Supraaortic arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T--highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view.

PURPOSE To prospectively use 3.0-T breath-hold high-spatial-resolution contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with highly accelerated parallel acquisition to image the supraaortic arteries of patients suspected of having arterial occlusive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Eighty patients (44 men, 36 women; age range, 44-90 years) underwent contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the head and neck at 3.0 T with an eight-channel neurovascular array coil. By applying a generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition algorithm with an acceleration factor of four, high-spatial-resolution (0.7 x 0.7 x 0.9 mm = 0.44-mm(3) voxels) three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography was performed during a 20-second breath hold. Two neuroradiologists evaluated vascular image quality and arterial stenoses. Interobserver variability was tested with the kappa coefficient. Quantitation of stenosis at MR angiography was compared with that at digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (n = 13) and computed tomographic (CT) angiography (n = 12) with Spearman rank correlation coefficient (R(s)). RESULTS Arterial stenoses were detected with contrast-enhanced MR angiography in 208 (reader 1) and 218 (reader 2) segments, with excellent interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.80). There was a significant correlation between contrast-enhanced MR angiography and CT angiography (R(s) = 0.95, reader 1; R(s) = 0.87, reader 2) and between contrast-enhanced MR angiography and DSA (R(s) = 0.94, reader 1; R(s) = 0.92, reader 2) for the degree of stenosis. Sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for detection of arterial stenoses greater than 50% were 94% and 98% for reader 1 and 100% and 98% for reader 2, with DSA as the standard of reference. Vascular image quality was sufficient for diagnosis or excellent for 97% of arterial segments evaluated. CONCLUSION By using highly accelerated parallel acquisition, the described 3.0-T contrast-enhanced MR angiographic protocol enabled visualization and characterization of the majority of supraaortic arteries, with diagnostic or excellent image quality (97% of arterial segments) and diagnostic values comparable with those obtained by using CT angiography and DSA for detection of arterial stenoses.

[1]  R. Vanninen,et al.  Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of carotid artery disease in symptomatic patients: comparison with rotational angiography and digital subtraction angiography. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  J Huston,et al.  Carotid artery tandem lesions: frequency of angiographic detection and consequences for endarterectomy. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Electrodynamics and ultimate SNR in parallel MR imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  J Huston,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla: initial clinical experience. , 2001, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[5]  S J Riederer,et al.  Theoretical limits of spatial resolution in elliptical‐centric contrast‐enhanced 3D‐MRA , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Renxin Chu,et al.  Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 51:22–26 (2004) Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Parallel Imaging Performance of a 16-Channel Receive-Only Brain Coil Array at , 2022 .

[7]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  James C Carr,et al.  High-resolution breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the entire carotid circulation. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Specific coil design for SENSE: A six‐element cardiac array , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  C Marsault,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[11]  Stephen J. Riederer,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Cervical Vessels: Experience With 422 Patients , 2001, Stroke.

[12]  Allan J. Fox,et al.  Significance of Plaque Ulceration in Symptomatic Patients With High‐Grade Carotid Stenosis , 1994, Stroke.

[13]  D. Dormont,et al.  Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. , 2003, Radiology.

[14]  C R Bird,et al.  Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  G. Hankey,et al.  Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease. , 1990, Stroke.

[16]  R. Edelman,et al.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography with simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics: A pilot study. , 2000, Radiology.

[17]  S. C. Johnston,et al.  Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA , 2004, Neurology.

[18]  J. Gauvrit,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the craniocervical vessels: a review , 1999, Neuroradiology.

[19]  James C Carr,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[20]  D. Sodickson,et al.  Ultimate intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio for parallel MRI: Electromagnetic field considerations , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  X Leclerc,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: the effect of voxel size on image quality. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[22]  H. Urbach,et al.  Noninvasive Detection of Steno-Occlusive Disease of the Supra-Aortic Arteries With Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: A Prospective, Intra-Individual Comparative Analysis With Digital Subtraction Angiography , 2005, Stroke.

[23]  Horst Urbach,et al.  Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. , 2002, Radiology.

[24]  V. Ladam-Marcus,et al.  Carotid arterial stenosis: evaluation at CT angiography with the volume-rendering technique. , 1999, Radiology.

[25]  J. R. Landis,et al.  An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. , 1977, Biometrics.

[26]  Horst Urbach,et al.  Time-of-flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging--initial experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[27]  S J Riederer,et al.  Carotid artery: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared with conventional angiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[28]  J. Brunberg,et al.  3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries. , 1996, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[29]  P. Nederkoorn,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. , 2003, Radiology.

[30]  T. Chenevert,et al.  Subclavian MR arteriography: reduction of susceptibility artifact with short echo time and dilute gadopentetate dimeglumine. , 2000, Radiology.

[31]  J Paul Finn,et al.  Time-Resolved Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Head and Neck at 3.0 Tesla: Initial Results , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[32]  Klaas P Pruessmann,et al.  Parallel Imaging at High Field Strength: Synergies and Joint Potential , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[33]  G. Schroth,et al.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.