All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices

Spatial heterogeneity of ecological structures originates either from the physical forcing of environmental variables or from community processes. In both cases, spatial structuring plays a functional role in ecosystems. Ecological models should explicitly take into account the spatial structure of ecosystems. In previous work, we used a polynomial function of the geographic coordinates of the sampling sites to model broad-scale spatial variation in a canonical (regression-type) modelling context. In this paper, we propose a method for detecting and quantifying spatial patterns over a wide range of scales. This is obtained by eigenvalue decomposition of a truncated matrix of geographic distances among the sampling sites. The eigenvectors corresponding to positive eigenvalues are used as spatial descriptors in regression or canonical analysis. This method can be applied to any set of sites providing a good coverage of the geographic sampling area. This paper investigates the behaviour of the method using numerical simulations and an artificial pseudo-ecological data set of known properties.

[1]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  An empirical comparison of permutation methods for tests of partial regression coefficients in a linear model , 1999 .

[2]  D. Garbary,et al.  Evolutionary Biogeography of the Marine Algae of the North Atlantic , 1990, NATO ASI Series.

[3]  M. Fortin,et al.  Spatial pattern and ecological analysis , 1989, Vegetatio.

[4]  Karl-Heinz Jöckel,et al.  Bootstrapping and Related Techniques , 1992 .

[5]  P. Legendre.  Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[6]  Ter Braak,et al.  Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user''s guide: software for canonical community ord , 2002 .

[7]  C. Braak,et al.  Permutation Versus Bootstrap Significance Tests in Multiple Regression and Anova , 1992 .

[8]  M. Austin,et al.  On non-linear species response models in ordination , 1976, Vegetatio.

[9]  P. Legendre.  Quantitative Methods and Biogeographic Analysis , 1990 .

[10]  P. Legendre,et al.  Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation , 1992 .

[11]  C. Braak.  Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .

[12]  J. Gower,et al.  Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients , 1986 .

[13]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4) , 1998 .

[14]  Calyampudi R. Rao.  The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research , 1964 .

[15]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  Update notes: Canoco, version 3.10 , 1990 .

[16]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Aquatic heterotrophic bacteria: Modeling in the presence of spatial autocorrelation , 1988 .

[17]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Environmental control and spatial structure in ecological communities: an example using oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatei) , 1994, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[18]  P. Legendre,et al.  Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation: questions and propositions in the linear modelling framework , 1998, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.