Understanding User's Sustained Participation in Social Research Network sites

Recently, a new form of social network site focusing on researchers has emerged and attracted worldwide users. In addition to basic functionalities of SNSs, social research network sites (SRNS) combine multiple research-specific tools, such as knowledge management tools, citation management, and paper recommendation engines, supporting researchers to collaboratively structure, coordinate and conduct their work online. However, scholars are not interested in social networking as an end in itself, they networks to enhance productivity. The turnover rate of users remains a great challenge for the viability of SRNS. Therefore, exploring the determinants that impact members’ continued participation behavior in SRNS is critical to both scholars and practitioners. From the perspective of group commitment, we attempt to address the following two questions. First, what factors would cultivate different forms of commitment of members to a virtual group. Second, how would these different forms of commitment impact members’ continuance intention in SRNS. Based on the target-behavior commitment model, we proposed the preliminary model for understanding continued knowledge sharing (from contributing and seeking perspectives) in SRNS. The expected contribution of this study is discussed.

[1]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  Multitrait-Multimethod Validation of the Satisfaction with My Supervisor Scale , 1992 .

[2]  H. Becker Notes on the Concept of Commitment , 1960, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  R. Roe,et al.  Beyond the three-component model of organizational commitment. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  John P. Meyer,et al.  A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment , 1991 .

[5]  B. Gu,et al.  Competition among Virtual Communities and User Valuation : The Case of Investor Communities 1 , 2005 .

[6]  Edward Shih-Tse Wang,et al.  Forming relationship commitments to online communities: The role of social motivations , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Nick Oliver,et al.  Rewards, investments, alternatives and organizational commitment: Empirical evidence and theoretical development , 1990 .

[8]  Xi Zhang,et al.  Attracted to or Locked In? Predicting Continuance Intention in Social Virtual World Services , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Thomas E. Becker Foci and Bases of Commitment: Are They Distinctions Worth Making? , 1992 .

[10]  Constance Elise Porter,et al.  A Typology of Virtual Communities: A Multi-Disciplinary Foundation for Future Research , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[11]  Elena Giglia,et al.  Academic social networks: it’s time to change the way we do research , 2011 .

[12]  A. Bullinger,et al.  IT-based Interactive Research – on the Use of Social Software in Research , 2011 .

[13]  Brown,et al.  Organizational Commitment: Clarifying the Concept and Simplifying the Existing Construct Typology , 1996, Journal of vocational behavior.

[14]  Yuhyung Shin,et al.  A Person-Environment Fit Model for Virtual Organizations , 2004 .

[15]  M. Konovsky,et al.  Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  Terry Daugherty,et al.  Organizational Virtual Communities: Exploring Motivations Behind Online Panel Participation , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Shiu-Wan Hung,et al.  Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Xiaoqing Wang,et al.  An ecological perspective on online communities , 2007 .

[19]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[20]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Research Note - The Impact of Community Commitment on Participation in Online Communities , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  J. Bishop,et al.  Support, Commitment, and Employee Outcomes in a Team Environment , 2000 .

[22]  Glenn J. Browne,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Web Site Use Using a Commitment-Based Model , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[23]  Bin Gu,et al.  Competition Among Virtual Communities and User Valuation: The Case of Investing-Related Communities , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  The Role of Trust and Commitment in Continuous Knowledge Contribution Intention within Business Online Communities , 2012, CONF-IRM.

[26]  Kathrin M. Möslein,et al.  Towards Research Collaboration - a Taxonomy of Social Research Network Sites , 2010, AMCIS.

[27]  J. Bishop,et al.  An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Y. Wiener Commitment in Organizations: A Normative View , 1982 .

[29]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  John P. Meyer,et al.  AFFECTIVE, CONTINUANCE, AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT TO THE ORGANIZATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF ANTECEDENTS, CORRELATES, AND CONSEQUENCES , 2002 .

[31]  Sung S. Kim,et al.  Out of Dedication or Constraint? A Dual Model of Post-Adoption Phenomena and its Empirical Test in the Context of Online Services , 2009, MIS Q..

[32]  Harsha Gangadharbatla Individual Differences in Social Networking Site Adoption , 2009 .

[33]  Pratim Datta,et al.  A Technology Commitment Model of Post-Adoption Behavior , 2009, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[34]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. , 1993 .

[35]  Clinton O. Longenecker,et al.  The behavioral expression of organizational commitment , 1990 .