Potential distribution of orchid bees outside their native range: The cases of Eulaema polychroma (Mocsáry) and Euglossa viridissima Friese in the USA (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

Aim  This study aimed to evaluate the probability of suitable habitats in the USA for two adventive orchid bee species (Eulaema polychroma (Mocsary) and Euglossa viridissima Friese), one of which has become established in southern Florida despite the absence of its associated orchid hosts. Location  North and Central America, northern South America and the Caribbean. Methods  Using positive occurrence data within the native range of both orchid bee species, Maxent species distribution modelling was employed to evaluate the probability of suitable habitats in the USA. The power of predictability for the model was tested using partitions of the data. Results  Our results show the absence of suitable habitat in southern Arizona for E. polychroma to maintain populations there, as well as establishing the northernmost limit for the species at around 29°N in north-western Mexico. Suitable habitat was found for E. viridissima in various locations throughout southern Florida. This species is predicted to spread to occupy roughly the southern half of the Florida Peninsula. Main conclusions  The findings indicate that species distribution modelling is useful for evaluating records of species occurrence outside of their native range. Our results indicate that the isolated record of a male of E. polychroma from southern Arizona should not be considered representative of an established population in the absence of further males and females from the same region. Conversely, E. viridissima has successfully become established in south-eastern Florida after a seemingly accidental introduction first noticed in the summer of 2003. We discuss the naturalization of E. viridissima in Florida, the probability of suitable habitat across the Caribbean (where orchid bees are otherwise natively absent today) and the absence of perfume orchids (Orchidaceae). Lastly, we discuss the implications of these results for understanding the biology and biogeography of Euglossini.

[1]  M. Engel Monophyly and extensive extinction of advanced eusocial bees: insights from an unexpected Eocene diversity. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  R. Dressler Eulaema Bombiformis, E. Meriana, and Müllerian Mimicry in Related Species (Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 1979 .

[3]  A. Nemésio,et al.  Diversity and distribution of orchid bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) with a revised checklist of species. , 2007, Neotropical entomology.

[4]  G. Wheeler,et al.  Orchid bees don't need orchids: evidence from the naturalization of an orchid bee in Florida. , 2006, Ecology.

[5]  The North American Invasion of the Giant Resin Bee (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) , 2005 .

[6]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[7]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions , 2006 .

[8]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[9]  M. Araújo,et al.  Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling , 2006 .

[10]  F. Noll Behavioral Phylogeny of Corbiculate Apidae (Hymenoptera; Apinae), with Special Reference to Social Behavior , 2002, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[11]  D. Janzen Euglossine Bees as Long-Distance Pollinators of Tropical Plants , 1971, Science.

[12]  T. Schultz,et al.  Evidence for the origin of eusociality in the corbiculate bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 2001 .

[13]  M. Engel A MONOGRAPH OF THE BALTIC AMBER BEES AND EVOLUTION OF THE APOIDEA (HYMENOPTERA) , 2001 .

[14]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[15]  L. Packer,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of the corbiculate Apinae based on morphology of the sting apparatus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 2007, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[16]  A. Peterson,et al.  INTERPRETATION OF MODELS OF FUNDAMENTAL ECOLOGICAL NICHES AND SPECIES' DISTRIBUTIONAL AREAS , 2005 .

[17]  C. Michener Biogeography of the Bees , 1979 .

[18]  Steven J. Phillips Transferability, sample selection bias and background data in presence‐only modelling: a response to Peterson et al. (2007) , 2008 .

[19]  J. Wiley,et al.  ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NEOTROPICAL ORCHID BEE EUGLOSSA VIRIDISSIMA (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE) IN FLORIDA , 2005 .

[20]  M. Kearney,et al.  Habitat, environment and niche: what are we modelling? , 2006 .

[21]  D. Roubik GRAVE-ROBBING BY MALE EULAEMA (HYMENOPTERA, APIDAE) : IMPLICATIONS FOR EUGLOSSINE BIOLOGY , 1998 .

[22]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[23]  S. R. Ramírez,et al.  Abejas euglosinas (Hymenoptera: Apidae) de la Región Neotropical: Listado de especies con notassobre su biología , 2002 .

[24]  T. Schultz,et al.  Resolving conflict between morphological and molecular evidence for the origin of eusociality in the "corbiculate" bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae): a hypothesis-testing approach. , 1999 .

[25]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling , 2008 .

[26]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent , 2007 .

[27]  A. Nemésio,et al.  Biogeographic notes on rare species of Euglossina (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Apini) occurring in the Brazilian Atlantic Rain Forest , 2004 .

[28]  E. J. Anjos-Silva Discovery of Euglossa (Euglossa) cognata Moure (Apidae: Euglossini) in the Platina Basin, Mato Grosso state, Brazil , 2008 .

[29]  W. M. Whitten,et al.  Nonfloral sources of chemicals that attract male euglossine bees (Apidae: Euglossini) , 1993, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[30]  R. Dressler BIOLOGY OF THE ORCHID BEES (EUGLOSSINI) , 1982 .

[31]  P. Hernandez,et al.  The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods , 2006 .