Sensitivity of peptide conformational dynamics on clustering of a classical molecular dynamics trajectory.

We investigate the sensitivity of a Markov model with states and transition probabilities obtained from clustering a molecular dynamics trajectory. We have examined a 500 ns molecular dynamics trajectory of the peptide valine-proline-alanine-leucine in explicit water. The sensitivity is quantified by varying the boundaries of the clusters and investigating the resulting variation in transition probabilities and the average transition time between states. In this way, we represent the effect of clustering using different clustering algorithms. It is found that in terms of the investigated quantities, the peptide dynamics described by the Markov model is sensitive to the clustering; in particular, the average transition times are found to vary up to 46%. Moreover, inclusion of nonphysical sparsely populated clusters can lead to serious errors of up to 814%. In the investigation, the time step used in the transition matrix is determined by the minimum time scale on which the system behaves approximately Markovian. This time step is found to be about 100 ps. It is concluded that the description of peptide dynamics with transition matrices should be performed with care, and that using standard clustering algorithms to obtain states and transition probabilities may not always produce reliable results.

[1]  Xiongwu Wu,et al.  Enhancing systematic motion in molecular dynamics simulation , 1999 .

[2]  J. Mongan,et al.  Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[3]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Using path sampling to build better Markovian state models: predicting the folding rate and mechanism of a tryptophan zipper beta hairpin. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[4]  William Swope,et al.  Describing Protein Folding Kinetics by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. 1. Theory , 2004 .

[5]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[6]  William Swope,et al.  Describing Protein Folding Kinetics by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. 2. Example Applications to Alanine Dipeptide and a β-Hairpin Peptide† , 2004 .

[7]  Xiongwu Wu,et al.  Self-Guided Molecular Dynamics Simulation for Efficient Conformational Search , 1998 .

[8]  U. Hansmann Parallel tempering algorithm for conformational studies of biological molecules , 1997, physics/9710041.

[9]  Chris Oostenbrink,et al.  A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: The GROMOS force‐field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6 , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[10]  Gerrit Groenhof,et al.  GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[11]  V. Pande,et al.  Using massively parallel simulation and Markovian models to study protein folding: examining the dynamics of the villin headpiece. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[12]  K. Dill,et al.  A lattice statistical mechanics model of the conformational and sequence spaces of proteins , 1989 .

[13]  W. V. Gunsteren,et al.  Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field , 2005, European Biophysics Journal.

[14]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[15]  Stewart A. Adcock,et al.  Molecular Dynamics: Survey of Methods for Simulating the Activity of Proteins , 2006 .

[16]  B. Hess,et al.  Hydration thermodynamic properties of amino acid analogues: a systematic comparison of biomolecular force fields and water models. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[17]  S. F. Chekmarev,et al.  Potential energy surfaces and conformational transitions in biomolecules: a successive confinement approach applied to a solvated tetrapeptide. , 2002, Physical review letters.