Group Formation in Mobile Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Contexts: A Systematic Literature Review

Introduction Collaborative Learning (CL) represents an essential educational approach defined by Dillenbourg as "a situation, in which two or more people learn or attempt to learn something together" (Dillenbourg, 1999). Henri and Lundgren-Cayrol (2001) consider CL as an active process by which the learner is working on the construction of knowledge, the instructor plays the role of facilitator of learning, and the group participates as a source of information, as a motivator, as a mean of self-help and mutual support, and as a preferred place of interaction for collective construction of knowledge. Many researchers demonstrated how CL is useful for improving the cognitive, psychological, and social development of learners (Dillenbourg, 1999; Zurita et al., 2005). The development of information and communication technologies has led to the emergence of e-learning. It is a kind of learning based principally on the use of computers for constructing and delivering knowledge. Education researchers began then to search how to benefit from this technological evolution to improve the CL pedagogies. As result, since the late 1990s, a new branch of collaborative learning called Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) has emerged. Furthermore, the rapid development of wireless communication and mobile technologies enabled the emergence of a new form of learning termed M-learning. It allows learners through the use of mobile devices (PDAs, tablets, Smartphones, etc.) to learn anytime and anywhere, in formal or informal places. As result, CL has become possible in mobile situations and real world environments. Hence, Mobile Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (MCSCL) represents a new paradigm of CL that is growing in use. This reality is confirmed by the big number of established MCSCL projects (Yatani et al., 2004; Zurita et al., 2005; Boticki et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2014). On the other hand, forming effective learning groups represents one of the important factors that determine the efficiency of CL. According to (Dillenbourg, 2002), studies show that three key conditions are required for any successful CL: the task features, the communication media, and the group composition. The importance of learning group formation (LGF) process is confirmed by many researchers in the literature (Huang & Wu, 2011; Webb et al., 1998). Nevertheless, the social, cultural, psychological, and cognitive diversities of learners make the operation of forming suitable learning groups a hard and time-consuming task. Although MCSCL represents a multidisciplinary research field (e.g., psychology, education, computer science), and although the importance of LGF process in succeeding the MCSCL activities, there is until date no effort to analyse the state of research on this topic. Thus, this paper reviews the studies addressing the topic of LGF in MCSCL using a systematic literature review (SLR) methodology. This SLR provides explicit information on what criteria are used for forming learning group, how to manually or automatically collect and use these criteria, how to support the dynamic formation of learning groups, what algorithms are used to form learning groups, and what methods are followed to evaluate the proposed approaches. The paper is organised in four main parts. The first one shows how forming groups in MCSCL is compared to that of traditional environments. The second part describes the research methodology used in this work. Then, the main findings and gaps from this SLR, together with recommendations for further research are presented. Finally, our conclusions are provided. Related research problem One of the important questions raised in this research is whether the LGF approaches addressing the traditional environments are effective for MCSCL. To answer this question, it is important to know if MCSCL can be considered as only an extension of CSCL supported by mobile devices. …

[1]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[2]  Brendan Tangney,et al.  Designing collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Leandro Navarro-Moldes,et al.  Group Prediction in Collaborative Learning , 2010, 2010 Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Environments.

[4]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? , 2002 .

[5]  P. Dillenbourg What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[6]  Alexander W. Chizhik,et al.  Equity Issues in Collaborative Group Assessment: Group Composition and Performance , 1998 .

[7]  Hiroaki Ogata,et al.  Social Knowledge Awareness Map for Computer Supported Ubiquitous Learning Environment , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[8]  Roland Hübscher Assigning Students to Groups Using General and Context-Specific Criteria , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[9]  Martin Muehlenbrock Formation of Learning Groups by using Learner Profiles and Context Information , 2005, AIED.

[10]  Hokyoung Ryu,et al.  A Framework for Assessing the Quality of Mobile Learning , 2006 .

[11]  Yueh-Min Huang,et al.  Social Learning Networks: Build Mobile Learning Networks Based on Collaborative Services , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[12]  Fusako Kusunoki,et al.  Musex: A system for supporting children's collaborative learning in a museum with PDAs , 2004 .

[13]  Hiroaki Ogata,et al.  Recommendation of Helpers Based on Personal Connections in Mobile Learning , 2012, 2012 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education.

[14]  Karin Lundgren-Cayrol,et al.  Apprentissage collaboratif à distance , 2001 .

[15]  David Lowe,et al.  Adaptive group formation to promote desired behaviours , 2012 .

[16]  Bert Bredeweg,et al.  Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology , 2005 .

[17]  Fusako Kusunoki,et al.  Musex: a system for supporting children's collaborative learning in a museum with PDAs , 2004, The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings..

[18]  Ivica Boticki,et al.  Supporting Mobile Collaborative Activities through Scaffolded Flexible Grouping , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[19]  Minjuan Wang,et al.  Community-organizing agent: An artificial intelligent system for building learning communities among large numbers of learners , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Yueh-Min Huang,et al.  A Systematic Approach for Learner Group Composition Utilizing U-Learning Portfolio , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[21]  Kinshuk,et al.  A Collaborative Mobile Virtual Campus System Based on Location-Based Dynamic Grouping , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[22]  Guilherme Horta Travassos,et al.  Cross versus Within-Company Cost Estimation Studies: A Systematic Review , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[23]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Social Interaction Mining Based on Wireless Sensor Networks for Promoting Cooperative Learning Performance in Classroom Learning Environment , 2010, 2010 6th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education.

[24]  Yueh-Min Huang,et al.  A Jigsaw-based Cooperative Learning Approach to Improve Learning Outcomes for Mobile Situated Learning , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[25]  Marcelo Milrad,et al.  Seventh IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education, WMUTE 2012, Takamatsu, Kagawa, Japan, March 27-30, 2012 , 2012, WMUTE.

[26]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering , 2006, ICSE.

[27]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Dynamic Grouping in Collaborative Learning Supported by Wireless Handhelds , 2005, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[28]  Yanjie Song,et al.  Mobile Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2013 .