Why large cells dominate estuarine phytoplankton

Surveys across the world oceans have shown that phytoplankton biomass and production are dominated by small cells (picoplankton) where nutrient concentrations are low, but large cells (microplankton) dominate when nutrient‐rich deep water is mixed to the surface. I analyzed phytoplankton size structure in samples collected over 25 yr in San Francisco Bay, a nutrient‐rich estuary. Biomass was dominated by large cells because their biomass selectively grew during blooms. Large‐cell dominance appears to be a characteristic of ecosystems at the land–sea interface, and these places may therefore function as analogs to oceanic upwelling systems. Simulations with a size‐structured NPZ model showed that runs of positive net growth rate persisted long enough for biomass of large, but not small, cells to accumulate. Model experiments showed that small cells would dominate in the absence of grazing, at lower nutrient concentrations, and at elevated (+5°C) temperatures. Underlying these results are two fundamental scaling laws: (1) large cells are grazed more slowly than small cells, and (2) grazing rate increases with temperature faster than growth rate. The model experiments suggest testable hypotheses about phytoplankton size structure at the land–sea interface: (1) anthropogenic nutrient enrichment increases cell size; (2) this response varies with temperature and only occurs at mid‐high latitudes; (3) large‐cell blooms can only develop when temperature is below a critical value, around 15°C; (4) cell size diminishes along temperature gradients from high to low latitudes; and (5) large‐cell blooms will diminish or disappear where planetary warming increases temperature beyond their critical threshold.

[1]  J. Cloern,et al.  The land–sea interface: A source of high‐quality phytoplankton to support secondary production , 2017 .

[2]  R. Kudela,et al.  Novel Analyses of Long-Term Data Provide a Scientific Basis for Chlorophyll-a Thresholds in San Francisco Bay. , 2017, Estuarine, coastal and shelf science.

[3]  J. Cloern,et al.  Water quality measurements in San Francisco Bay by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1969–2015 , 2017, Scientific Data.

[4]  T. Moisan,et al.  Satellite Observations of Phytoplankton Functional Type Spatial Distributions, Phenology, Diversity, and Ecotones , 2017, Front. Mar. Sci..

[5]  George Sugihara,et al.  Predicting coastal algal blooms in southern California. , 2017, Ecology.

[6]  W. David Miller,et al.  Variable climatic conditions dominate recent phytoplankton dynamics in Chesapeake Bay , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[7]  D. Sarno,et al.  The green–blue swing: plasticity of plankton food-webs in response to coastal oceanographic dynamics , 2015 .

[8]  Jacob Carstensen,et al.  Phytoplankton blooms in estuarine and coastal waters: Seasonal patterns and key species , 2015 .

[9]  E. Phlips,et al.  From Red Tides to Green and Brown Tides: Bloom Dynamics in a Restricted Subtropical Lagoon Under Shifting Climatic Conditions , 2015, Estuaries and Coasts.

[10]  Sharmistha Swain,et al.  CMIP5 projected changes in spring and summer drought and wet conditions over North America , 2015, Climate Dynamics.

[11]  Gunnar Brandt,et al.  Mechanisms shaping size structure and functional diversity of phytoplankton communities in the ocean , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[12]  P. Franks,et al.  Planktonic biomass size spectra: an emergent property of size-dependent physiological rates, food web dynamics, and nutrient regimes , 2014 .

[13]  Mati Kahru,et al.  Multidecadal time series of satellite-detected accumulations of cyanobacteria in the Baltic Sea , 2014 .

[14]  Stephanie Dutkiewicz,et al.  A size‐structured food‐web model for the global ocean , 2012 .

[15]  김성홍,et al.  Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd Edition, 2012 , 2012 .

[16]  Mridul K. Thomas,et al.  Allometric scaling and taxonomic variation in nutrient utilization traits and maximum growth rate of phytoplankton , 2012 .

[17]  Hongbin Liu,et al.  Does warming enhance the effect of microzooplankton grazing on marine phytoplankton in the ocean? , 2012 .

[18]  P. Boyd,et al.  Environmental control of open‐ocean phytoplankton groups: Now and in the future , 2010 .

[19]  Karline Soetaert,et al.  Solving Differential Equations in R: Package deSolve , 2010 .

[20]  Karline Soetaert,et al.  Inverse Modelling, Sensitivity and Monte Carlo Analysis in R Using Package FME , 2010 .

[21]  P. Franks,et al.  Size-structured planktonic ecosystems: constraints, controls and assembly instructions , 2010, Journal of plankton research.

[22]  R. Fulweiler,et al.  The impact of changing climate on phenology, productivity, and benthic–pelagic coupling in Narragansett Bay , 2009 .

[23]  A. Jassby,et al.  Complex seasonal patterns of primary producers at the land-sea interface. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[24]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Chaos in a long-term experiment with a plankton community , 2008, Nature.

[25]  Janet K. Thompson,et al.  A cold phase of the East Pacific triggers new phytoplankton blooms in San Francisco Bay , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Alan Y. Chiang,et al.  Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction With R , 2007, Technometrics.

[27]  P. Falkowski,et al.  Scaling-up from nutrient physiology to the size-structure of phytoplankton communities , 2006 .

[28]  G. Asner,et al.  Nitrogen Cycles: Past, Present, and Future , 2004 .

[29]  Jef Huisman,et al.  Global biodiversity patterns of marine phytoplankton and zooplankton , 2004, Nature.

[30]  David H. Schoellhamer,et al.  Effects of spatial and temporal variability of turbidity on phytoplankton blooms , 2003 .

[31]  William K. W. Li,et al.  Macroecological patterns of phytoplankton in the northwestern North Atlantic Ocean , 2002, Nature.

[32]  E. Buskey,et al.  The decline and recovery of a persistent Texas brown tide algal bloom in the Laguna Madre (Texas, USA) , 2001 .

[33]  Per Juel Hansen,et al.  Zooplankton grazing and growth: Scaling within the 2–2,000‐µm body size range , 2000 .

[34]  B. Cole,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of picocyanobacteria Synechococcus sp. in San Francisco Bay , 2000 .

[35]  J. Huisman,et al.  Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos , 1999, Nature.

[36]  J. Cloern The relative importance of light and nutrient limitation of phytoplankton growth: a simple index of coastal ecosystem sensitivity to nutrient enrichment , 1999, Aquatic Ecology.

[37]  F. Wilkerson,et al.  Silicate regulation of new production in the equatorial Pacific upwelling , 1998, Nature.

[38]  Michael T. Brett,et al.  The role of highly unsaturated fatty acids in aquatic foodweb processes , 1997 .

[39]  P. K. Bjørnsen,et al.  Zooplankton grazing and growth: Scaling within the 2‐2,‐μm body size range , 1997 .

[40]  J. Cloern PHYTOPLANKTON BLOOM DYNAMICS IN COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS' A REVIEW WITH SOME GENERAL LESSONS FROM SUSTAINED INVESTIGATION OF SAN FRANCISCO , 1996 .

[41]  B. Bautista,et al.  Copepod gut contents, ingestion rates and grazing impact on phytoplankton in relation to size structure of zooplankton and phytoplankton during a spring bloom , 1992 .

[42]  G. Brush,et al.  Long-Term History of Chesapeake Bay Anoxia , 1991, Science.

[43]  Scott W. Nixon,et al.  Physical energy inputs and the comparative ecology of lake and marine ecosystems , 1988 .

[44]  K. Banse RATES OF GROWTH, RESPIRATION AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF UNICELLULAR ALGAE AS RELATED TO CELL SIZE—A REVIEW 1, 2 , 1976 .

[45]  T. Malone THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF NANNOPLANKTON AND NETPLANKTON AS PRIMARY PRODUCERS IN TROPICAL OCEANIC AND NERITIC PHYTOPLANKTON COMMUNITIES1 , 1971 .

[46]  C. D. McNabb,et al.  ENUMERATION OF FRESHWATER PHYTOPLANKTON CONCENTRATED ON THE MEMBRANE FILTER1 , 1960 .

[47]  J. E. M. Pineda,et al.  PLANKTONIC PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND COMMUNITY RESPIRATION IN SEVERAL COASTAL LAGOONS OF THE OUTER DELTA OF THE RIO MAGDALENA, COLOMBIA , 2016 .

[48]  James E. Cloern,et al.  USGS measurements of water quality in San Francisco Bay (CA), 1969-2015 , 2016 .

[49]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[50]  Stephanie Dutkiewicz,et al.  Modeling diverse communities of marine microbes. , 2011, Annual review of marine science.

[51]  Zoe V. Finkel,et al.  Phytoplankton in a changing world: cell size and elemental stoichiometry , 2010 .

[52]  T. Thingstad A theoretical approach to structuring mechanisms in the pelagic food web , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[53]  Francisco Bay Spatial and temporal variability of picocyanobacteria Synechococcus sp . in San Francisco Bay , 2002 .

[54]  Awwa,et al.  Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater , 1999 .

[55]  M. I C H A E,et al.  The role of highly unsaturated fatty acids in aquatic foodweb processes , 1997 .

[56]  Thomas Kiørboe,et al.  Turbulence, Phytoplankton Cell Size, and the Structure of Pelagic Food Webs , 1993 .

[57]  E. Granéli,et al.  Environmental-conditions and ecophysiological mechanisms which led to the 1988 chrysochromulina-polylepis bloom - an hypothesis , 1991 .

[58]  Patrick Raimbault,et al.  Size fraction of phytoplankton in the Ligurian Sea and the Algerian Basin (Mediterranean Sea): size distribution versus total concentration , 1988 .

[59]  T. Malone Size-Fractionated Primary Productivity of Marine Phytoplankton , 1980 .

[60]  R. Eppley,et al.  Growth Rates of Marine Phytoplankton: Correlation with Light Absorption by Cell Chlorophyll a , 1966 .

[61]  H. Utermöhl Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik , 1958 .

[62]  Y. Shinmei,et al.  Macroecological patterns of phytoplankton in the northwestern North Atlantic Ocean , 2022 .