Closing the gap? : Twitter as an instrument for connected representation

In this chapter, we present a typology of the tweeting behaviour of candidates as a means of analysing the extent to which politicians are harnessing the potential of social media to actively interact with their constituents. Our research, which included content analysis of tweets (n = 13,637) from all the Conservative and Labour tweeting candidates during the 2010 U.K. General Election, focused on four aspects of tweets: type (normal post, interaction, retweet, retweet with comment); interaction (with, e.g. a politician, journalist, citizen); function (e.g. updating, promoting, advice giving, debating); and topic. Additionally, a qualitative reading on the use of personal tweets was carried out. By examining candidates’ tweeting behaviour, we show that British politicians still mainly use Twitter as a unidirectional form of communication. They are neglecting the possibility this social network offers for, what we call, connected representation.

[1]  Nigel Jackson,et al.  Political parties, the Internet and the 2005 General Election: third time lucky? , 2007, Internet Res..

[2]  Darren G. Lilleker,et al.  Towards a More Participatory Style of Election Campaigning: The Impact of Web 2.0 on the UK 2010 General Election , 2010 .

[3]  A. Bruns,et al.  (NOT) THE TWITTER ELECTION , 2012 .

[4]  J. Blumler,et al.  The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy , 2009 .

[5]  J. Golbeck,et al.  Twitter use by the U.S. Congress , 2010 .

[6]  Donley T. Studlar,et al.  One Europe, Many Electorates? , 2007 .

[7]  K. Brants,et al.  Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy: Challenging the Primacy of Politics , 2011 .

[8]  Giles Moss,et al.  Governing at a distance - politicians in the blogosphere , 2008, Inf. Polity.

[9]  M. Broersma,et al.  BETWEEN BROADCASTING POLITICAL MESSAGES AND INTERACTING WITH VOTERS , 2012 .

[10]  B. Loader,et al.  What the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter TAMARA A . SMALL , 2012 .

[11]  Maurice Vergeer,et al.  Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning , 2013 .

[12]  Todd Graham.  What’s Reality Television Got to Do with it? Talking Politics in the Net-Based Public Sphere , 2011 .

[13]  R. Gibson,et al.  Net gain – or net pain ? Political parties and the Internet , 2022 .

[14]  Tamara A. Small.  Canadian Politics in 140 Characters: Party Politics in the Twitterverse , 2010 .

[15]  Anders Olof Larsson,et al.  Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign , 2012, New Media Soc..

[16]  D. Lilleker,et al.  Microblogging, Constituency Service and Impression Management: UK MPs and the Use of Twitter , 2011, The Impact of Legislatures.

[17]  M. Broersma,et al.  SOCIAL MEDIA AS BEAT , 2012 .

[18]  Tamara A. Small.  WHAT THE HASHTAG? , 2011 .