Abstract Securing a mutual fund that meets investment goals is an important reason why some investors exclusively stay with a particular mutual fund and others switch funds within their fund family. This paper empirically investigates investor attitudes toward mutual funds. Our model, based on investor responses, develops an investor's "risk profile" variable. Results indicate that regardless of whether the investors invest in nonemployer plans or in both employer and nonemployer plans, they consider their investment risk, fund performance, investment mix, and the capital base of the fund before switching funds. The model developed in this study can also assist in predicting investors' switching behavior. © 2003 Academy of Financial Services. All rights reserved. JEL classification: D12; D31; G23; P34; P46 Keywords: Customer loyalty; Fund switching behavior; Decision models; Risk analysis 1. Introduction Among the many developments in the financial sector, the growth in mutual fund investments is justifiably characterized as one of the most significant. Investments in these funds have increased from $62 billion in 1980 to $3.02 trillion in 2000 (Statistical Abstract, 2001). Mutual funds have become the primary vehicle of investments in capital markets for most individuals and households. It is estimated that nearly 47.4% of American households now own mutual funds, and most of these investors buy professionally managed mutual funds (Priai, 1999). However, evidence indicates that the average mutual fund underperforms a simple market index (Jensen, 1969; Malkiel, 1995). This may be because investors trade and switch funds frequently, which may lower their performance (Carhart, 1997). The various providers of mutual funds are in a heavily competitive market today. Initial estimates show that nearly $55 billion flowed out of equity mutual funds in July 2002 (Mayer, 2002). The primary goal of this paper is to improve our understanding of why investors switch between funds or stay with a particular fund in a family of funds. To understand this behavior, we divide the sample into two groups: investors who own investments exclusively in nonemployer plans versus those who own investments in both nonemployer plans and employer plans [e.g., 401 (k)]. It is hypothesized that investors investing exclusively in nonemployer plans differ on several behavioral dimensions from investors investing both in employer-sponsored and nonemployer plans. This study addresses the distinguishing features of these two types of investors by incorporating the logic functions of an Excel spreadsheet and a statistical model into a hybrid system to identify factors that cause each group of investors to switch funds within a fund family. In addition, as competition between mutual fund companies intensifies and uncertainty regarding the credibility of financial statements increases in the wake of recent accounting scandals, an understanding of investor behavior becomes a critical source of competitive advantage to investment houses. From a funds manager's perspective, it is important to understand why some investors stay with a particular fund and why some switch to other funds within their fund family. This knowledge enables fund managers to accomplish two strategic goals in attracting and retaining new customers. Managers know that retaining customers in a fund family is a less costly and more efficient marketing strategy than finding new customers (Levin, 1993). For this reason, it is strategically important for fund managers to develop customer profiles that will help them answer questions about loyalty and fundswitching behavior of investors. We divide the paper into six sections. In section 2, we review the literature. In section 3, we present the hypotheses and in section 4, we describe the logit model, the intelligent hybrid spreadsheet, and the research method. In section 5, we present the results. …
[1]
H. Kent Baker,et al.
Psychological Biases of Investors
,
2002
.
[2]
Peter Tufano,et al.
Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows
,
1998
.
[3]
Mark M. Carhart.
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
,
1997
.
[4]
Ray Tsaih,et al.
Forecasting S&P 500 stock index futures with a hybrid AI system
,
1998,
Decis. Support Syst..
[5]
Mark T. Maybury,et al.
Expert Finding for Collaborative Virtual Environments
,
2001,
CACM.
[6]
Shlomo Benartzi,et al.
Excessive Extrapolation and the Allocation of 401(k) Accounts to Company Stock
,
2001
.
[7]
Scott McCoy,et al.
The most important issues in knowledge management
,
2002,
CACM.
[8]
William N. Goetzmann,et al.
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE AND MUTUAL FUND INVESTORS
,
1997
.
[9]
Steven P. Peterson,et al.
Investor behavior and the persistence of poorly-performing mutual funds
,
1998
.
[10]
John J. Hirschbuhl,et al.
Using knowledge management to deliver distance learning
,
2002,
Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[11]
Gordon J. Alexander,et al.
Mutual fund shareholders: characteristics, investor knowledge, and sources of information
,
1998
.
[12]
M. C. Jensen,et al.
Risk, the Pricing of Capital Assets, and the Evaluation of Investment Portfolios
,
1969
.
[13]
F. Modigliani,et al.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
,
1997
.
[14]
Jonathan D. Jones,et al.
Investor self-selection: evidence from a mutual fund survey
,
1997
.
[15]
Richard C. Morey,et al.
Mutual fund performance appraisals: a multi-horizon perspective with endogenous benchmarking
,
1999
.
[16]
Brad M. Barber,et al.
Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 15, Number 1—Winter 2001—Pages 41–54 The Internet and the Investor
,
2022
.
[17]
A. Timmermann,et al.
The Hazards of Mutual Fund Underperformance: A Cox Regression Analysis
,
1998
.
[18]
Hersh Shefrin,et al.
Beyond greed and fear : understanding behavioral finance and the psychology of investing
,
2000
.
[19]
John C. Bogle.
Selecting equity mutual funds
,
1992
.
[20]
J. Philpot,et al.
Performance persistence and management skill in nonconventional bond mutual funds
,
2000
.
[21]
Christopher R. Blake,et al.
The Performance of Bond Mutual Funds
,
1993
.
[22]
William B. Riley,et al.
Asset Allocation and Individual Risk Aversion
,
1992
.
[23]
R. Thaler,et al.
Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice
,
1990
.
[24]
A. Khorana,et al.
The Determinants and Predictive Ability of Mutual Fund Ratings
,
1998
.
[25]
A. Stuart,et al.
Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments.
,
1960
.
[26]
William N. Goetzmann,et al.
Mutual Fund Styles
,
1996
.
[27]
Glenn Ellison,et al.
Are some mutual fund managers better than others
,
1999
.
[28]
R. Nagy,et al.
Factors Influencing Individual Investor Behavior
,
1994
.
[29]
Frances J. Milliken.
Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty
,
1987
.
[30]
Lu Zheng.
Is Money Smart? A Study of Mutual Fund Investors' Fund Selection Ability
,
1999
.
[31]
Richard A. Ippolito.
Consumer Reaction to Measures of Poor Quality: Evidence from the Mutual Fund Industry
,
1992,
The Journal of Law and Economics.
[32]
G. Zhang,et al.
Predicting mutual fund performance using artificial neural networks
,
1999
.
[33]
B. Malkiel.
Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds 1971 to 1991
,
1995
.
[34]
Jerold B. Warner,et al.
Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance
,
1997
.
[35]
Sungsoo Pyo,et al.
Knowledge Discovery in Database for Tourist Destinations
,
2002
.