The Effect of Visual Feedback on Learnability and Usability of Design Methods

Currently 2D displays are used for the majority of design tasks, but 3D successors are slowly being introduced as a promising alternative. Understanding how the dimensionality of displayed images influences the effectiveness and efficiency of designers working with virtual reality design environments is therefore of great interest. This paper presents the results of a comparative usability study, which focuses on assessing the influence of different types of displays on learnability and usability. In our study, we carried out an experiment to compare 2D screen and 3D displays. Users were asked to design free form shapes in each of the three types of environments using a prescribed human-computer interaction process. This research shows that there are significant differences between the preferences of different user groups. Gender and level of expertise in using advanced visualization technologies had a significant influence on the usability and learnability of the design methods for each of the three display types.

[1]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  An initial examination of ease of use for 2D and 3D information visualizations of web content , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[3]  Neff Walker,et al.  Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[4]  Albert N. Badre,et al.  Discount Learnability Evaluation , 1995 .

[5]  Melanie Tory,et al.  Visualization task performance with 2D, 3D, and combination displays , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  Paul Roe,et al.  Collaborative learning: towards a solution for novice programmers , 2008, ACE '08.

[7]  Attila Barsi,et al.  THE HOLOVIZIO SYSTEM - NEW OPPORTUNITY OFFERED BY 3D DISPLAYS , 2008 .

[8]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Usability Evaluation , 2001 .

[9]  Hannes Kaufmann,et al.  Summary of Usability Evaluations of an Educational Augmented Reality Application , 2007, HCI.

[10]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  SCWID: A Tool for Supporting Creative Work In Design , 2005 .

[11]  Thomas R. Herzog Research Methods and Data Analysis in the Social Sciences , 1997 .

[12]  Imre Horváth,et al.  Qualitative Analysis of the Affordances of Three-Dimensional Imaging Systems With a View to Conceptual Shape Design , 2007 .

[13]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  User acceptance of information technology , 2001 .

[14]  Tom Stewart,et al.  Usability evaluation , 2009, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[15]  Cullen D. Jackson,et al.  CAVE and fishtank virtual-reality displays: a qualitative and quantitative comparison , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[16]  Ian Gibson,et al.  Desktop virtual reality interface for computer aided conceptual design using geometric techniques , 2001 .

[17]  Paulo Dias,et al.  Usability Evaluation in Virtual Reality: A User Study Comparing Three Different Setups , 2008, EGVE.