Grassroots resource mobilization through counter-data action

In this paper, we document the counter-data action and data activism of a grassroots affordable housing advocacy group in Atlanta. Our observation and insight into these data activities and strategies are achieved through ethnographic and engaged research and participatory design. We find that counter-data action through community-collected data is rooted in a legacy of Atlanta’s black activism and black scholarship; that this data activism enabled resource mobilization and critical conscious making; and that design and media production are essential post counter-data action activities in data activism. Based on these findings, we urge the field of open government data to broaden their concept of social impact of data to include the use data to mobilize resources within oppressed communities not to influence policy and government but to build capacities within community in order to transform, not join, political structures. We also advocate that scholars within the fields of open government data, critical data studies, and data activism recognize the legacy and historic practice of data activism by black communities working towards social change.

[1]  L. Taylor.  What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally , 2017, Big Data Soc..

[2]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Virtual, visible, and actionable: Data assemblages and the sightlines of justice , 2017 .

[3]  S. Milan,et al.  Technopolitics in the Age of Big Data: The Rise of Proactive Data Activism in Latin America , 2017 .

[4]  Catherine D'Ignazio,et al.  Creative data literacy: Bridging the gap between the data-haves and data-have nots , 2017 .

[5]  Amanda Meng.  The Social Impact of Open Government Data , 2016 .

[6]  Kim Fortun,et al.  Pushback: Critical data designers and pollution politics , 2016, Big Data Soc..

[7]  Jennifer Pierre,et al.  The conundrum of police officer-involved homicides: Counter-data in Los Angeles County , 2016, Big Data Soc..

[8]  Gernot Rieder,et al.  Datatrust: Or, the political quest for numerical evidence and the epistemologies of Big Data , 2016 .

[9]  Craig M Dalton,et al.  Critical Data Studies: A dialog on data and space , 2016 .

[10]  Andrew R. Schrock,et al.  Civic hacking as data activism and advocacy: A history from publicity to open government data , 2016, New Media Soc..

[11]  Stefan Baack.  Datafication and empowerment: How the open data movement re-articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism , 2015 .

[12]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Urban indicators and dashboards: epistemology, contradictions and power/knowledge , 2015 .

[13]  Jeffrey Alan Johnson,et al.  From open data to information justice , 2014, Ethics and Information Technology.

[14]  Sumandro Chattapadhyay.  Access and use of government data by research and advocacy organisations in India: a survey of (potential) open data ecosystem , 2014, ICEGOV.

[15]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Towards Critical Data Studies: Charting and Unpacking Data Assemblages and Their Work , 2014 .

[16]  Jim Thatcher,et al.  Big Data, Big Questions| Living on Fumes: Digital Footprints, Data Fumes, and the Limitations of Spatial Big Data , 2014 .

[17]  James Mussell.  Raw Data is an Oxymoron , 2014 .

[18]  T. Davies.  Open Data in Developing Countries - Emerging Insights from Phase I , 2014 .

[19]  Tim Davies,et al.  Open Data Barometer: 2013 Global Report , 2013 .

[20]  Barbara Ubaldi,et al.  Open Government Data , 2019, Government at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean 2020.

[21]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design , 2012 .

[22]  Sunil Choenni,et al.  Socio-technical Impediments of Open Data , 2012 .

[23]  Yelena Ogneva-Himmelberger,et al.  Using geographic information systems to compare the density of stores selling tobacco and alcohol: youth making an argument for increased regulation of the tobacco permitting process in Worcester, Massachusetts, USA , 2010, Tobacco Control.

[24]  J. Krygier,et al.  Rethinking the Power of Maps , 2010 .

[25]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Rethinking maps: new frontiers of cartographic theory , 2009 .

[26]  David Stuart.  Digital Media and Democracy: Tactics in Hard Times , 2008 .

[27]  Elizabeth Armstrong,et al.  Culture, Power, and Institutions: A Multi-Institutional Politics Approach to Social Movements* , 2008 .

[28]  Ian Hacking,et al.  Kinds of People: Moving Targets , 2007 .

[29]  Earl Wright.  W. E. B. Du Bois and the Atlanta University studies on the Negro, Revisited , 2006 .

[30]  Julie Sze,et al.  Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice , 2005, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[31]  J. Krygier,et al.  An Introduction to Critical Cartography , 2005 .

[32]  P. Loh,et al.  From asthma to AirBeat: community-driven monitoring of fine particles and black carbon in Roxbury, Massachusetts. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[33]  Ian Alexander,et al.  An introduction to qualitative research , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Christopher Silver,et al.  The Separate City: Black Communities in the Urban South, 1940-1968 , 1995 .

[35]  Audre Lorde.  Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches by Audre Lorde , 1984 .

[36]  Paulo Freire,et al.  Pedagogy of the Oppressed , 2019, Toward a Just World Order.

[37]  Elliott M. Rudwick.  W. E. B. Du Bois and the Atlanta University Studies on the Negro , 1957 .