Sensitivity analysis and automation for intraoperative implementation of the atlas-based method for brain shift correction

The use of biomechanical models to correct the misregistration due to deformation in image guided neurosurgical systems has been a growing area of investigation. In previous work, an atlas-based inverse model was developed to account for soft-tissue deformations during image-guided surgery. Central to that methodology is a considerable amount of pre-computation and planning. The goal of this work is to evaluate techniques that could potentially reduce that burden. Distinct from previous manual techniques, an automated segmentation technique is described for the cerebrum and dural septa. The shift correction results using this automated segmentation method were compared to those using the manual methods. In addition, the extent and distribution of the surgical parameters associated with the deformation atlas were investigated by a sensitivity analysis using simulation experiments and clinical data. The shift correction results did not change significantly using the automated method (correction of 73±13% ) as compared to the semi-automated method from previous work (correction of 76±13%). The results of the sensitivity analysis show that the atlas could be constructed by coarser sampling (six fold reduction) without substantial degradation in the shift reconstruction, a decrease in preoperative computational time from 13.1±3.5 hours to 2.2±0.6 hours. The automated segmentation technique and the findings of the sensitivity study have significant impact on the reduction of pre-operative computational time, improving the utility of the atlas-based method. The work in this paper suggests that the atlas-based technique can become a ‘time of surgery’ setup procedure rather than a pre-operative computing strategy.

[1]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Robust nonrigid registration to capture brain shift from intraoperative MRI , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  M. Biot General Theory of Three‐Dimensional Consolidation , 1941 .

[3]  C. Nimsky,et al.  Quantification of, Visualization of, and Compensation for Brain Shift Using Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[4]  L. Lunsford A Mobile Computed Tomographic Scanner with Intraoperative and Intensive Care Unit Applications , 1998 .

[5]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Registration of 3-d intraoperative MR images of the brain using a finite-element biomechanical model , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  An atlas-based method to compensate for brain shift: Preliminary results , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  A Fast and Efficient Method to Compensate for Brain Shift for Tumor Resection Therapies Measured Between Preoperative and Postoperative Tomograms , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Cortical Surface Tracking Using a Stereoscopic Operating Microscope , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[9]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  Ultrasound/MRI Overlay with Image Warping for Neurosurgery , 2000, MICCAI.

[10]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Karol Miller,et al.  Patient-specific model of brain deformation: application to medical image registration. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  The adaptive bases algorithm for intensity-based nonrigid image registration , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  A. Hartov,et al.  Model-updated image guidance: initial clinical experiences with gravity-induced brain deformation , 2002, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[14]  Hesham El-Rewini,et al.  Message Passing Interface (MPI) , 2005 .

[15]  MICHAEL I. MIGA,et al.  In Vivo Analysis of Heterogeneous Brain Deformation Computations for Model-Updated Image Guidance , 2000, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[16]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Brain shift estimation in image-guided neurosurgery using 3-D ultrasound , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  J. Patrick Intraoperative Brain Shift and Deformation: A Quantitative Analysis of Cortical Displacement in 28 Cases , 1998 .

[18]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  An integrated range-sensing, segmentation and registration framework for the characterization of intra-surgical brain deformations in image-guided surgery , 2003, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[19]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  Ultrasound Probe Tracking for Real-Time Ultrasound/MRI Overlay and Visualization of Brain Shift , 1999, MICCAI.

[20]  Takeyoshi Dohi,et al.  Multimodality Deformable Registration of Pre- and Intraoperative Images for MRI-guided Brain Surgery , 1998, MICCAI.

[21]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  A three-dimensional mesh generator for arbitrary multiple material domains , 1997 .

[22]  Hans Petter Langtangen,et al.  Modern Software Tools for Scientific Computing , 1997, Birkhäuser Boston.

[23]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Intraoperative Brain Shift Compensation: Accounting for Dural Septa , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Valerie Duay,et al.  A method to track cortical surface deformations using a laser range scanner , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Hesham El-Rewini,et al.  Advanced Computer Architecture and Parallel Processing , 2005 .

[26]  Valerie Duay,et al.  Atlas-Based Segmentation of the Brain for 3-Dimensional Treatment Planning in Children with Infratentorial Ependymoma , 2003, MICCAI.