A Model of Distraction using new Architectural Mechanisms to Manage Multiple Goals

Cognitive models assume a one-to-one correspondence between task and goals. We argue that modeling a task by combining multiple goals has several advantages: a task can be constructed from components that are reused from other tasks, and it enables modeling thought processes that compete with or support regular task performance. To achieve this, we updated the PRIMs architecture (a derivative of ACT-R) with the capacity for parallel goals that have different activation levels. We use this extension to model visual distraction in two experiments. The model provides explanations for the finding that distraction increases with task difficulty in a memory task, but decreases with task difficulty in a visual search task.

[1]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. , 2008, Psychological review.

[2]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. , 2008, Psychological review.

[3]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  Pre-attentive and attentive vision module , 2013, Cognitive Systems Research.

[4]  N. Taatgen,et al.  Too much control can hurt: A threaded cognition model of the attentional blink , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  G. Altman,et al.  Memory for goals , 2002 .

[6]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Tower of Hanoi: evidence for the cost of goal retrieval. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  N. Taatgen The nature and transfer of cognitive skills. , 2013, Psychological review.

[8]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Memory for goals: an activation-based model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  N. Taatgen,et al.  What happens when we switch tasks: pupil dilation in multitasking. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[10]  Allen Newell,et al.  Chunking in Soar: The anatomy of a general learning mechanism , 1985, Machine Learning.