Effect of target and probe concentrations on hybridization in DNA microarrays

Efficient hybridization of complementary strands of DNA is the underlying principle of all microarray-based techniques for gene expression analysis. Recently studies have been published to assess oligonucleotide (55-70 bases) performance on glass-slide microarrays and stress advantages over the cDNA arrays. Importantly the oligo arrays eliminate possible failure in PCR amplifications and attain sequence optimization. In the present study, we have used 60mer oligo microarrays to investigate the effect of target (immobilized on the glass slides) and probe concentrations and possible probe interactions on hybridization. Scanner calibration slides (manufactured by Full Moon BioSystems) were used to concert the fluorescence signals into fluorophore per μm2 in order to eliminate possible variation from scanner. The retention of the target was determined based on mock hybridization using Cy3-labeled oligonucleotide. We found that hybridization signals fell within the linear response range when the target concentration (printing solution) was equal or less than 2.5 μM. With fixed target concentrations, there is a non-linear relationship between the probe concentration and the hybridization signal. Dual-probe hybridization measurements suggest that hybridization of probes is not ideally independent. In this study, hybridization signal from Cy5 is consistently lower than that from Cy3.

[1]  D. Kemp,et al.  Method for detection of specific RNAs in agarose gels by transfer to diazobenzyloxymethyl-paper and hybridization with DNA probes. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Jiang Li,et al.  Differential gene expression patterns revealed by oligonucleotide versus long cDNA arrays. , 2002, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[3]  Katarina Lindroos,et al.  Minisequencing on oligonucleotide microarrays: comparison of immobilisation chemistries , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  S. P. Fodor,et al.  Large-scale genotyping of complex DNA , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  S Hamels,et al.  Comparison between different strategies of covalent attachment of DNA to glass surfaces to build DNA microarrays. , 2000, Analytical biochemistry.

[6]  Jiasen Lu,et al.  Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of oligonucleotide (50mer) microarrays. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  C. Consolandi,et al.  Analysis of DNA microarrays by non-destructive fluorescent staining using SYBR green II. , 2000, BioTechniques.

[8]  E. Southern Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. 1975. , 1992, Biotechnology.

[9]  M. Hessner,et al.  Three color cDNA microarrays: quantitative assessment through the use of fluorescein-labeled probes. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  John Quackenbush,et al.  Assessing unmodified 70-mer oligonucleotide probe performance on glass-slide microarrays , 2003, Genome Biology.

[11]  S. P. Fodor,et al.  Light-directed, spatially addressable parallel chemical synthesis. , 1991, Science.