The effects of visual crowding, text size, and positional uncertainty on text legibility at a glance.

[1]  Barbara Elizabeth Roethlein,et al.  The Relative Legibility of Different Faces of Printing Types , 1912 .

[2]  Madison Bentley,et al.  Leading and legibility. , 1921 .

[3]  Miles A. Tinker,et al.  Eye movements in reading optimal and non-optimal typography , 1944 .

[4]  M. Tinker,et al.  Influence of leading upon readability of newspaper type. , 1947, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Miles A. Tinker,et al.  Influence of simultaneous variation in size of type, width of line, and leading for newspaper type. , 1963 .

[6]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[7]  D. Becker,et al.  Reader Preferences for Typeface and Leading. , 1970 .

[8]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Poulton Ec,et al.  Size, style, and vertical spacing in the legibility of small typefaces. , 1972 .

[11]  E C Poulton,et al.  Size, style, and vertical spacing in the legibility of small typefaces. , 1972, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  H. Bouma.  Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. , 1973, Vision research.

[13]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Iconic memory and visible persistence , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  van Fl Floris Nes,et al.  Space, colour and typography on visual display terminals , 1986 .

[15]  A J Wilkins,et al.  The clarity and comfort of printed text. , 1987, Ergonomics.

[16]  P. Blough,et al.  Reaction time assessments of gender differences in visual-spatial performance , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Patrick A. Holleran,et al.  Vertical spacing of computer-presented text , 1993, INTERCHI Adjunct Proceedings.

[18]  P. Hancock,et al.  Age differences and changes in reaction time: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[19]  R. J. Miller.  Gender Differences in Illusion Response: The Influence of Spatial Strategy and Sex Ratio , 2001 .

[20]  M. Leek.  Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  J. Algina,et al.  Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[22]  R. Bakeman.  Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[23]  Roger W. Li,et al.  Crowding between first- and second-order letter stimuli in normal foveal and peripheral vision. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[24]  Tracey D. Berger,et al.  Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[25]  D. Pelli,et al.  The uncrowded window of object recognition , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Lachman,et al.  Age differences in reaction time and attention in a national telephone sample of adults: education, sex, and task complexity matter. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[27]  Jonathan Westley Peirce,et al.  Neuroinformatics Original Research Article Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using Psychopy , 2022 .

[28]  Jun-Yun Zhang,et al.  Legibility of Chinese characters in peripheral vision and the top-down influences on crowding , 2009, Vision Research.

[29]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The effects of interletter spacing in visual-word recognition. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[30]  D. Levi,et al.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  van Nes,et al.  Space , colour and typography on visual display terminals , 2012 .

[32]  Pablo Gomez,et al.  Increasing interletter spacing facilitates encoding of words , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[33]  Yi Guo,et al.  Selecting a sample size for studies with repeated measures , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[34]  Jonathan Dobres,et al.  Assessing the impact of typeface design in a text-rich automotive user interface , 2014, Ergonomics.

[35]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  The effect of decreased interletter spacing on orthographic processing , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Jonathan Dobres,et al.  The Effect of Font Weight and Rendering System on Glance-Based Text Legibility , 2016, AutomotiveUI.

[37]  Jonathan Dobres,et al.  Utilising psychophysical techniques to investigate the effects of age, typeface design, size and display polarity on glance legibility , 2016, Ergonomics.

[38]  Jonathan Dobres,et al.  Effects of ambient illumination, contrast polarity, and letter size on text legibility under glance-like reading. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[39]  Jonathan Dobres,et al.  Empirical Assessment of the Legibility of the Highway Gothic and Clearview Signage Fonts , 2017 .