Development of floor slab for steel post-tensioned self-centering moment frames

Abstract A floor slab constructed in conventional moment-resisting frames (MRFs) limits opening of gaps at the beam-to-column interfaces, causing losses of self-centering capability and preventing its use in steel post-tensioned (PT) moment frames. This work presents two novel slab schemes to reduce the restraints on the seismic responses of a PT frame. The first scheme uses a slab in typical MRFs with a modification so that near the connection, the metal deck is discontinuous and the longitudinal bar in the deck is debonded from concrete to minimize slab restraints. The second scheme uses truss elements to connect the slab and beams in only one bay (rigid bay) of the PT frame for transferring inertial forces from the floor to the frame. The sliding device is provided at one end of floor beams transverse to the PT frame, where sliding of the slab is expected. The cyclic behaviors of the bare connection and the connection with the first slab scheme are also evaluated by testing four connections. Additionally, how the rigid bay affects the cyclic behavior of the frame, distribution of column shear, beam axial force variation, and gap opening response near the beam-to-column interface is evaluated by conducting frame subassembly tests. The test results demonstrate that (1) the PT frame with any of two slab schemes develops large deformation capacities with small residual deformations, and (2) the column shear and beam axial force can be estimated based on the proposed method.

[1]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Seismic design and shake table tests of a steel post‐tensioned self‐centering moment frame with a slab accommodating frame expansion , 2011 .

[2]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Tests and analyses of a full-scale post-tensioned RCS frame subassembly , 2010 .

[3]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Column restraint in post‐tensioned self‐centering moment frames , 2009 .

[4]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Posttensioned Energy Dissipating Connections for Moment-Resisting Steel Frames , 2002 .

[5]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Cyclic Testing of Steel Moment Connections Rehabilitated with RBS or Welded Haunch , 2000 .

[6]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Plate-Reinforced Steel Moment-Resisting Connections , 2002 .

[7]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Cyclic performance of a type of steel beam to steel-encased reinforced concrete column moment connection , 2002 .

[8]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Hysteretic Model Development and Seismic Response of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast CFT Segmental Bridge Columns , 2007 .

[9]  Richard Sause,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Earthquake Resistant Posttensioned Steel Connections , 2002 .

[10]  Hyung-Joon Kim,et al.  Seismic design procedure and seismic response of post‐tensioned self‐centering steel frames , 2009 .

[11]  Yu-Chi Wang,et al.  Seismic design and behavior of post-tensioned steel connections including effects of a composite slab , 2008 .

[12]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Evaluating performance of post‐tensioned steel connections with strands and reduced flange plates , 2006 .

[13]  Richard Sause,et al.  Behavior and Design of Posttensioned Steel Frame Systems , 2007 .

[14]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Post-tensioned self-centering moment connections with beam bottom flange energy dissipators , 2009 .

[15]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Seismic Rehabilitation of Welded Steel Beam-to-Box Column Connections Utilizing Internal Flange Stiffeners , 2010 .

[16]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Self‐centering steel connections with steel bars and a discontinuous composite slab , 2009 .

[17]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Seismic self‐centering steel beam‐to‐column moment connections using bolted friction devices , 2008 .

[18]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Seismic rehabilitation performance of steel side plate moment connections , 2009 .