Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis

[1]  M. Boermeester,et al.  Single and combined diagnostic value of clinical features and laboratory tests in acute appendicitis. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[2]  M. Boermeester,et al.  Imaging strategies for detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy study , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  M. Boermeester,et al.  Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. , 2008, Radiology.

[4]  D. Flum,et al.  Negative Appendectomy and Imaging Accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[5]  A. Engel,et al.  Diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults: accuracy of color Doppler sonography and MDCT compared with surgery and clinical follow-up. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  D. Lu,et al.  Effect of CT on false positive diagnosis of appendicitis and perforation. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  M. Boermeester,et al.  Optimization of diagnostic imaging use in patients with acute abdominal pain (OPTIMA): Design and rationale , 2007, BMC emergency medicine.

[8]  B. Nan,et al.  Incidence of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Arturo Brunetti,et al.  CT appearance of the normal appendix in adults , 2005, European Radiology.

[10]  R. Halvorsen,et al.  Helical CT evaluation of acute right lower quadrant pain: part I, common mimics of appendicitis. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Orna Aizenstein,et al.  Why we miss the diagnosis of appendicitis on abdominal CT: evaluation of imaging features of appendicitis incorrectly diagnosed on CT. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Jean-Michel Bruel,et al.  Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. , 2004, Radiology.

[13]  D. Rappaport,et al.  Frequency of visualization and thickness of normal appendix at nonenhanced helical CT. , 2002, Radiology.

[14]  Soumitra R. Eachempati,et al.  Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis. , 2000, Surgery.

[15]  R. Novelline,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  M Rioux,et al.  Sonographic detection of the normal and abnormal appendix. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  R. Tauxe,et al.  The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[18]  R. Halvorsen,et al.  Helical CT evaluation of acute right lower quadrant pain: part II, uncommon mimics of appendicitis. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.