A comparison of multilevel methods for total variation regularization.

We consider numerical methods for solving problems involving total variation (TV) regularization for semidefinite quadratic minimization problems minu ‖Ku−z‖2 arising from illposed inverse problems. HereK is a compact linear operator, and z is data containing inexact or partial information about the “true” u. TV regularization entails adding to the objective function a penalty term which is a scalar multiple of the total variation of u; this term formally appears as (a scalar times) the L1 norm of the gradient of u. The advantage of this regularization is that it improves the conditioning of the optimization problem while not penalizing discontinuities in the reconstructed image. This approach has enjoyed significant success in image denoising and deblurring, laser interferometry, electrical tomography, and estimation of permeabilities in porus media flow models. The Euler equation for the regularized objective functional is a quasilinear elliptic equation of the form [ K∗K+ A(u) ] u = −K∗z. Here, A(u) is a standard self-adjoint second order elliptic operator in which the coefficient κ depends on u, by [κ(u)](x) = 1/|∇u(x)|. Following the literature, we approach the Euler equation by means of fixed point iterations, resulting in a sequence of linear subproblems. In this paper we present results from numerical experiments in which we use the preconditioned conjugate gradient method on the linear subproblems, with various multilevel iterative methods used as preconditioners.

[1]  Curtis R. Vogel,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Image Processing Fast, Robust Total Variation{based Reconstruction of Noisy, Blurred Images , 2022 .

[2]  J. Nagy,et al.  Restoration of atmospherically blurred images by symmetric indefinite conjugate gradient techniques , 1996 .

[3]  E. Giusti Minimal surfaces and functions of bounded variation , 1977 .

[4]  D. Dobson,et al.  An image-enhancement technique for electrical impedance tomography , 1994 .

[5]  Panayot S. Vassilevski,et al.  Stabilizing the Hierarchical Basis by Approximate Wavelets, I: Theory , 1997, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl..

[6]  Panayot S. Vassilevski,et al.  Wavelet-Like Methods in the Design of Efficient Multilevel Preconditioners for Elliptic PDEs , 1997 .

[7]  Peter Oswald,et al.  Multilevel Finite Element Approximation , 1994 .

[8]  William W. Hager,et al.  Updating the Inverse of a Matrix , 1989, SIAM Rev..

[9]  Curtis R. Vogel Sparse Matrix Computations Arising in Distributed Parameter Identification , 1999, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[10]  Curtis R. Vogel,et al.  Iterative Methods for Total Variation Denoising , 1996, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[11]  M. Oman Fast Multigrid Techniques in Total Variation-Based Image Reconstruction , 1996 .

[12]  H. Yserentant On the multi-level splitting of finite element spaces , 1986 .

[13]  Fadil Santosa,et al.  Recovery of Blocky Images from Noisy and Blurred Data , 1996, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[14]  Panayot S. Vassilevski,et al.  On Two Ways of Stabilizing the Hierarchical Basis Multilevel Methods , 1997, SIAM Rev..

[15]  D. Dobson,et al.  Convergence of an Iterative Method for Total Variation Denoising , 1997 .

[16]  Panayot S. Vassilevski,et al.  Stabilizing the Hierarchical Basis by Approximate Wavelets II: Implementation and Numerical Results , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[17]  Panayot S. Vassilevski,et al.  Stabilizing the Hierarchical Basis by Approximate Wavelets, I: Theory , 1997 .

[18]  C. Vogel,et al.  Analysis of bounded variation penalty methods for ill-posed problems , 1994 .

[19]  L. R. Bragg,et al.  Pitman research notes in mathematics series, 0269-3674; 154 on Oakland conference on partial differential equations and applied mathematics , 1986 .

[20]  Raymond H. Chan,et al.  Continuation method for total variation denoising problems , 1995, Optics & Photonics.

[21]  ProblemsTony,et al.  Continuation Method for Total Variation Denoising , 1995 .