Importance of trophic information, simplification and aggregation error in ecosystem models

Ecosystem models are becoming increasingly important as pressure from fisheries intensifies and ecosystem-based fisheries management becomes more widely used. Trophic webs often form the basis of ecosystem models and ecosystem-specific dietary information is crucial for optimal model performance. This is particularly the case if model predictions are used in management decisions. The Tasmanian live fish fishery for banded morwong was used as a case study to investigate the importance of trophic information, model simplification and aggregation error on ecosystem model results. Dietary analysis of 6 commonly captured reef fish was undertaken. Significant trophic overlap was found between blue throat wrasse Notolabrus tetricus and purple wrasse N. fucicola, and banded morwong Cheilodactylus spectabilis and bastard trumpeter Latridopsis forsteri. Marblefish Aplodactylus arctidens and long-snouted boarfish Pentaceropsis recurvirostris had significantly different diets from other species studied. Using this information, a detailed qualitative model was produced and then simplified through the aggregation of variables. Variables were aggregated using 3 methods: Euclidean distance, Bray-Curtis similarity, and regular equivalence for inclusion in 3 simplified models. Variable aggregation is undertaken in many studies and may create aggregation error. Each aggregation method produced a different proportion of incorrect model predictions as a result of aggregation error. The model simplified using regular equivalence produced the least aggregation error and a web structure aligned with the dietary analysis. More widespread use of these methods in fisheries management should be considered.

[1]  F. P. Ojeda,et al.  Guild structure of carnivorous intertidal fishes of the Chilean coast: implications of ontogenetic dietary shifts , 1998, Oecologia.

[2]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Communities , 1976, Nature.

[3]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Defining and measuring trophic role similarity in food webs using regular equivalence. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  G. E. Fenton Population dynamics of Tenagomysis tasmaniae Fenton, Anisomysis mixta australis (Zimmer) and Paramesopodopsis rufa Fenton from south-eastern Tasmania (Crustacea:Mysidacea) , 1996, Hydrobiologia.

[5]  M. Keough,et al.  AN INTRODUCED POLYCHAETE AFFECTS RECRUITMENT AND LARVAL ABUNDANCE OF SESSILE INVERTEBRATES , 2002 .

[6]  K. Clements,et al.  Diet in odacid and aplodactylid fishes from Australia and New Zealand , 1992 .

[7]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Aggregation error in ecological models , 1979 .

[8]  G. E. Fenton Diet and predators of Tenagomysis tasmaniae Fenton, Anisomysis mixta australis (Zimmer) and Paramesopodopsis rufa Fenton from south-eastern Tasmania (Crustacea:Mysidacea) , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[9]  Pierre Auger,et al.  Aggregation and emergence in ecological modelling: integration of ecological levels , 2000 .

[10]  D. Baird,et al.  Determining the trophic guilds of fishes and macroinvertebrates in a seagrass food web , 2002 .

[11]  H. S. Horn,et al.  Measurement of "Overlap" in Comparative Ecological Studies , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Karline Soetaert,et al.  Model complexity and performance: How far can we simplify? , 2006 .

[13]  Mark A. Hindell,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation in the diet of a high trophic level predator, the Australian fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) , 2004 .

[14]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Aggregation error in nonlinear ecological models , 1983 .

[15]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Robust Analysis of Aggregation Error , 1982 .

[16]  Stuart Banks,et al.  A trophic model of a Galápagos subtidal rocky reef for evaluating fisheries and conservation strategies , 2004 .

[17]  Charles J. Puccia,et al.  Qualitative Modeling of Complex Systems: An Introduction to Loop Analysis and Time Averaging , 1986 .

[18]  Villy Christensen,et al.  ECOPATH II − a software for balancing steady-state ecosystem models and calculating network characteristics , 1992 .

[19]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Must top predators be culled for the sake of fisheries? , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  R. Sokal,et al.  Principles of numerical taxonomy , 1965 .

[21]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Aggregation in model ecosystems. I. Perfect aggregation , 1987 .

[22]  D. Raffaelli,et al.  Compartments and predation in an estuarine food web , 1992 .

[23]  R Levins,et al.  DISCUSSION PAPER: THE QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PARTIALLY SPECIFIED SYSTEMS , 1974, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  C. Woods Natural diet of the crab Notomithrax ursus (Brachyura: Majidae) at Oaro, South Island, New Zealand , 1993 .

[25]  J. Ramsey,et al.  Reliability in Measuring Diet Overlap , 1983 .

[26]  Debal Deb Trophic uncertainty vs parsimony in food web research , 1997 .

[27]  J. Petersen,et al.  Clearance capacity of Electra bellula (Bryozoa) in seagrass meadows of Western Australia , 2000 .

[28]  E. Fulton,et al.  Effect of complexity on marine ecosystem models , 2003 .

[29]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin , 1957 .

[30]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  Aggregation in Model Ecosystems II. Approximate Aggregation , 1989 .

[31]  Alan Williams,et al.  Diets and trophic guilds of demersal fishes of the south-eastern Australian shelf , 2001 .

[32]  E. Cortés A critical review of methods of studying fish feeding based on analysis of stomach contents: application to elasmobranch fishes , 1997 .

[33]  Jeffrey M. Dambacher,et al.  RELEVANCE OF COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN ASSESSING INDETERMINACY OF ECOLOGICAL PREDICTIONS , 2002 .

[34]  Julia L. Blanchard,et al.  Aggregation and removal of weak-links in food-web models: system stability and recovery from disturbance , 2005 .

[35]  J.,et al.  Stomach contents analysis-a review of methods and their application , 2022 .

[36]  Johanna J. Heymans,et al.  Hundred‐year decline of North Atlantic predatory fishes , 2003 .

[37]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  INTERPOLATING, EXTRAPOLATING, AND COMPARING INCIDENCE-BASED SPECIES ACCUMULATION CURVES , 2004 .