Effects of perturbation magnitude and voice F0 level on the pitch-shift reflex.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the responsiveness of the pitch-shift reflex to small magnitude stimuli and voice fundamental frequency (F(0)) level. English speakers received pitch-shifted voice feedback (+/-10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 cents, 200 ms duration) during vowel phonations at a high and a low F(0) level. Mean pitch-shift response magnitude increased as a function of pitch-shift stimulus magnitude, but when expressed as a percent of stimulus magnitude, declined from 100% with +/-10 cents to 37% with +/-50 cents stimuli. Response magnitudes were larger and latencies were shorter with a high F(0) level (16 cents;130 ms) compared to a low F(0) level (13 cents;152 ms). Data from the present study demonstrate that vocal response magnitudes are equal to small perturbation magnitudes, and they are larger and faster with a high F(0) voice. These results suggest that the audio-vocal system is optimally suited for compensating for small pitch rather than larger perturbations. Data also suggest the sensitivity of the audio-vocal system to voice perturbation may vary with F(0) level.

[1]  Jay J Bauer,et al.  Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Thomas M Donath,et al.  Control of voice fundamental frequency in speaking versus singing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  C. Larson,et al.  Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  J. Ohala,et al.  Regulation of register, pitch and intensity of voice. An electromyographic investigation of intrinsic laryngeal muscles. , 1970, Folia phoniatrica.

[5]  Feliks Jaroszyk,et al.  The relationship between latency of auditory evoked potentials, simple reaction time, and stimulus intensity , 1994, Psychological research.

[6]  Y. Horii Fundamental frequency perturbation observed in sustained phonation. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  Thomas M Donath,et al.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Yi Xu,et al.  Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  C. Larson,et al.  Effect of duration of pitch-shifted feedback on vocal responses in patients with Parkinson's disease. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[10]  O. Mimura [Eye movements]. , 1992, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[11]  W. S. Brown,et al.  Comfortable effort level: an experimental variable. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  C. Larson,et al.  Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  M P Gelfer,et al.  Fundamental frequency, intensity, and vowel selection: effects on measures of phonatory stability. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  K. Kalveram,et al.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency of long stressed and unstressed syllables. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[15]  Charles R Larson,et al.  Early pitch-shift response is active in both steady and dynamic voice pitch control. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  D. M. Green,et al.  Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  C. Larson,et al.  Audio-vocal responses to repetitive pitch-shift stimulation during a sustained vocalization: improvements in methodology for the pitch-shifting technique. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Jay J Bauer,et al.  Voice responses to changes in pitch of voice or tone auditory feedback. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  C. Larson,et al.  Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback during English speech. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  C. Larson,et al.  Effects of simultaneous perturbations of voice pitch and loudness feedback on voice F0 and amplitude control. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  T A Burnett,et al.  Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  P. F. Seitz,et al.  Auditory Stimulus Intensity and Reaction Time in Listeners with Longstanding Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[23]  Catherine Semal,et al.  Individual differences in the sensitivity to pitch direction. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.