Performance of AC and DC based transmission switching heuristics on a large-scale polish system

Optimal transmission switching (OTS) has demonstrated benefits both in terms of reliability and cost savings for bulk power systems. OTS is a mixed-integer program (MIP) with binary variables representing the status of the transmission elements. Due to the computational complexity of this MIP, implementation of OTS is limited. Therefore, different heuristics have been proposed to find good, suboptimal solutions fast. The heuristics are often tested on small test cases with restricted analysis on actual systems. This work tests two of the recently developed fast heuristics on the Polish system to show their performance. The results suggest that the best solutions are among the top twenty candidates identified by the heuristics if they are based on the ACOPF solution. If the heuristics are calculated based on the DCOPF solution, the performance may be poor. The correlation between estimated benefits and actual benefits is not very promising in either of the cases.

[1]  R. Baldick,et al.  Dispatchable transmission in RTO markets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  A. Cha,et al.  Fast Heuristics for Transmission-Line Switching , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Kory W. Hedman,et al.  Robust Corrective Topology Control for System Reliability , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  M. Ferris,et al.  Optimal Transmission Switching , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Michael Ferris,et al.  Co-optimization of generation unit commitment and transmission switching with N-1 reliability , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[7]  Kory W. Hedman,et al.  Analyzing the impacts of out-of-market corrections , 2013, 2013 IREP Symposium Bulk Power System Dynamics and Control - IX Optimization, Security and Control of the Emerging Power Grid.

[8]  R. Baldick,et al.  Border Flow Rights and Contracts for Differences of Differences: Models for Electric Transmission Property Rights , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  S. Oren,et al.  Optimal Transmission Switching—Sensitivity Analysis and Extensions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Milad Soroush,et al.  Accuracies of Optimal Transmission Switching Heuristics Based on DCOPF and ACOPF , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  M. Caramanis,et al.  Tractable Transmission Topology Control Using Sensitivity Analysis , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  S. Oren,et al.  Smart Flexible Just-in-Time Transmission and Flowgate Bidding , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Robert J. Thomas,et al.  MATPOWER's extensible optimal power flow architecture , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[14]  R.P. O'Neill,et al.  Optimal Transmission Switching With Contingency Analysis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Anthony Papavasiliou,et al.  An application of high performance computing to transmission switching , 2013, 2013 IREP Symposium Bulk Power System Dynamics and Control - IX Optimization, Security and Control of the Emerging Power Grid.