Stochastic analysis of retroactivity in transcriptional networks through singular perturbation

The input/output dynamic behavior of a biomolecular system is affected by interconnection to other downstream systems through impedance-like effects called retroactivity. In this paper, we study the effects of retroactivity at the interconnection between two transcriptional modules, focusing on stochastic behavior. In particular, we describe the system through the Master equation and develop a singular perturbation theory to obtain a reduced Master equation. We prove that the solution of the original Master equation converges fast to an e neighbor of the solution of the reduced Master equation, in which e is the singular perturbation parameter. Our analysis shows that the upstream system and the downstream one are statistically independent at the steady state. However, the interconnection slows down the dynamics of both the expectation and the variance of the output of the upstream transcriptional module.

[1]  Matthias Stiefenhofer.  Quasi-steady-state approximation for chemical reaction networks , 1998 .

[2]  R. Heinrich,et al.  Quasi-steady-state approximation in the mathematical modeling of biochemical reaction networks , 1983 .

[3]  D. Sherrington.  Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1983 .

[4]  K. Kim,et al.  Measuring retroactivity from noise in gene regulatory networks. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Andrew L. Rukhin,et al.  Continuous-Time Markov Chains and Applications: A Singular Perturbation Approach , 2001, Technometrics.

[6]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Signaling properties of a covalent modification cycle are altered by a downstream target , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  C. Rao,et al.  Stochastic chemical kinetics and the quasi-steady-state assumption: Application to the Gillespie algorithm , 2003 .

[8]  David K. Karig,et al.  Noise in biological circuits. , 2009, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[9]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  On the compromise between retroactivity attenuation and noise amplification in gene regulatory networks , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[10]  David F. Anderson,et al.  Product-Form Stationary Distributions for Deficiency Zero Chemical Reaction Networks , 2008, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[11]  P. Swain,et al.  Gene Regulation at the Single-Cell Level , 2005, Science.

[12]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Engineering principles in bio-molecular systems: From retroactivity to modularity , 2009, 2009 European Control Conference (ECC).

[13]  Brian Munsky,et al.  Reduction and solution of the chemical master equation using time scale separation and finite state projection. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[14]  Linda R Petzold,et al.  The slow-scale stochastic simulation algorithm. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[15]  Eric L Haseltine,et al.  Two classes of quasi-steady-state model reductions for stochastic kinetics. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[16]  Hassan K. Khalil,et al.  Singular perturbation methods in control : analysis and design , 1986 .

[17]  D. Gillespie.  Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[18]  U. Alon.  Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[19]  P. Olver.  Nonlinear Systems , 2013 .

[20]  Qing Zhang,et al.  Continuous-Time Markov Chains and Applications , 1998 .

[21]  C. J. Stone,et al.  Introduction to Stochastic Processes , 1972 .

[22]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation , 2008, Molecular systems biology.