II. Eigenmannia , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[40]  André Longtin,et al.  Spatial Acuity and Prey Detection in Weakly Electric Fish , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..