Street use and design: daily rhythms on four streets that differ in rated walkability

ABSTRACT Few studies have correlated counts of street users to walkability features or tested for temporal variations in use across the day. Trained observers counted street users for four streets that differed in walkability according to the Irvine-Minnesota audit. From 7 am to 7 pm weekdays, across four 2-hour observation periods, all four streets had significant quadratic trends of increasing then decreasing use. Furthermore, the two most walkable streets also showed significant linear increases in users across the day. Part of a street’s identity is its temporal activity rhythm, and both walkability and rhythms can inform urban design and renewal.

[1]  J. Gagné.  Literature Review , 2018, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[2]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Analyzing walking route choice through built environments using random forests and discrete choice techniques , 2017, Environment and planning. B, urban analytics and city science.

[3]  Patricia Lopes Simoes Aelbrecht,et al.  'Fourth places': the contemporary public settings for informal social interaction among strangers , 2016 .

[4]  Robert Pless,et al.  Cameras and crowds in transportation tracking , 2015, Wireless Health.

[5]  Nancy A. Ross,et al.  Associations between neighbourhood walkability and daily steps in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[6]  Dick Ettema,et al.  Walking, places and wellbeing , 2015 .

[7]  W. Greene,et al.  Streetscape Features Related to Pedestrian Activity , 2016 .

[8]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Temporal aspects of homes: a transactional perspective , 2014 .

[9]  Jen Nickelson,et al.  Inventory of the physical environment domains and subdomains measured by neighborhood audit tools: A systematic literature review , 2013 .

[10]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Unpacking Walkability: Testing the Influence of Urban Design Features on Perceptions of Walking Environment Attractiveness , 2012 .

[11]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[12]  Rachel Weinberger,et al.  Integrating Walkability into Planning Practice , 2012 .

[13]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  A Direct Assessment of “Obesogenic” Built Environments: Challenges and Recommendations , 2011, Journal of environmental and public health.

[14]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  The Street Level Built Environment and Physical Activity and Walking , 2011 .

[15]  P. Ward,et al.  How much observation is enough? Refining the administration of SOPARC. , 2011, Journal of physical activity & health.

[16]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Walking routes to school in new urban and suburban neighborhoods: An environmental walkability analysis of blocks and routes , 2011 .

[17]  S. Volo,et al.  Urban rhythms and travel behaviour: Spatial and temporal phenomena of daily travel , 2011 .

[18]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Light rail use is more likely on “walkable” blocks: Further support for using micro-level environmental audit measures , 2010 .

[19]  Brady T West.  Analyzing Longitudinal Data With the Linear Mixed Models Procedure in SPSS , 2009, Evaluation & the health professions.

[20]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability , 2009 .

[21]  V. Mehta.  Look Closely and You Will See, Listen Carefully and You Will Hear: Urban Design and Social Interaction on Streets , 2009 .

[22]  M. Tremblay,et al.  A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review , 2008, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[23]  Vikas Mehta,et al.  Walkable streets: pedestrian behavior, perceptions and attitudes , 2008 .

[24]  B. Saelens,et al.  Built environment correlates of walking: a review. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Living Room: Rematerialising Home , 2008 .

[26]  R. Cervero,et al.  Influences of Built Environments on Walking and Cycling: Lessons from Bogotá , 2009 .

[27]  Katie M. Heinrich,et al.  Characteristics of Urban Sidewalks/Streets and Objectively Measured Physical Activity , 2008, Journal of Urban Health.

[28]  V. Mehta.  Lively Streets , 2007 .

[29]  Asha Weinstein Agrawal,et al.  How Far, by Which Route and Why? A Spatial Analysis of Pedestrian Preference , 2007 .

[30]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure built environments: reliability tests. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[31]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Identifying and Measuring Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability. , 2006, Journal of physical activity & health.

[32]  Daniela Golinelli,et al.  System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures. , 2006, Journal of physical activity & health.

[33]  Emily Stevens,et al.  A Method for Observing Physical Activity on Residential Sidewalks and Streets , 2006, Journal of Urban Health.

[34]  G. Schofield,et al.  Transport, urban design, and physical activity: an evidence-based update , 2005 .

[35]  L. Manzo,et al.  For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning , 2005 .

[36]  Mark C. Childs.  Squares: A Public Place Design Guide for Urbanists , 2004 .

[37]  G. Kyle,et al.  Linking place preferences with place meaning: An examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment , 2004 .

[38]  H. Staats,et al.  Alone or with a friend : A social context for psychological restoration and environmental preferences , 2004 .

[39]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[40]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[41]  Close Relationships in the Physical and Social World: Dialectical and Transactional Analyses , 1992 .

[42]  D. Linder,et al.  Public Places and Spaces. , 1990 .

[43]  Jean Stephans Kavanagh,et al.  PUBLIC STREETS FOR PUBLIC USE , 1989, Landscape Journal.

[44]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Transactional Qualities of Neighborhood Social Networks , 1986 .

[45]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Temporal Aspects of Homes , 1985 .

[46]  M. Goodchild,et al.  The City around the Clock: Space—Time Patterns of Urban Ecological Structure , 1984 .

[47]  W. Whyte.  The social life of small urban spaces , 1980 .

[48]  J. Freedman,et al.  Conceptions of Crowding. (Book Reviews: Crowding and Behavior; The Environment and Social Behavior. Privacy, Personal Space. Territory, Crowding) , 1975 .

[49]  J. Jacobs.  The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .