Resource characteristics in social exchange networks: Implications for positional advantage

Despite the wide range of resources that traverse social networks, social exchange research has focused on only a narrow subset. Notably, prior social exchange research has not considered resources like information that have the capacity to diffuse through networks. The current study investigates how differences between the standard social exchange resource and an information-type resource affect the advantage provided by one's network position. Results of a laboratory experiment support predictions and offer two new insights to the foundations of positional advantage: (1) the location of advantageous positions in a network differs by resource characteristics, and (2) only in particular situations is a single position able to experience high levels of both power and exchange frequency.

[1]  P. Bonacich.  Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Kazuo Yamaguchi.  Power in networks of substitutable and complementary exchange relations : A rational-choice model and an analysis of power centralization , 1996 .

[3]  B. Wellman,et al.  Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Barry Markovsky,et al.  Responses to Social Exchange and Social Exclusion in Networks , 1997 .

[5]  P. Franses,et al.  Effectiveness of Brokering within Account Management Organizations , 2003 .

[6]  David Willer.  Network Exchange Theory , 1999 .

[7]  David Willer.  Power-at-a-Distance , 2003 .

[8]  M.A.L.M. van Assen.  EXCHANGE NETWORKS: AN ANALYSIS OF ALL NETWORKS UP TO SIZE 9 , 2003 .

[9]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[10]  K. Cook,et al.  Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks , 1978 .

[11]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Beyond answers: dimensions of the advice network , 2001, Soc. Networks.

[12]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Linda D. Molm,et al.  Power in Negotiated and Reciprocal Exchange , 1999, American Sociological Review.

[14]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[15]  David Willer,et al.  Power Relations in Exchange Networks , 1988 .

[16]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[17]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality , 2006, Soc. Networks.

[18]  Edward J. Lawler,et al.  Micro social orders , 2002 .

[19]  K. Cook,et al.  The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  David R. Schaefer,et al.  The Value of Reciprocity , 2007, Social Psychology Quarterly.

[21]  Noah E. Friedkin.  An expected value model of social power: predictions for selected exchange networks , 1992 .

[22]  John Skvoretz,et al.  The Seeds of Weak Power: an Extension of Network Exchange Theory , 1993 .

[23]  R. Hunt,et al.  The gatekeeper. , 1993, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[24]  Patricia E. Tweet.  Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2006 .

[25]  John Skvoretz,et al.  Negotiated Exchanges in Social Networks , 1995 .

[26]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Why knowledge does not equal power: the network redundancy trade-off , 2008 .

[27]  M. V. van Assen,et al.  Transferring Goods or Splitting a Resource Pool , 2008 .

[28]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Restricted Access in Networks and Models of Power , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  David Willer,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Journal of Mathematical Sociology Testing Ten Theories , 2022 .

[30]  F. Stokman.  What binds us when with whom? Content and structure in social network analysis , 2004 .

[31]  Comparison processes in social exchange networks , 2010 .

[32]  Edward J. Lawler,et al.  Commitment in Structurally Enabled and Induced Exchange Relations , 2006 .

[33]  U. Fischbacher.  z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[34]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[35]  Building Cohesion in Positively Connected Exchange Networks , 2009 .

[36]  K. Cook,et al.  Two Approaches to Social Structure: Exchange Theory and Network Analysis , 1992 .

[37]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Information and structural holes: comment on Reagans and Zuckerman , 2008 .

[38]  Urs Fischbacher,et al.  z-Tree - Zurich toolbox for readymade economic experiments: experimenter's manual , 1999 .

[39]  Beate Völker,et al.  Goal specific social capital and job satisfaction: Effects of different types of networks on instrumental and social aspects of work , 2001, Soc. Networks.

[40]  David R. Schaefer.  Votes, Favors, Toys, and Ideas: The Effect of Resource Characteristics on Power in Exchange Networks , 2007 .

[41]  Mark E. J. Newman.  A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[42]  David R. Schaefer,et al.  Resource Variation and the Development of Cohesion in Exchange Networks , 2009 .

[43]  Emmanuel Lazega,et al.  Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: a case study , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[44]  David R. Schaefer,et al.  Fragile and Resilient Trust: Risk and Uncertainty in Negotiated and Reciprocal Exchange* , 2009 .

[45]  Elisa Jayne Bienenstock,et al.  The core as a solution to exclusionary networks , 1992 .

[46]  Gary Alan Fine,et al.  Sociological Perspectives On Social Psychology , 2009 .

[47]  R. Burt.  A note on social capital and network content , 1997 .

[48]  Edward J. Lawler,et al.  Social Exchange and Micro Social Order , 2008 .

[49]  Karen S. Cook,et al.  Network Connections and the Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.