Human-centred Design Workshops in Collaborative Strategic Design Projects: An educational and professional comparison

It has been found that the implementation of Human-centred Design (HCD) methods in the Fuzzy Front-End is not likely to lead to diversification in educational product planning exercises, where time lines are short and executors lack experience. Companies, interested to collaborate with Master-level Industrial Design students on strategic design projects, should have realistic ambitions with respect to innovation and value creation. Moreover, diversification is not the only generic growth strategy to gain competitive advantage. Value can also be created from developing new products for existing markets, or creating new markets for existing products. On the contrary, companies who aim for diversification in their generic growth strategies, may not always end up with a complementary ‘high valued’ design outcome. From a learning perspective, the understanding of HCD methods created awareness among students and companies that respect and empathy for the end-user are important for enriching their design processes, and as such increasing the chances for diversification in subsequent projects with clients. This study also compares the implementation of Human-Centred Design (HCD) methods in a professional /collaborative and an educational/collaborative strategic design project.

[1]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  50th Anniversary Article: Technological Innovation, Product Development, and Entrepreneurship in Management Science , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[2]  H. Ansoff Corporate strategy : an analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion , 1965 .

[3]  Suzan Boztepe,et al.  User Value: Competing Theories and Models , 2007 .

[4]  A. Kleinknecht,et al.  Success and Failure of Innovation: A Literature Review , 2003 .

[5]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  The PDMA toolbook for new product development , 2002 .

[6]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  THE INVISIBLE SUCCESS FACTORS IN PRODUCT INNOVATION , 1999 .

[7]  Brigitte Borja de Mozota,et al.  The Impact of User‐Oriented Design on New Product Development: An Examination of Fundamental Relationships* , 2005 .

[8]  Bernard Cova,et al.  Societal innovations and the postmodern aestheticization of everyday life , 1993 .

[9]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[10]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[11]  J. Dewey Experience and Education , 1938 .

[12]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Creating Breakthrough Products: Innovation from Product Planning to Program Approval , 2001 .

[13]  R. Mauborgne,et al.  Blue Ocean Strategy: From Theory to Practice , 2005 .

[14]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Co-creation and the new landscapes of design , 2008 .

[15]  Roger Sametz,et al.  Storytelling through design , 2010 .

[16]  Sari Kujala,et al.  User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[17]  R. B. Woodruff,et al.  The influence of culture upon consumers’ desired value perceptions: A research agenda , 2005 .

[18]  M.G.D. Steen,et al.  Benefits of co-design in service design projects , 2011 .

[19]  Greg Bamford,et al.  From analysis/synthesis to conjecture/analysis: a review of Karl Popper's influence on design methodology in architecture , 2002 .

[20]  James A. Christiansen,et al.  Building the Innovative Organization , 2000 .

[21]  Sam Bucolo,et al.  Design-led innovation - Exploring the synthesis of needs, technologies and business models , 2011 .

[22]  Liz Sanders,et al.  ON MODELINGAn evolving map of design practice and design research , 2008, INTR.

[23]  Sharon Poggenpohl,et al.  User-Centered Innovation: The Interplay between User-Research and Design Innovation , 2002 .

[24]  Karel Vredenburg,et al.  User-Centered Design: An Integrated Approach , 2001 .

[25]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd Edition , 2002 .