Bioprinting of Matrigel Scaffolds for Cancer Research

Cancer is one of the most life-threatening diseases worldwide. Despite the huge efforts, the failure rate of therapies remains high due to cells heterogeneity, so physiologically relevant models are strictly necessary. Bioprinting is a technology able to form highly complex 3D tissue models and enables the creation of large-scale constructs. In cancer research, Matrigel® is the most widely used matrix, but it is hardly bioprinted pure, without the use of any other bioink as reinforcement. Its complex rheological behavior makes the control with a standard bioprinting process nearly impossible. In this work, we present a customized bioprinting strategy to produce pure Matrigel® scaffolds with good shape fidelity. To this aim, we realized a custom-made volumetric dispensing system and performed printability evaluations. To determine optimal printing parameters, we analyzed fibers spreading ratio on simple serpentines. After identifying an optimal flow rate of 86.68 ± 5.77 µL/min and a printing speed of 10 mm/min, we moved forward to evaluate printing accuracy, structural integrity and other key parameters on single and multi-layer grids. Results demonstrated that Matrigel® was able to maintain its structure in both simple and complex designs, as well as in single and multilayer structures, even if it does not possess high mechanical strength. In conclusion, the use of volumetric dispensing allowed printing pure Matrigel® constructs with a certain degree of shape fidelity on both single and multiple layers.

[1]  Sakandar Rauf,et al.  3D bioprinting technology for regenerative medicine applications , 2016 .

[2]  D. Kelly,et al.  A comparison of different bioinks for 3D bioprinting of fibrocartilage and hyaline cartilage , 2016, Biofabrication.

[3]  Julio Aleman,et al.  Immersion Bioprinting of Tumor Organoids in Multi-Well Plates for Increasing Chemotherapy Screening Throughput , 2020, Micromachines.

[4]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[5]  D. Kelly,et al.  Tuning Alginate Bioink Stiffness and Composition for Controlled Growth Factor Delivery and to Spatially Direct MSC Fate within Bioprinted Tissues , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[6]  W. Murphy,et al.  Synthetic alternatives to Matrigel , 2020, Nature Reviews Materials.

[7]  Louis Scampavia,et al.  Advanced Development of Primary Pancreatic Organoid Tumor Models for High-Throughput Phenotypic Drug Screening , 2018, SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D.

[8]  J. Molenaar,et al.  Modeling polymer melt‐flow instabilities , 1994 .

[9]  Barry J Doyle,et al.  Mechanical behaviour of alginate-gelatin hydrogels for 3D bioprinting. , 2018, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[10]  J. Malda,et al.  Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting , 2020, Chemical reviews.

[11]  S. Hatzikiriakos,et al.  Role of slip and fracture in the oscillating flow of HDPE in a capillary , 1992 .

[12]  Anthony Atala,et al.  Optimization of gelatin–alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach , 2018, Biofabrication.

[13]  W. Sun,et al.  Bioprinting cell-laden matrigel for radioprotection study of liver by pro-drug conversion in a dual-tissue microfluidic chip , 2011, Biofabrication.

[14]  Jean J. Zhao,et al.  Bioprinting for cancer research. , 2015, Trends in biotechnology.

[15]  A. Bosserhoff,et al.  Tumor Cells Develop Defined Cellular Phenotypes After 3D-Bioprinting in Different Bioinks , 2019, Cells.

[16]  K. Burg,et al.  6.22 Adipose Tissue Engineering , 2017 .

[17]  T. O. Acarturk,et al.  Adipose Tissue Engineering , 2009 .

[18]  Wei Sun,et al.  Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells , 2016, Biofabrication.

[19]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Bioprinting the Cancer Microenvironment. , 2016, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.

[20]  N. McGranahan,et al.  Biological and therapeutic impact of intratumor heterogeneity in cancer evolution. , 2015, Cancer cell.

[21]  Michael Schwenk,et al.  Tumor , 1828, The London medical and physical journal.

[22]  Hyun-Wook Kang,et al.  Decellularized extracellular matrix-based bio-ink with enhanced 3D printability and mechanical properties , 2019, Biofabrication.

[23]  Douglass S. Kalika,et al.  Wall Slip and Extrudate Distortion in Linear Low‐Density Polyethylene , 1987 .

[24]  E. L. Moreno,et al.  Determination of the rheological properties of Matrigel for optimum seeding conditions in microfluidic cell cultures , 2018, AIP Advances.

[25]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[26]  Seeram Ramakrishna,et al.  Prospects for 3D bioprinting of organoids , 2021, Bio-Design and Manufacturing.

[27]  Jean Martínez,et al.  Chemical insights into bioinks for 3D printing. , 2019, Chemical Society reviews.