The Evolution of Variability and Robustness in Neural Development

As in all biological systems, neurons and their networks must balance precision with variability. Phenotypic precision and phenotypic variability can both occur with remarkable robustness, where robustness is defined as the ability to tolerate perturbation. Variability in genotype-phenotype mapping produces phenotypic variability despite identical genetic information. The resulting variability among genetically identical neurons can contribute to the robustness of brain development. Similarly, variability of genetically identical individuals can contribute to evolutionary robustness. We discuss here shared principles of developmental robustness and evolutionary robustness, and highlight scenarios where such principles result in neural networks that achieve robustness of precision or variability.

[1]  Heinz Koeppl,et al.  Stochastic Simulations in Systems Biology , 2010, CSE 2010.

[2]  Cornelia I Bargmann,et al.  Synaptic Specificity Is Generated by the Synaptic Guidepost Protein SYG-2 and Its Receptor, SYG-1 , 2004, Cell.

[3]  A. Wagner Robustness and evolvability: a paradox resolved , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Jan Komorowski,et al.  Phenotypically concordant and discordant monozygotic twins display different DNA copy-number-variation profiles. , 2008, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  Anirvan Ghosh,et al.  Specification of synaptic connectivity by cell surface interactions , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  E. Marder,et al.  Robust circuit rhythms in small circuits arise from variable circuit components and mechanisms , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  K. Scheckel,et al.  Intra-neuronal Competition for Synaptic Partners Conserves the Amount of Dendritic Building Material , 2017, Neuron.

[8]  J. E. Vaughn,et al.  Fine structure of synaptogenesis in the vertebrate central nervous system. , 1989, Synapse.

[9]  Bassem A. Hassan,et al.  Filopodial dynamics and growth cone stabilization in Drosophila visual circuit development , 2015, eLife.

[10]  James E. Vaughn,et al.  Review: Fine structure of synaptogenesis in the vertebrate central nervous system , 1989 .

[11]  Evan E. Eichler,et al.  LINE-1 Retrotransposition Activity in Human Genomes , 2010, Cell.

[12]  S. Ward,et al.  Electron microscopical reconstruction of the anterior sensory anatomy of the nematode caenorhabditis elegans , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  Meredith V. Trotter,et al.  Robustness and evolvability. , 2010, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[14]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  Evolvability and robustness: A paradox restored. , 2017, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Greg Gibson,et al.  Uncovering cryptic genetic variation , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  Geoffrey J Faulkner,et al.  L1 Mosaicism in Mammals: Extent, Effects, and Evolution. , 2017, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[17]  Martin P Meyer,et al.  In vivo imaging of synapse formation on a growing dendritic arbor , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  B. Dickson,et al.  Analysis of Drosophila photoreceptor axon guidance in eye-specific mosaics. , 2000, Development.

[19]  R. Mann,et al.  Differing Strategies Despite Shared Lineages of Motor Neurons and Glia to Achieve Robust Development of an Adult Neuropil in Drosophila , 2018, Neuron.

[20]  C. Goodman Isogenic grasshoppers: Genetic variability in the morphology of identified neurons , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  Eran Segal,et al.  Using Expression Profiles of Caenorhabditis elegans Neurons To Identify Genes That Mediate Synaptic Connectivity , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  Jean-Jacques Kupiec L'origine des individus , 2008 .

[23]  Benjamin L de Bivort,et al.  Behavioral idiosyncrasy reveals genetic control of phenotypic variability , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  William F Tobin,et al.  Wiring variations that enable and constrain neural computation in a sensory microcircuit , 2017 .

[25]  Alain Chédotal,et al.  Tridimensional Visualization and Analysis of Early Human Development , 2017, Cell.

[26]  Isaac Meilijson,et al.  Gene Expression of Caenorhabditis elegans Neurons Carries Information on Their Synaptic Connectivity , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Dagmar Iber,et al.  A quantitative analysis of growth control in the Drosophila eye disc , 2016, Development.

[28]  Bassem A. Hassan,et al.  Regulation of branching dynamics by axon-intrinsic asymmetries in Tyrosine Kinase Receptor signaling , 2014, eLife.

[29]  T. Schwarz,et al.  A genetic method for generating Drosophila eyes composed exclusively of mitotic clones of a single genotype. , 1999, Genetics.

[30]  S. Quake,et al.  Classifying Drosophila Olfactory Projection Neuron Subtypes by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing , 2017, Cell.

[31]  L. Luo,et al.  Teneurins Instruct Synaptic Partner Matching in an Olfactory Map , 2012, Nature.

[32]  R. Sperry CHEMOAFFINITY IN THE ORDERLY GROWTH OF NERVE FIBER PATTERNS AND CONNECTIONS. , 1963, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  J. Vilar,et al.  From molecular noise to behavioural variability in a single bacterium , 2004, Nature.

[34]  R. Hunter,et al.  The dynamic genome: transposons and environmental adaptation in the nervous system. , 2016, Epigenomics.

[35]  P. Robin Hiesinger,et al.  Beyond Molecular Codes: Simple Rules to Wire Complex Brains , 2015, Cell.

[36]  Kyle Honegger,et al.  Stochasticity, individuality and behavior , 2018, Current Biology.

[37]  Christina A. Castellani,et al.  Ontogenetic De Novo Copy Number Variations (CNVs) as a Source of Genetic Individuality: Studies on Two Families with MZD Twins for Schizophrenia , 2011, PloS one.

[38]  Matthias Weisbrod,et al.  The similarity of brain morphology in healthy monozygotic twins. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[39]  J. Kumar Building an ommatidium one cell at a time , 2012, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[40]  C. Waddington Canalization of Development and the Inheritance of Acquired Characters , 1942, Nature.

[41]  Masahito Yamagata,et al.  SIDEKICK 2 DIRECTS FORMATION OF A RETINAL CIRCUIT THAT DETECTS DIFFERENTIAL MOTION , 2015, Nature.

[42]  M. Félix,et al.  Pervasive robustness in biological systems , 2015, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[43]  D. Schmucker,et al.  Axonal wiring in neural development: Target‐independent mechanisms help to establish precision and complexity , 2015, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[44]  T. Spector,et al.  Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  S. Zipursky,et al.  The molecular basis of self-avoidance. , 2013, Annual review of neuroscience.

[46]  G. Vogt,et al.  Production of different phenotypes from the same genotype in the same environment by developmental variation , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[47]  C. Niell Theoretical analysis of a synaptotropic dendrite growth mechanism. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[48]  D. Schmucker,et al.  Role of self-avoidance in neuronal wiring , 2013, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[49]  Oliver Barnstedt,et al.  Neural transposition in the Drosophila brain: is it all bad news? , 2014, Advances in genetics.

[50]  S. Brenner,et al.  The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1986, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[51]  J. Sanes,et al.  Chemoaffinity Revisited: Dscams, Protocadherins, and Neural Circuit Assembly , 2010, Cell.