Switching of friction by binary polymer brushes.

Surface force studies on polystyrene-poly(2-vinylpyridine) (1 : 1) mixed polymer brushes and corresponding monobrushes were carried out in dried state under a controlled environment. The aim was to explore possibilities to control adhesion and friction between inorganic or polymeric surfaces by use of polymer brushes. The effect of switching of chemical composition of binary brush surfaces (on treatment with suitable solvents) on wettability, surface roughness, and hence the adhesion and friction properties of the surfaces were determined. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) with silicon tips, silicon nitride tips, and colloidal probes with silica particles were employed to investigate the interactions between inorganic surfaces and polymer brushes. To study the interactions between different polymer brush surfaces colloidal probes were covered with polystyrene and poly(acrylic acid) brushes on the surface. For all the dry polymer brushes samples, surface roughness values were in the range of 0.35-1.0 nm only. Adhesion and friction forces of polymer brush samples were reduced in comparison to the silicon wafer and were correlated with each other (except for the silicon tip). Switching in adhesion and friction forces up to a factor of 4.5 was possible by switching of the conformation of mixed brushes on treatment with selective solvents. The friction force on a PS + P2VP gradient polymer brush layer varied laterally and increased with increase in the P2VP content. Friction depends on wettability, scan velocity of the AFM tip, grafting density, and composition gradient of polymer brushes. Moreover, for PS and P2VP monobrushes, friction forces were shown to increase with increasing grafting density. Polymer brush layers thus may be used to control the adhesion and friction behavior of solid surfaces in different ways.

[1]  A. Drechsler,et al.  Force measurements between Teflon AF and colloidal silica particles in electrolyte solutions , 2004 .

[2]  Scott S Perry,et al.  Solvent dependent friction force response of polystyrene brushes prepared by surface initiated polymerization. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[3]  L. Ionov,et al.  Gradient Mixed Brushes: “Grafting To” Approach , 2004 .

[4]  E. Kumacheva,et al.  Interfacial sliding of polymer-bearing surfaces , 1994 .

[5]  G. Yakubov,et al.  Collective dynamics of an end-grafted polymer brush in solvents of varying quality. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[6]  Timothy P. Lodge,et al.  Tethered chains in polymer microstructures , 1992 .

[7]  Glenn H. Fredrickson,et al.  Lubrication forces between surfaces bearing polymer brushes , 1993 .

[8]  S. Patil,et al.  Bidisperse Mixed Brushes: Synthesis and Study of Segregation in Selective Solvent , 2003 .

[9]  Marcus Müller,et al.  Phase diagram of a mixed polymer brush. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Adhesion and stiction: Mechanisms, measurement techniques, and methods for reduction , 2003 .

[11]  Igor Luzinov,et al.  Adaptive and responsive surfaces through controlled reorganization of interfacial polymer layers , 2004 .

[12]  A. Takahara,et al.  Effect of aggregation state on nanotribological behaviors of organosilane monolayers. , 2002, Ultramicroscopy.

[13]  Yoshihiro Ito,et al.  pH-Sensitive Gating by Conformational Change of a Polypeptide Brush Grafted onto a Porous Polymer Membrane , 1997 .

[14]  P. Pincus,et al.  Colloid stabilization with grafted polyelectrolytes , 1991 .

[15]  W. Brittain,et al.  Synthesis, characterization, and properties of tethered polystyrene-b-polyacrylate brushes on flat silicate substrates , 2000 .

[16]  M. Müser,et al.  On the tribology and rheology of polymer brushes in good solvent conditions: a molecular dynamics study , 2003 .

[17]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Adhesion and Friction of Polymer Surfaces: The Effect of Chain Ends , 2005 .

[18]  V. Deline,et al.  Evidence for cleavage of polymer chains by crack propagation , 1989, Nature.

[19]  Kazuhiko Ishihara,et al.  Friction behavior of high-density poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) brush in aqueous media. , 2007, Soft matter.

[20]  G. Baker,et al.  Synthesis of Triblock Copolymer Brushes by Surface-Initiated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization , 2002 .

[21]  V. Tsukruk,et al.  Amphiphilic hairy disks with branched hydrophilic tails and a hexa-peri-hexabenzocoronene core. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  Dongyang Li,et al.  Experimental studies on relationships between the electron work function, adhesion, and friction for 3d transition metals , 2004 .

[23]  M. C. Lemieux,et al.  Ultrathin binary grafted polymer layers with switchable morphology. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[24]  Polymer Brushes with Liquid Crystalline Side Chains , 1999 .

[25]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Hydrophobicity, adhesion, and friction properties of nanopatterned polymers and scale dependence for micro- and nanoelectromechanical systems. , 2005, Nano letters.

[26]  K. Matyjaszewski,et al.  Reversible collapse of brushlike macromolecules in ethanol and water vapours as revealed by real-time scanning force microscopy. , 2004, Chemistry.

[27]  Weiwei Li,et al.  Electron work function: A parameter sensitive to the adhesion behavior of crystallographic surfaces , 2001 .

[28]  Marcus Müller,et al.  Two-level structured self-adaptive surfaces with reversibly tunable properties. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[29]  M. Stamm,et al.  Adhesion between chemically heterogeneous switchable polymeric brushes and an elastomeric adhesive. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[30]  J. Klein.  Shear, Friction, and Lubrication Forces Between Polymer-Bearing Surfaces , 1996 .

[31]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Micro/nanotribological characterization of PDMS and PMMA used for BioMEMS/NEMS applications , 2005 .

[32]  P. Braun,et al.  Patterned poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) brushes on silica surfaces by microcontact printing followed by surface-initiated polymerization. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[33]  T. Russell,et al.  Surface-Responsive Materials , 2002, Science.

[34]  Vladimir V. Tsukruk,et al.  Reorganization of Binary Polymer Brushes: Reversible Switching of Surface Microstructures and Nanomechanical Properties , 2003 .

[35]  V. Tsukruk,et al.  Y-shaped amphiphilic brushes with switchable micellar surface structures. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[36]  Frank Simon,et al.  Reversible tuning of wetting behavior of polymer surface with responsive polymer brushes , 2003 .

[37]  Marko,et al.  Phase separation in a grafted polymer layer. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[38]  D. Leckband,et al.  Interactions of Poly(ethylene oxide) Brushes with Chemically Selective Surfaces , 2000 .

[39]  Frank Simon,et al.  Synthesis of Adaptive Polymer Brushes via “Grafting To” Approach from Melt , 2002 .

[40]  Uri Raviv,et al.  Lubrication by charged polymers , 2003, Nature.

[41]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Atomic-Scale Friction Measurements Using Friction Force Microscopy. Part 1. General Principles and New Measurement Techniques , 1994 .

[42]  G. Grest.  Normal and Shear Forces Between Polymer Brushes , 1999 .

[43]  M. Müller,et al.  Lateral versus perpendicular segregation in mixed polymer brushes. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[44]  J. Krim,et al.  Resource Letter: FMMLS-1: Friction at macroscopic and microscopic length scales , 2002 .

[45]  Igor Luzinov,et al.  Mixed polymer brushes by sequential polymer addition: anchoring layer effect. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[46]  Eugene R. Zubarev,et al.  Microtribological and Nanomechanical Properties of Switchable Y‐Shaped Amphiphilic Polymer Brushes , 2005 .

[47]  V. Senkovskyy,et al.  Controlling Tack with Bicomponent Polymer Brushes , 2006 .