Speech perception was tested through a broad-band syllabic compressor with four different static input-output configurations. All other parameters of the compressor were held constant. The compressor was implemented digitally and incorporated a delay to reduce overshoot. We studied four different input-output configurations, including a linear reference condition. Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects participated in the experiments testing perception of meaningful sentences as well as nonsense CVCs in carrier phrases. The speech materials were presented in quiet and in noise. The results from the CVCs were analyzed quantitatively in terms of scores and qualitatively in terms of phoneme confusions. Differences in speech perception due to the different input-output configurations were small. The input-output configuration with the highest amplification of low amplitude sounds yielded the best results. Detailed analysis of the results included a correlational analysis with a number of auditory functions characterizing the ears tested. The pure-tone audiogram provided parameters of auditory sensitivity: average audiometric loss and audiometric slope. Psychophysical tests provided parameters of temporal resolution and frequency selectivity: the temporal resolution factor, temporal gap detection, and auditory filter shape. The correlational analysis showed that the subjects with better temporal acuity obtained better results.
[1]
R. Patterson,et al.
Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry.
,
1980,
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2]
A. M. Mimpen,et al.
Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences.
,
1979,
Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[3]
J. Chang,et al.
Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition
,
1970
.
[4]
Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.
Theory and Methods of Scaling.
,
1958
.
[5]
W. Dreschler,et al.
The Effect of Hearing Impairment on Auditory Filter Shapes in Simultaneous and Forward Masking
,
1986
.
[6]
Mary Florentine,et al.
Gap Detection in Normal and Impaired Listeners: The Effect of Level and Frequency
,
1985
.
[7]
H. Levitt.
Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.
,
1971,
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8]
K Schorn,et al.
Temporal resolution in hard-of-hearing patients.
,
1982,
Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.